The strain demand of reinforced concrete bridge columns under seismic loading

被引:0
|
作者
Thangjitham, Jessica [1 ]
Kowalsky, Mervyn [2 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, 790 Atlantic Dr, Mason 3141, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[2] North Carolina State Univ, Raleigh, NC USA
关键词
Reinforced concrete; bridges; seismic demand; tension strain; earthquake intensity; nonlinear analysis; fiber model; FRAGILITY CURVES; HIGHWAY BRIDGES;
D O I
10.1177/87552930241237716
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The steel in reinforced concrete (RC) members that form plastic hinges must possess sufficient strain capacity to dissipate seismic deformation demands. Unfortunately, there is limited information on the seismic strain demands of bridge column plastic hinges. Instead, designers rely on a perception of cyclic strain capacity that is an approximate rule of thumb. A standard methodology needs to be established for quantifying the strain demand on these structural members as a function of the expected seismic hazard. To develop this methodology, 1944 columns were analyzed with nonlinear time-history analyses (NLTHAs) using ground motions from a range of earthquakes. This study evaluates the strain demand on RC bridge columns by defining the relationship between the strain demand and earthquake intensity. The results of the model are defined in terms of the peak tensile strain of the reinforcing bar, epsilon t . The earthquake intensity with the highest correlation to the epsilon t was determined to be the elastic spectral displacement at the optimal period ( S de ( T opt ) ), which is defined as 75% of the effective period. The relationship between epsilon t and S de ( T opt ) can be used to predict the strain demand for an RC bridge column at a given geographic location. Results are presented as a probability density function (PDF), representing strain demand, compared to a PDF of the column capacity. The intersection of the capacity curve and demand curve represents the maximum acceptable strain given as a function of S de ( T opt ) . This methodology can help understand the demand placed on a structural system given a region's seismicity.
引用
收藏
页码:2137 / 2160
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] High-Performance Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Bridge Columns under Bidirectional Cyclic Loading
    Aviram, Ady
    Stojadinovic, Bozidar
    Parra-Montesinos, Gustavo J.
    ACI STRUCTURAL JOURNAL, 2014, 111 (02) : 303 - 312
  • [42] Seismic Behavior of Under Confined Square Reinforced Concrete Columns
    Rajput, Aditya Singh
    Sharma, Umesh Kumar
    STRUCTURES, 2018, 13 : 26 - 35
  • [43] Experimental Study on Seismic Performance of HRB400 Reinforced Concrete Columns under Cyclic Loading
    Han, Yan
    Guan, Hongcheng
    Li, Zhen
    APPLICATIONS OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS, PTS 1-4, 2011, 287-290 : 703 - 707
  • [44] Flexural Capacity of Reinforced Recycled Aggregate Concrete Columns Under Seismic Loading: Database and a Simplified Model
    Cai, G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2020, 18 (3A) : 335 - 349
  • [45] Seismic behavior of steel truss reinforced concrete L-shaped columns under combined loading
    Ning, Fan
    Chen, Zongping
    Zhou, Ji
    Xu, Dingyi
    STEEL AND COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2022, 43 (02): : 139 - 152
  • [47] Seismic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Columns with Light Transverse Reinforcement under Different Lateral Loading Directions
    Thanh Phuong Pham
    Li, Bing
    ACI STRUCTURAL JOURNAL, 2013, 110 (05) : 833 - 843
  • [48] Flexural Capacity of Reinforced Recycled Aggregate Concrete Columns Under Seismic Loading: Database and a Simplified Model
    G. Cai
    International Journal of Civil Engineering, 2020, 18 : 335 - 349
  • [49] BEHAVIOR OF REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMNS UNDER DIFFERENT LOADING HISTORIES
    Yi, Weijian
    Liu, Yi
    Zhou, Yun
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWELFTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, VOLS I AND II, 2012, : 1024 - 1030
  • [50] Nonlinear Modeling of Reinforced Concrete Columns under Cyclic Loading
    Eom, Tae-Sung
    Lee, Seung-Jae
    Kim, Chul-Goo
    Park, Hong-Gun
    ACI STRUCTURAL JOURNAL, 2022, 119 (02) : 195 - 208