Systematic review of barriers, facilitators, and tools to promote shared decision making in the emergency department

被引:1
|
作者
Ubbink, Dirk T. [1 ]
Matthijssen, Melissa [2 ]
Lemrini, Samia [2 ]
van Etten-Jamaludin, Faridi S. [3 ]
Bloemers, Frank W. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Locat AMC, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam NL-1105 AZ, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Fac Med, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Res Support Med Lib, Locat AMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Trauma Surg, Locat AMC, Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
barriers; emergency department; facilitators; patient decision aids; shared decision making; MIXED-METHODS; CHOICE; CARE; AID; INTERVENTION; MEDICINE;
D O I
10.1111/acem.14998
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
ObjectiveThe objective was to systematically review all studies focusing on barriers, facilitators, and tools currently available for shared decision making (SDM) in emergency departments (EDs).BackgroundImplementing SDM in EDs seems particularly challenging, considering the fast-paced environment and sometimes life-threatening situations. Over 10 years ago, a previous review revealed only a few patient decision aids (PtDAs) available for EDs.MethodsLiterature searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane library, up to November 2023. Observational and interventional studies were included to address barriers or facilitators for SDM or to investigate effects of PtDAs on the level of SDM for patients visiting an ED.ResultsWe screened 1946 studies for eligibility, of which 33 were included. PtDAs studied in EDs address chest pain, syncope, analgesics usage, lumbar puncture, ureterolithiasis, vascular access, concussion/brain bleeding, head-CT choice, coaching for elderly people, and activation of patients with appendicitis. Only the primary outcome was meta-analyzed, showing that PtDAs significantly increased the level of SDM (18.8 on the 100-point OPTION scale; 95% CI 12.5-25.0). PtDAs also tended to increase patient knowledge, decrease decisional conflict and decrease health care services usage, with no obvious effect on overall patient satisfaction. Barriers and facilitators were identified on three levels: (1) patient level-emotions, health literacy, and their own proactivity; (2) clinician level-fear of medicolegal consequences, lack of SDM skills or knowledge, and their ideas about treatment superiority; and (3) system level-time constraints, institutional guidelines, and availability of PtDAs.ConclusionsCircumstances in EDs are generally less favorable for SDM. However, PtDAs for conditions seen in EDs are helpful in overcoming barriers to SDM and are welcomed by patients. Even in EDs, SDM is feasible and supported by an increasing number of tools for patients and physicians.
引用
收藏
页码:1037 / 1049
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Barriers to and facilitators of implementing shared decision making and decision support in a paediatric hospital: A descriptive study
    Boland, Laura
    McIsaac, Daniel I.
    Lawson, Margaret L.
    PAEDIATRICS & CHILD HEALTH, 2016, 21 (03) : E17 - E21
  • [32] Computer-Based Decision Tools for Shared Therapeutic Decision-making in Oncology: Systematic Review
    Yung, Alan
    Kay, Judy
    Beale, Philip
    Gibson, Kathryn A.
    Shaw, Tim
    JMIR CANCER, 2021, 7 (04):
  • [33] Facilitators and barriers to shared primary and specialist cancer care: a systematic review
    Karolina Lisy
    Jennifer Kent
    Amanda Piper
    Michael Jefford
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021, 29 : 85 - 96
  • [34] Behaviour, barriers and facilitators of shared decision making in breast cancer surgical treatment: A qualitative systematic review using a 'Best Fit' framework approach
    Zheng, Hongying
    Yang, Linning
    Hu, Jiale
    Yang, Yan
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2024, 27 (02)
  • [35] Facilitators and barriers to shared primary and specialist cancer care: a systematic review
    Lisy, Karolina
    Kent, Jennifer
    Piper, Amanda
    Jefford, Michael
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2021, 29 (01) : 85 - 96
  • [36] Shared Decision Making Among Racially and/or Ethnically Diverse Populations in Primary Care: A Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators
    Anaya, Yohualli
    Do, Diana
    Christensen, Leslie
    Schrager, Sarina
    ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2025, 23 (02) : 108 - 116
  • [37] TOOLS TO PROMOTE SHARED DECISION-MAKING IN LUNG CANCER SCREENING USING LOW-DOSE COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Fukunaga, Mayuko
    Halligan, Kyle
    Kodela, Jennifer
    Toomey, Shaun
    Furtado, Vanessa
    Singh, Sonal
    CHEST, 2019, 156 (04) : 1732A - 1732A
  • [38] Tools to Promote Shared Decision-Making in Lung Cancer Screening Using Low-Dose CT Scanning A Systematic Review
    Fukunaga, Mayuko Ito
    Halligan, Kyle
    Kodela, Jennifer
    Toomey, Shaun
    Furtado, Vanessa Fiorini
    Luckmann, Roger
    Han, Paul K. J.
    Mazor, Kathleen M.
    Singh, Sonal
    CHEST, 2020, 158 (06) : 2646 - 2657
  • [39] Facilitators and barriers to shared decision-making in France in 2021: National survey in cancer
    Milan, Lena
    Doucene, Sandra
    Lenoir, Gilbert
    Farsi, Fadila
    Moumjid, Nora
    Blot, Francois
    BULLETIN DU CANCER, 2023, 110 (09) : 893 - 902
  • [40] BARRIERS AND FACILITATORS IN IMPLEMENTING TRAINING IN SHARED DECISION- MAKING BASED ON REFLEXIVITY STRATEGIES
    Diouf, Ndeye Thiab
    Guay-Belanger, Sabrina
    Dofara, Georgina Suelene
    Legare, France
    ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2024, 22