Flow Response of a Laminar Shock-Boundary Layer Interaction to Prescribed Surface Motions

被引:0
|
作者
Fields, James L. [1 ]
Barnes, Caleb J. [2 ]
McNamara, Jack J. [1 ]
Gaitonde, Datta V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, 201 W 19th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] US Air Force, Aerosp Syst Directorate, Res Lab, 2210 Eighth St, Wright Patterson AFB, OH 45433 USA
关键词
Boundary Layer Interaction; Laminar Shock; Fluid Structure Interaction; Flow Control; Proper Orthogonal Decomposition; Flow Separation; separation control; Shear Layers; shock boundary layer interaction; sbli; OBLIQUE SHOCK; PANEL FLUTTER; LOADS; FORM; WAVE;
D O I
10.2514/1.J064183
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
The response of an impinging laminar shock-boundary layer interaction (SBLI) to prescribed surface motions is investigated numerically at M infinity=2, Rea=120,000, and a shock-associated pressure ratio of 1.5. Parametric sweeps over classical standing and traveling mode shapes are considered at low-, moderate-, and high-frequency conditions for fluid-structure interaction. The specific values are chosen based on compliant panel deformations and frequencies reported in the literature. At low surface oscillation frequencies, the SBLI responds to the deformations in a quasi-steady fashion, with standing wave forcing displaying both breathing and sloshing of the separated region depending on structural mode shape. As the oscillation frequency is increased, the flow transitions to an unsteady response with pronounced separation bubble undulations in time. Higher-order modes and frequencies lead to the largest reductions in the time-mean separation bubble size, more so with traveling surface waves. Modal decompositions show that pressure fluctuations, which arise due to dynamic interaction with the surface, persist downstream and increase in amplitude with the surface oscillation frequency.
引用
收藏
页码:4153 / 4169
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Simulation of Hypersonic Shock-Boundary Layer Interaction Using Shock-Strength Dependent Turbulence Model
    Rathi, Harsha
    Sinha, Krishnendu
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2024, 62 (09) : 3244 - 3257
  • [42] SUPERCRITICAL CASCADE FLOW ANALYSIS WITH SHOCK-BOUNDARY LAYER INTERACTON AND SHOCK-FREE REDESIGN.
    Niederdrenk, P.
    Sobieczky, H.
    Dulikravich, G.S.
    Journal of Turbomachinery, 1987, 109 (03): : 413 - 419
  • [43] Numerical simulation of laminar hypersonic shock boundary layer interaction
    Domrose, U
    Krause, E
    Meinke, M
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR FLUGWISSENSCHAFTEN UND WELTRAUMFORSCHUNG, 1996, 20 (02): : 89 - 94
  • [44] NUMERICAL STUDY OF LAMINAR SHOCK BOUNDARY-LAYER INTERACTION
    KATZER, E
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ANGEWANDTE MATHEMATIK UND MECHANIK, 1987, 67 (05): : T290 - T292
  • [45] Disturbance waves evolvement influenced by shock-boundary interaction
    Yuan, Xiang-Jiang
    Tu, Guo-Hua
    Zhang, Han-Xin
    Shen, Qing
    Kongqi Donglixue Xuebao/Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2006, 24 (01): : 22 - 27
  • [46] Laminar mixed convection boundary layer flow induced by a permeable surface stretched with prescribed skin friction boundary conditions
    Ali, Mohamed
    Alabdulkarem, Abdullah
    ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 7 (09) : 1 - 11
  • [47] SOLUTION WITH SHOCK-BOUNDARY LAYER AND SHOCK-INTERIOR LAYER TO A CLASS OF NONLINEAR PROBLEMS
    Rongrong Tang Faculty of ScienceHuzhou Teachers CollegeHuzhou Zhenjiang
    Annals of Differential Equations, 2012, 28 (01) : 87 - 92
  • [48] SOLUTION WITH SHOCK-BOUNDARY LAYER AND SHOCK-INTERIOR LAYER TO A CLASS OF NONLINEAR PROBLEMS
    Rongrong Tang (Faculty of Science
    Annals of Applied Mathematics, 2012, (01) : 87 - 92
  • [49] Study of unsteadiness due to 3-D shock-boundary layer interaction in flow over a square-faced protuberance
    Ramachandra, K.
    Bhardwaj, S.
    Murugan, J. N.
    Sriram, R.
    SHOCK WAVES, 2023, 33 (7-8) : 569 - 583
  • [50] Time-resolved stereo PIV measurements of shock-boundary layer interaction on a supercritical airfoil
    Hartmann, Axel
    Klaas, Michael
    Schroeder, Wolfgang
    EXPERIMENTS IN FLUIDS, 2012, 52 (03) : 591 - 604