Incorporating effects of habitat patches into species distribution models

被引:1
|
作者
Riva, Federico [1 ]
Martin, Caroline Jean [2 ]
Acedo, Carmen Galan [3 ]
Bellon, Erwan Nicolas [2 ]
Keil, Petr [4 ]
Moran-Ordonez, Alejandra [2 ,5 ,6 ]
Fahrig, Lenore [3 ]
Guisan, Antoine [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Inst Environm Studies, Environm Geog Dept, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Lausanne, Dept Ecol & Evolut, Lausanne, Switzerland
[3] Carleton Univ, Dept Biol, Geomatics & Landscape Ecol Lab, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Czech Univ Life Sci Prague, Fac Environm Sci, Dept Spatial Sci, Prague, Czech Republic
[5] Univ Bern, Inst Ecol & Evolut IEE, Conservat Biol Div, Bern, Switzerland
[6] Univ Lausanne, Inst Earth Surface Dynam, Fac Geosci & Environm, Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
environmental niche models; habitat fragmentation; habitat heterogeneity; habitat loss; habitat suitability models; land use change; landscape ecology; patch area; scale of effect; spatial scale; ECOLOGICAL PROCESSES; CLIMATE-CHANGE; LANDSCAPE; FRAGMENTATION; BIODIVERSITY; PATTERN; SCALE; SIZE; PREDICTION; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1111/1365-2745.14403
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Species distribution models (SDMs) are algorithms designed to infer the distribution of species using environmental and biotic variables and have become an important tool for ecologists and conservation biologists seeking to understand the implications of environmental change. Global datasets of environmental variables at resolutions of a few metres are increasingly available. SDMs fitted using such high-resolution data allow researchers to investigate how local factors affect species occurrences at unprecedented fine spatial scales. As the spatial resolution of SDMs increases, we see a critical need to consider the characteristics of habitat types within or around raster pixels. In particular, we argue that the effects of habitat patches (EHPs, including habitat area, habitat configuration, and habitat diversity), measured focusing on patches or landscapes, have yet to be fully realized in SDMs. We provide guidelines to incorporate EHPs in SDMs. We explain why this development is important, describe approaches to properly conduct such analyses, and discuss pitfalls we foresee in testing EHPs. Synthesis. Ensuring that SDMs incorporating EHPs are properly designed will be key to increasing model predictive performance and to understanding which environmental factors influence the distribution of species at fine spatial scales. At a crucial time for nature conservation, we foresee that this will be a key step forward to understanding and protecting biodiversity. Ensuring that Species Distribution Models incorporating Effects of Habitat Patches are properly designed will be key to increasing model predictive performance and to understanding which environmental factors influence the distribution of species at fine spatial scales. At a crucial time for nature conservation, we foresee that this will be a key step forward to understanding and protecting biodiversity.image
引用
收藏
页码:2162 / 2182
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Incorporating functional connectivity into species distribution models improves the prediction of invasiveness of an exotic species not at niche equilibrium
    Pedro Filipe Pereira
    Francesco Valerio
    Rui Lourenço
    Biological Invasions, 2023, 25 : 3517 - 3533
  • [42] Incorporating physiology into species distribution models moderates the projected impact of warming on selected Mediterranean marine species
    Gamliel, Inbal
    Buba, Yehezkel
    Guy-Haim, Tamar
    Garval, Tal
    Willett, Demian
    Rilov, Gil
    Belmaker, Jonathan
    ECOGRAPHY, 2020, 43 (07) : 1090 - 1106
  • [43] Incorporating functional connectivity into species distribution models improves the prediction of invasiveness of an exotic species not at niche equilibrium
    Pereira, Pedro Filipe
    Valerio, Francesco
    Lourenco, Rui
    BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS, 2023, 25 (11) : 3517 - 3533
  • [44] Suitability of Laurentian Great Lakes for invasive species based on global species distribution models and local habitat
    Kramer, Andrew M.
    Annis, Gust
    Wittmann, Marion E.
    Chadderton, William L.
    Rutherford, Edward S.
    Lodge, David M.
    Mason, Lacey
    Beletsky, Dmitry
    Riseng, Catherine
    Drake, John M.
    ECOSPHERE, 2017, 8 (07):
  • [45] Influence of artefacts in marine digital terrain models on habitat maps and species distribution models: a multiscale assessment
    Lecours, Vincent
    Devillers, Rodolphe
    Edinger, Evan N.
    Brown, Craig J.
    Lucieer, Vanessa L.
    REMOTE SENSING IN ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2017, 3 (04) : 232 - 246
  • [46] Incorporating intraspecific variation into species distribution models improves distribution predictions, but cannot predict species traits for a wide-spread plant species
    Chardon, Nathalie Isabelle
    Pironon, Samuel
    Peterson, Megan Lynn
    Doak, Daniel Forest
    ECOGRAPHY, 2020, 43 (01) : 60 - 74
  • [47] Is it a hindrance for an invasive aquatic species to spread across scattered habitat patches?
    Treguier, Anne
    Roussel, Jean-Marc
    Belouard, Nadege
    Paillisson, Jean-Marc
    AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2018, 28 (03) : 610 - 618
  • [48] Scaling up: the role of species and habitat patches in functioning of coastal ecosystems
    Hawkins, SJ
    AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2004, 14 (03) : 217 - 219
  • [49] Incorporating plant fossil data into species distribution models is not straightforward: Pitfalls and possible solutions
    Moreno-Amat, Elena
    Manuel Rubiales, Juan
    Morales-Molino, Cesar
    Garcia-Amorena, Ignacio
    QUATERNARY SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2017, 170 : 56 - 68
  • [50] Patterns in the abundance and distribution of ichneumonid parasitoids within and across habitat patches
    Fraser, Sally E. M.
    Dytham, Calvin
    Mayhew, Peter J.
    ECOLOGICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 2008, 33 (04) : 473 - 483