The Correlation Between the Lactate/Albumin Ratio and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score in Patients With Sepsis and Septic Shock

被引:0
|
作者
Mahashabde, Madhulika L. [1 ]
Bhimani, Yash R. [1 ]
Bhavsar, Harin M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dr DY Patil Vidyapeeth, Hosp & Res Ctr, Dr DY Patil Med Coll, Gen Med, Pune, India
关键词
icu; septic shock; sepsis; sofa score; lactate albumin ratio; INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS DEFINITIONS; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.65616
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Sepsis is defined as a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection, often resulting in severe outcomes such as septic shock and death. Globally, sepsis ranks among the most common causes of illness and death. The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score is an established marker used to assess and predict the extent of organ failure in septic patients. The introduction of novel markers, such as the lactate/albumin (L/A) ratio, serves as a prognostic indicator in critical care settings, particularly for patients with sepsis. In this context, a higher L/A ratio upon admission aids in assessing disease severity and improving clinical decision-making to reduce mortality and adverse outcomes, which we aim to correlate through our study. Materials and methods This was an observational cross-sectional analysis conducted on 100 patients aged over 18 years who met the "Sepsis-3" guidelines and were admitted to the medical intensive care unit of Dr. D. Y. Patil Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India, between October 2022 and May 2024. Patients with chronic liver disease classified as Child-Pugh class C were excluded, as were those with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Written informed consent was obtained from each participant before the study. Data were collected through physical examination, routine laboratory investigations, and radiological assessments. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS version 20 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Descriptive statistical analyses were conducted using the SPSS data editor. Statistical significance was considered at a p-value of less than 0.05 for all analyses. Results In the study population, 78 patients survived, while 22 patients died. The L/A ratio and SOFA score were significantly higher in non-survivors compared to survivors, both upon admission and thereafter, with statistical significance (p < 0.05). The correlation between the L/A ratio and the SOFA score was examined upon admission at 24 hours, 48 hours, day 7, and day 28. Pearson correlation analysis revealed statistically significant results (p < 0.05) throughout the entire study period. Conclusion A high L/A ratio, along with the SOFA score at ICU admission, was associated with a grave prognosis and poor outcomes, serving as independent risk factors for ICU admission. Therefore, patients with a high L/A ratio and SOFA score should be identified early and managed aggressively to avoid poor outcomes. Our study demonstrates that combining serum lactate and serum albumin levels into the L/A ratio significantly enhances prognostic accuracy compared to using serum lactate alone.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Choosing the best way for urinary decompression and developing a novel predictive model for septic shock using Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) in these patients
    Law, Y. X. T.
    Shen, L.
    Khor, V. W. S.
    Chen, W. R.
    Chen, W. J. K.
    Durai, P.
    Gauhar, V.
    Lie, K. Y.
    Lee, K. C. J.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2023, 83 : S191 - S192
  • [42] The utility of initial lactate for the quick sequential organ failure assessment (LqSOFA) for emergency septic patients
    Althunayyan, Saqer M.
    Aledeny, Ahmed Abdullah
    Malabarey, Mohammed A.
    Alshaqaqiq, Ali Ibrahim
    Haj-Ali, Eyman Okbah
    Alhomsi, Mhd Walid
    Elgazar, Hagar Khaled
    Alrefaei, Tamim S. M.
    Alasiri, Saad Ali
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2025, 91 : 118 - 122
  • [43] Lost in a number: concealed heterogeneity within the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score
    Dusaj, Neville
    Papoutsi, Eleni
    Hoffman, Katherine L.
    Siempos, Ilias I.
    Schenck, Edward James
    CRITICAL CARE, 2024, 28 (01)
  • [44] Variation in SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) Score Performance in Different Infectious States
    Pawar, Rahul D.
    Shih, Jenny A.
    Balaji, Lakshman
    Grossestreuer, Anne, V
    Patel, Parth, V
    Hansen, Christopher K.
    Donnino, Michael W.
    Moskowitz, Ari
    JOURNAL OF INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2021, 36 (10) : 1217 - 1222
  • [45] Lost in a number: concealed heterogeneity within the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score
    Neville Dusaj
    Eleni Papoutsi
    Katherine L. Hoffman
    Ilias I. Siempos
    Edward James Schenck
    Critical Care, 28
  • [46] Gender-related differences in the performance of sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) to predict septic shock after percutaneous nephrolithotomy
    Rong Shen
    Wei Zhang
    Shaoxiong Ming
    Ling Li
    Yonghan Peng
    Xiaofeng Gao
    Urolithiasis, 2021, 49 : 65 - 72
  • [47] Gender-related differences in the performance of sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) to predict septic shock after percutaneous nephrolithotomy
    Shen, Rong
    Zhang, Wei
    Ming, Shaoxiong
    Li, Ling
    Peng, Yonghan
    Gao, Xiaofeng
    UROLITHIASIS, 2021, 49 (01) : 65 - 72
  • [48] Using age, arterial lactate level and sequential organ failure assessment score in risk stratification of sepsis syndromes
    Elmorsi, Amr
    Dahroug, Amr
    Fahmy, Enal
    Ahmed, Islam
    SIGNA VITAE, 2019, 15 (01) : 46 - 50
  • [49] Sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score: excellent outcome discrimination in 813 acute cardiovascular ill patients
    Janssens, U
    Graf, J
    Dujardin, R
    Lepper, W
    Merx, M
    Ortlepp, J
    Hanrath, P
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2001, 22 : 217 - 217
  • [50] Evaluation of quick sequential organ failure scores in dogs with severe sepsis and septic shock
    Osgood, A-M
    Hollenbeck, D.
    Yankin, I
    JOURNAL OF SMALL ANIMAL PRACTICE, 2022, 63 (10) : 739 - 746