A Novelty Model Employing the Quality Life Cycle Assessment (QLCA) Indicator and Frameworks for Selecting Qualitative and Environmental Aspects for Sustainable Product Development

被引:0
|
作者
Pacana, Andrzej [1 ]
Siwiec, Dominika [1 ]
Ulewicz, Robert [2 ]
Ulewicz, Malgorzata [3 ]
机构
[1] Rzeszow Univ Technol, Fac Mech Engn & Aeronaut, PL-35959 Rzeszow, Poland
[2] Czestochowa Tech Univ, Fac Management, Dept Prod Engn & Safety, PL-42201 Czestochowa, Poland
[3] Czestochowa Tech Univ, Fac Civil Engn, PL-42201 Czestochowa, Poland
关键词
quality; LCA; product life cycle; product development; customer requirements; decision support; sustainable development; production engineering; mechanical engineering; DECISION-MAKING; DESIGN; LCA;
D O I
10.3390/su16177821
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The objective of this investigation was: (i) to develop a model that supports sustainable product development, considering the quality aspect and the environmental impact in the product life cycle, and (ii) to establish a framework to select the proportion of the share of these aspects during product development decisions. This research concentrates on achieving products that meet customer demand and have environmentally friendly life cycles. It also supports the implementation of design activities at an early stage of product development, positioning the share of quality in relation to environmental impact. The model is based on creating hypothetical prototypes of current products, and this approach concentrated on aggregating the quality (customer satisfaction) with life cycle environmental impacts (as in ISO 14040). The model was developed in five main stages, including: (i) defining product prototypes according to the modifications of quality criteria most desired by customers, (ii) assessing the quality of prototypes according to the Q quality index, (iii) prospective assessment of the environmental impacts of the life cycles of prototypes according to the LCA environmental index, (iv) methodical integration of the above-mentioned indicators into one quality and environmental indicator QLCA, and (v) analysis of possible production solutions and setting the direction of product development, taking into account both quality and environmental aspects. This research was extended with a sensitivity analysis of the QLCA indicator, after which a framework for selecting the proportion of the Q and LCA indicator's share in product development decisions was established. The originality of this research is the ability of the developed model to facilitate eco-innovative product design and improvements while also selecting the share of qualitative and environmental aspects needed to develop sustainable products. The results provide a dynamic and effective tool for manufacturing companies; mainly designers and managers during qualitative and environmental prototyping of products commonly used by customers. The model will provide support in predicting a product that will be manufactured that will be satisfactory for customers and environmentally friendly based on LCA.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [31] Cradle-to-customer life cycle assessment for environmental conscious operations and product development: case study of two precision instruments
    Paju, Marja
    Tonteri, Hannele
    LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF PRODUCTS AND TECHNOLOGIES, 2009, 262 : 66 - 73
  • [32] Case study of a water bioengineering construction site in Austria. Ecological aspects and application of an environmental life cycle assessment model
    von der Thannen, M.
    Hoerbinger, S.
    Muellebner, C.
    Biber, H.
    Rauch, H. P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 12 (04) : 599 - 609
  • [33] Case study of a water bioengineering construction site in Austria. Ecological aspects and application of an environmental life cycle assessment model
    M. von der Thannen
    S. Hoerbinger
    C. Muellebner
    H. Biber
    H. P. Rauch
    International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 2021, 12 : 599 - 609
  • [34] Combining life cycle assessment and dynamic qualitative comparative analysis to analyze the environmental impacts of urban development across different provinces in China
    Wang, Xinxin
    Zhang, Bingbing
    Qin, Yong
    Xu, Zeshui
    Skare, Marinko
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2024, 51 : 457 - 473
  • [35] Life cycle assessment of A2O bioreactor for meat processing wastewater treatment: An endeavor toward the achievement of environmental sustainable development
    Abyar, Hajar
    Younesi, Habibollah
    Nowrouzi, Mohsen
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 257
  • [36] DEVELOPMENT OF THE LIFE-CYCLE ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT MODEL FOR ESTABLISHING THE OPTIMAL IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY OF THE ROOFTOP PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM
    Koo, Choongwan
    Hong, Taehoon
    Park, Joonho
    TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2018, 24 (01) : 27 - 47
  • [37] The growing, resilient, inclusive and sustainable (GRINS) project for the development of life cycle inventory databases of beef cattle raised in Italy: The statistical datasets and the environmental assessment
    Spizzirri, U. Gianfranco
    Notarnicola, Bruno
    Astuto, Francesco
    Renzulli, Pietro A.
    Di Capua, Rosa
    Science of the Total Environment, 2024, 957
  • [38] Combining StageGate™ model using Set-Based concurrent engineering and sustainable end-of-life principles in a product development assessment tool
    de Souza, Vitor Miranda
    Borsato, Milton
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 112 : 3222 - 3231
  • [39] Comprehensive assessment system and spatial difference analysis on development level of green sustainable agriculture based on life cycle and SA-PP model
    Wang, Jiayang
    Han, Xinyu
    Liu, Wei
    Ni, Changjian
    Wu, Shaogui
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 434
  • [40] Support system for decision-making processes related to municipal solid waste management by taking into consideration a sustainable life cycle assessment: review on environmental, economic and social aspects
    Berticelli, Ritielli
    Pandolfo, Adalberto
    Reichert, Geraldo Antonio
    dos Santos Salazar, Rodrigo Fernando
    Kalil, Rosa Maria
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT AND WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2020, 26 (02) : 147 - 167