Digital twins for rapid in-situ qualification of part quality in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing

被引:5
|
作者
Bevans, Benjamin D. [1 ,2 ]
Carrington, Antonio [1 ]
Riensche, Alex [1 ,2 ]
Tenequer, Adriane [3 ]
Barrett, Christopher [4 ]
Halliday, Harold [3 ]
Srinivasan, Raghavan [5 ]
Cole, Kevin D. [6 ]
Rao, Prahalada [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Ind & Syst Engn, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[2] Univ Oklahoma, Sooner Adv Mfg Lab, Norman, OK USA
[3] Navajo Tech Univ, Ctr Adv Mfg, Crownpoint, NM USA
[4] Laser Fus Solut LLC, Fairborn, OH USA
[5] Wright State Univ, Mech & Mat Engn, Dayton, OH USA
[6] Univ Nebraska Lincoln, Mech & Mat Engn, Lincoln, NE USA
[7] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Mech Engn, Blacksburg, VA USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Laser powder bed fusion; Digital twin; Thermal and optical imaging; Thermal simulations; Porosity; Microstructure prediction; Inconel; 718; FABRICATED INCONEL 718; MELT POOL GEOMETRY; MICROSTRUCTURE; TEMPERATURE; PARAMETERS; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.addma.2024.104415
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This work concerns the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing process. Currently, LPBF parts are inspected post-process using such techniques as X-ray computed tomography, optical and scanning electron microscopy, among others. This empirical build-and-test approach for qualification of part quality is prohibitively expensive and cumbersome. To enable rapid and accurate in-situ qualification of LPBF part quality, in this work, we developed a physics and data-integrated digital twin approach. To demonstrate the approach, Inconel 718 parts of various shapes were manufactured under differing LPBF processing conditions. The process was continuously monitored using in-situ thermal and optical tomography imaging cameras. The part-scale thermal history was predicted using an experimentally validated computational thermal simulation. The simulationderived thermal history and sensor signatures were used as inputs to a k-nearest neighbor machine learning model. The machine learning model was trained with ground truth porosity and microstructure data obtained from post-process characterization. The approach predicted the onset of porosity, meltpool depth, grain size, and microhardness with an accuracy exceeding 90 % (R-2). This work thus takes a critical step towards realizing an insitu Born Qualified part quality assessment paradigm in LPBF.
引用
收藏
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Processing parameters in laser powder bed fusion metal additive manufacturing
    Oliveira, J.P.
    LaLonde, A.D.
    Ma, J.
    Materials and Design, 2020, 193
  • [32] A Review of Spatter in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing: In Situ Detection, Generation, Effects, and Countermeasures
    Li, Zheng
    Li, Hao
    Yin, Jie
    Li, Yan
    Nie, Zhenguo
    Li, Xiangyou
    You, Deyong
    Guan, Kai
    Duan, Wei
    Cao, Longchao
    Wang, Dengzhi
    Ke, Linda
    Liu, Yang
    Zhao, Ping
    Wang, Lin
    Zhu, Kunpeng
    Zhang, Zhengwen
    Gao, Liang
    Hao, Liang
    MICROMACHINES, 2022, 13 (08)
  • [33] In situ absorptivity measurements of metallic powders during laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing
    Trapp, Johannes
    Rubenchik, Alexander M.
    Guss, Gabe
    Matthews, Manyalibo J.
    APPLIED MATERIALS TODAY, 2017, 9 : 341 - 349
  • [34] Part geometry and conduction-based laser power control for powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
    Yeung, Ho
    Lane, Brandon
    Fox, Jason
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2019, 30
  • [35] Establishing specimen property to part performance relationships for laser beam powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
    Soltani-Tehrani, Arash
    Shrestha, Rakish
    Phan, Nam
    Seifi, Mohsen
    Shamsaei, Nima
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FATIGUE, 2021, 151
  • [36] An investigation into specimen property to part performance relationships for laser beam powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
    Shrestha, Rakish
    Shamsaei, Nima
    Seifi, Mohsen
    Nam Phan
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2019, 29
  • [37] TOWARD RAPID PROCESS QUALIFICATION OF LASER POWDER BED FUSION: MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL OF PART THERMAL HISTORY
    Riensche, Alexander
    Bevans, Benjamin
    Sions, John
    Snyder, Kyle
    Plotnikov, Yuri
    Hass, Derek
    Rao, Prahalada
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2024 19TH INTERNATIONAL MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, MSEC2024, VOL 1, 2024,
  • [38] Digitally twinned additive manufacturing: Detecting flaws in laser powder bed fusion by combining thermal simulations with in-situ meltpool sensor data
    Yavari, R.
    Riensche, A.
    Tekerek, E.
    Jacquemetton, L.
    Halliday, H.
    Vandever, M.
    Tenequer, A.
    Perumal, V
    Kontsos, A.
    Smoqi, Z.
    Cole, K.
    Rao, P.
    MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2021, 211
  • [39] Influences of Powder Packing Density in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Metal Additive Manufacturing
    Zhang Peng
    Zhang Shaoming
    Bi Zhongnan
    Tan Zhen
    Wang Rui
    Wang Rui
    LASER & OPTOELECTRONICS PROGRESS, 2024, 61 (05)
  • [40] Enhancing Part Quality Management Using a Holistic Data Fusion Framework in Metal Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing
    Yang, Zhuo
    Kim, Jaehyuk
    Lu, Yan
    Jones, Albert
    Witherell, Paul
    Yeung, Ho
    Ko, Hyunwoong
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SCIENCE IN ENGINEERING, 2024, 24 (05)