Influence of different head and neck positions on performance characteristics of second generation supraglottic airway devices

被引:0
|
作者
Neha [1 ]
Talwar, Vandana [1 ]
Guria, Sushil [1 ]
Panwar, Mamta [1 ]
Aggarwal, Shipra [1 ]
机构
[1] Vardhman Mahavir Med Coll & Safdarjung Hosp, Delhi, India
关键词
Airway; Anaesthesia; Head and neck; Laryngeal mask; Position; LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY; I-GEL; INSERTION; PRESSURE; PROSEAL; CUFF;
D O I
10.1016/j.tacc.2024.101345
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Various head and neck positions alter the performance of supraglottic airway devices (SAD). We compared the influence of flexion, extension, neutral and rotation of the neck on performance characteristics of second generation airway devices namely Proseal (PLMA), i-gel and Auragain laryngeal mask. Methods: This study was conducted in 90 ASA physical status I and II patients 18-65 years of age. Patients were randomised into three groups with 30 patients in each: PLMA, i-gel and Auragain. The primary objective was to compare oropharyngeal leak pressure (OPLP) among PLMA, i-gel and Auragain in neutral, flexion, extension and lateral rotation of the neck. The secondary objective was to compare Peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), ventilation score, expired tidal volume, fiberoptic grading of laryngeal view, end tidal carbon dioxide and OPLP-PIP difference. Results: PLMA, i-gel and Auragain have the highest OPLP in flexion (34.4 +/- 2.5, 31.6 +/- 2.3, 32.8 +/- 1.7) followed by neutral, left lateral rotation and lowest in extension (26.7 +/- 1.6, 25.4 +/- 3.19, 29.6 +/- 1.0) respectively. PLMA and Auragain have significantly higher OPLP when compared to i-gel in all positions p < 0.05. In extension, OPLP with Auragain (29.6 + 1.0) was significantly higher than PLMA (26.7 + 1.6) and i-gel (25.4 + 3.1), p < 0.001. PIP was significantly higher in flexion position for all the three devices. No significant difference in fibre optic grading and ventilation score was seen for three devices in various neck positions. Conclusions: PLMA and Auragain have better sealing pressure than i-gel in all the positions. Flexion position during surgery is best for maintaining OPLP. Auragain should be preferred over PLMA and i-gel in surgeries involving extension of neck.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Influence of head and neck position on the performance of supraglottic airway devices: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kim, Min-Soo
    Park, Jin Ha
    Lee, Ki-Young
    Choi, Seung Ho
    Jung, Hwan Ho
    Kim, Ji-Ho
    Lee, Bora
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (05):
  • [2] Performance of first and second generation supraglottic airway devices in patients with simulated difficult airway: a randomised controlled trial
    Yildiz, Ergul
    Saracoglu, Kemal Tolga
    Saracoglu, Ayten
    Sorbello, Massimiliano
    Kizilay, Deniz
    Kafali, Haluk
    ANAESTHESIOLOGY INTENSIVE THERAPY, 2019, 51 (05) : 373 - 379
  • [3] The Influence of Head and Neck Position on the Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure and Cuff Position of Three Supraglottic Airway Devices
    Park, Sang-Hyun
    Han, Sung-Hee
    Do, Sang-Hwan
    Kim, Jung-Won
    Kim, Jin-Hee
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2009, 108 (01): : 112 - 117
  • [4] Supraglottic Airway Devices with Vision Guided Systems: Third Generation of Supraglottic Airway Devices
    Castillo-Monzon, Caridad G.
    Gaszynski, Tomasz
    Marroquin-Valz, Hugo A.
    Orozco-Montes, Javier
    Ratajczyk, Pawel
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (16)
  • [5] Comprehensive evaluation of manikin-based airway training with second generation supraglottic airway devices
    Schmutz, Axel
    Bohn, Erich
    Spaeth, Johannes
    Heinrich, Sebastian
    THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL RISK MANAGEMENT, 2019, 15 : 367 - 376
  • [6] Abandoning first generation supraglottic airway devices
    Pearson, K. L.
    Rodney, G. E.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 71 (08) : 978 - 979
  • [7] Airway control in case of a mass toxicological event: superiority of second-generation supraglottic airway devices
    Ophir, Nimrod
    Ramaty, Erez
    Rajuan-Galor, Inbal
    Rosman, Yossi
    Lavon, Ophir
    Shrot, Shai
    Shiyovich, Arthur
    Huerta-Hartal, Michael
    Kassirer, Michael
    Vaida, Sonia
    Gaitini, Luis
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2014, 32 (12): : 1445 - 1449
  • [8] Correct use of the terms first- and second-generation supraglottic airway devices
    Cook, Tim
    PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2015, 25 (09) : 965 - 966
  • [9] Gastric Tube Insertion Performance of Second-Generation Supraglottic Airway Devices: A Prospective Manikin Study With Literature Review
    Adachi, Yoshiya
    Kamata, Mineto
    Kitamura, Akira
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (08)