Identifying Alternative Options for Chatbots With Multi-Criteria Decision-Making A Comparative Study

被引:0
|
作者
Srivastava, Praveen Ranjan [1 ]
Singh, Harshit Kumar [1 ]
Sakshi, Surabhi [1 ]
Zhang, Justin Zuopeng [2 ]
Li, Qiuzheng [3 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Management Rohtak, Rohtak, India
[2] Univ North Florida, Coggin Coll Business, Dept Management, Jacksonville, FL USA
[3] Zhejiang Wanli Univ, Ningbo, Peoples R China
关键词
Chatbots; CRITIC; Decision-Making; EDAS; MCDM; WASPAS; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.4018/JDM.345917
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Artificial intelligence-powered chatbot usage continues to grow worldwide, and there is ongoing research to identify features that maximize the utility of chatbots. This study uses the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method to find the best available alternative chatbot for task completion. We identify chatbot evaluation criteria from literature followed by inputs from experts using the Delphi method. We apply CRITIC to evaluate the relative importance of the specified criteria. Finally, we list popular alternatives of chatbots and features offered and apply WASPAS and EDAS techniques to rank the available alternatives. The alternatives explored in this study include YOU, ChatGPT, PerplexityAI, ChatSonic, and CharacterAI. Both methods yield identical results in ranking, with ChatGPT emerging as the most preferred alternative based on the criteria identified.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An extension of fuzzy decision maps for multi-criteria decision-making
    Elomda, Basem Mohamed
    Hefny, Hesham Ahmed
    Hassan, Hesham Ahmed
    EGYPTIAN INFORMATICS JOURNAL, 2013, 14 (02) : 147 - 155
  • [32] A comparison of two multi-criteria decision-making techniques
    Akhavi, F
    Hayes, C
    2003 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-5, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 956 - 961
  • [33] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making for Heterogeneous Multiprocessor Scheduling
    Saroja, S.
    Revathi, T.
    Auluck, Nitin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2018, 17 (05) : 1399 - 1427
  • [34] MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING (MCDM) TECHNIQUES IN PLANNING
    MASSAM, BH
    PROGRESS IN PLANNING, 1988, 30 : 1 - &
  • [35] A Model for Linguistic Dynamic Multi-criteria Decision-Making
    Jiang, Le
    Liu, Hongbin
    Martinez, Luis
    Cai, Jianfeng
    FOUNDATIONS OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS (ISKE 2013), 2014, 277 : 939 - 949
  • [36] Modified approach to PROMETHEE for multi-criteria decision-making
    Radojicic, Miroslav
    Zizovic, Malisa
    Nesic, Zoran
    Vasovic, Jasmina Vesic
    MAEJO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 7 (03) : 408 - 421
  • [37] Happiness at work: a multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Dahiya, Rinki
    Raghuvanshi, Juhi
    JOURNAL OF INDIAN BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2021, 13 (04) : 459 - 482
  • [38] A fuzzy multi-criteria emergency decision-making method
    Wu, Wen-Shuai
    Kou, Gang
    Peng, Yi
    Shi, Yong
    Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2012, 32 (06): : 1298 - 1304
  • [39] Decision-making for multi-criteria optimization of process planning
    Arquis E.
    Delolme L.
    Antomarchi A.-L.
    Durieux S.
    Duc E.
    Mechanics and Industry, 2019, 20
  • [40] Multiclass Classification Based on Multi-criteria Decision-making
    Baloochian, Hossein
    Ghaffary, Hamid Reza
    JOURNAL OF CLASSIFICATION, 2019, 36 (01) : 140 - 151