Spacing strategies for enhancing drought resilience and yield in maize agriculture

被引:0
|
作者
Frantova, Nicole [1 ]
Porcova, Lenka [2 ]
Jovanovic, Ivana [1 ]
Elzner, Petr [1 ]
Cerkal, Radim [1 ]
Rabek, Michal [2 ]
机构
[1] Mendel Univ Brno, Dept Crop Sci Breeding & Plant Med, Brno 613 00, Czech Republic
[2] Mendel Univ Brno, Dept Agrosyst & Bioclimatol, Brno 61300, Czech Republic
来源
OPEN AGRICULTURE | 2024年 / 9卷 / 01期
关键词
row spacing; water regime; yield improvement; maize cultivation; sustainable farming; climate adaptation; GRAIN-YIELD; WATER-USE; WHEAT; DENSITY; REGION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1515/opag-2022-0329
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
This study investigates the impact of row spacing management on the yield, tillering, and water retention capacities of two maize varieties (F1 hybrids): Alombo (FAO 240) and SY Ignis (FAO 320). Through a comprehensive field experiment, we explored how varying inter-row and intra-row spacings influence plant physiological traits, including tillering frequency, relative water content (RWC), and yield components such as ear weight, seed number, and thousand kernel weight. Our findings demonstrate that narrower inter-row spacing (0.375 m) coupled with wider intra-row spacing (0.33 m) compared to inter-row spacing (0.75 m) with intra-row spacing (0.16 m) significantly enhances tillering, RWC, and grain yield, particularly for SY Ignis. The study reveals that tillering variability, influenced by spatial arrangement, serves as a potential indicator of yield outcomes, with increased tillering associated with higher biomass production and grain yield. Additionally, the research highlights the critical role of precise spatial arrangement in optimizing maize hydration, underscoring the strategic balance between inter-row and intra-row spacing for maintaining optimal moisture levels and supporting plant health. The results underscore the complexity of row spacing effects, which are not only variety-specific but also dependent on environmental and site-specific conditions, advocating for the adoption of tailored agricultural management practices to optimize crop production efficiency, especially under changing climate conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] EFFECT OF PLANT POPULATION AND SPACING ON YIELD OF MAIZE IN HUMID TROPICS
    FAYEMI, AA
    EMPIRE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 1963, 60 (124): : 371 - +
  • [32] Effects of hybrid and row spacing on maize forage yield and quality
    Iptas, S.
    Acar, A. A.
    PLANT SOIL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 52 (11) : 515 - 522
  • [33] THE INFLUENCE OF ROW SPACING ON THE YIELD OF MAIZE HYBRIDS GROWN FOR SILAGE
    PODOLAK, M
    ROSTLINNA VYROBA, 1983, 29 (05): : 501 - 508
  • [34] THE EFFECTS OF INTERCROP SPACING PATTERNS ON THE SILAGE YIELD OF MAIZE AND SOYBEAN
    MARTIN, RC
    VOLDENG, HD
    SMITH, DL
    JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY AND CROP SCIENCE-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ACKER UND PFLANZENBAU, 1991, 167 (02): : 81 - 90
  • [35] Effect of row spacing and plant population on maize yield and quality
    Stone, P
    Pearson, A
    Sorensen, I
    Rogers, B
    AGRONOMY NEW ZEALAND, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, 30 : 67 - 75
  • [36] Microgrids as a resilience resource and strategies used by microgrids for enhancing resilience
    Hussain, Akhtar
    Van-Hai Bui
    Kim, Hak-Man
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2019, 240 : 56 - 72
  • [37] Improved yield stability of maize under drought stress
    Luethy, Michael
    Heard, Jacqueline
    IN VITRO CELLULAR & DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY-ANIMAL, 2008, 44 : S18 - S18
  • [38] Cover crop effects on maize drought stress and yield
    Hunter, Mitchell C.
    Kemanian, Armen R.
    Mortensen, David A.
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 311
  • [39] CORRESPONDENCE: Temperature and drought effects on maize yield Reply
    Lobell, David B.
    Hammer, Graeme L.
    McLean, Greg
    Messina, Carlos
    Roberts, Michael J.
    Schlenker, Wolfram
    NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2014, 4 (04) : 234 - 234
  • [40] Cover crops and drought: Maize ecophysiology and yield dataset
    Hunter, Mitchell C.
    Kemanian, Armen R.
    Mortensen, David A.
    DATA IN BRIEF, 2021, 35