We need targeted policy interventions in the EU to save soil carbon

被引:1
|
作者
Makipaa, R. [1 ]
Bruun, O. [2 ]
Lehtonen, A. [1 ]
Peltoniemi, M. [1 ]
Kulovesi, K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Nat Resources Inst Finland Luke, Helsinki, Finland
[2] Univ Eastern Finland UEF, Fac Social Sci & Business Studies, Law Sch, Joensuu, Finland
关键词
climate change; land use; climate policy; carbon sink and source; organic soils; peatland restoration and management; deforestation; forest management;
D O I
10.3389/fenvs.2024.1354695
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Globally, annual emissions from managed organic soils accounts for up to 5% of all anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Climate-wise management and restoration of degraded organic soils could reduce GHG emissions quickly and at relatively low costs. The European Union (EU) Member States that have large areas of organic soils with high GHG emissions are Sweden, Finland, Germany, Ireland, Poland, Netherlands, and the Baltic countries. To meet the climate targets and objectives of the Paris Agreement the land-use sector is indispensable and mitigation policies targeting organic soils will be needed. The international regulatory framework is broad and quite unspecific. In contrast, the European Union has initiated binding regulation for the land-use sector through the EU Climate Law, the EU LULUCF regulation, and the proposed EU Nature Restoration Law. However, even this regulatory approach is not on track to deliver on its binding ambitions, indicating the need for more effective implementation measures also on organic soils in the EU and its member states. Furthermore, we argue that appropriate policy selection should consider current knowledge regarding the climate impacts of management options of organic soils. Lastly, we need more studies on GHG emissions, and standardized methods for GHG inventories, to resolve uncertainties surrounding the impacts of management to GHG emissions. Successful policy implementation requires more efforts but also improved scientific justification through continuous consideration of climate policy integrity and strengthening of the reliability of GHG inventories.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] All we need is ... Reference Budgets as an EU Policy Indicator to Assess the Adequacy of Minimum Income Protection
    Penne, Tess
    Cornelis, Ilse
    Storms, Berenice
    SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2020, 147 (03) : 991 - 1013
  • [22] We need to say in unison: We are midwives and we do policy!
    Williams, Deanne
    JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2008, 53 (02) : 101 - 102
  • [23] The state of EU soil policy and soil related research
    Prokop G.
    Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 2005, 4 (3) : 81 - 86
  • [24] To save sturgeons, we need river channels around hydropower dams
    Zhang, Liang
    Wang, Haijun
    Gessner, Joern
    Congiu, Leonardo
    Haxton, Tim J.
    Jeppesen, Erik
    Svenning, Jens-Christian
    Xie, Ping
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2023, 120 (13)
  • [25] Do we need to destroy our societies in order to save them?
    Shiffman, S
    ADDICTION, 1997, 92 (05) : 527 - 528
  • [26] soapbox: We Need a Sustained Global Effort to Save Our Oceans
    Otte, Jan
    Sea Technology, 2024, 65 (04)
  • [27] "WE NEED TO HELP THE RUSSIANS SAVE FACE": THE "IVINSKAIA CASE" IN THE WEST
    Mancosu, Paolo
    RUSSIAN LITERATURE, 2018, 100 : 127 - 220
  • [28] We Need Precise Interventions to Stem the Opioid Epidemic
    Walco, Gary A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 60 (05) : E235 - E236
  • [29] Why we need carbon dioxide
    Robertson, T
    PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING, 2005, 18 (15) : 21 - 21
  • [30] We need to talk about engineering policy
    Cooper, Adam C. G.
    Liote, Laurent
    Colomer, Chloe
    TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2023, 72