Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines on Regenerative Medicine Treatment for Chronic Pain: A Consensus Report from a Multispecialty Working Group

被引:2
|
作者
D'Souza, Ryan [1 ]
Her, Yeng [1 ]
Hussain, Nasir [2 ]
Karri, Jay [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Schatman, Michael [6 ]
Calodney, Aaron [7 ]
Lam, Christopher [6 ]
Buchheit, Thomas [9 ]
Boettcher, Brennan [10 ]
Chien, George C. Chang [11 ]
Pritzlaff, Scott [12 ]
Centeno, Christopher [8 ,13 ]
Shapiro, Shane A. [14 ]
Klasova, Johana [1 ]
Grider, Jay S. [15 ]
Hubbard, Ryan [16 ]
Ege, Eliana [17 ]
Johnson, Shelby [10 ]
Epstein, Max H. [18 ]
Kubrova, Eva [10 ]
Ramadan, Mohamed Ehab [19 ]
Moreira, Alexandra Michelle [20 ]
Vardhan, Swarnima [21 ]
Eshraghi, Yashar [22 ]
Javed, Saba [23 ]
Abdullah, Newaj M. [24 ]
Christo, Paul J. [17 ]
Diwan, Sudhir [25 ]
Hassett, Leslie C. [26 ]
Sayed, Dawood [8 ]
Deer, Timothy [27 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Anesthesiol & Perioperat Med, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Ohio State Wexner Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Columbus, OH USA
[3] Univ Maryland, Dept Orthoped, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Univ Maryland, Dept Surg, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[5] Univ Maryland, Dept Anesthesiol, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[6] NYU, Grossman Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol Perioperat Care & Pain Med, New York, NY USA
[7] Precision Spine Care, Tyler, TX USA
[8] Univ Kansas, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Med Ctr, Kansas City, KS USA
[9] Duke Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Durham, NC USA
[10] Mayo Clin, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Rochester, MN USA
[11] GCC Inst, Dept Regenerat Med, Torrance, CA USA
[12] Univ Calif Sacramento, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Sacramento, CA USA
[13] Centeno Schultz Clin, Broomfield, CO USA
[14] Mayo Clin, Dept Orthoped Surg, Jacksonville, FL USA
[15] Univ Kentucky, Dept Anesthesiol, Coll Med, Lexington, KY USA
[16] Anderson Orthoped Clin, Dept Sports Med, Arlington, VA USA
[17] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Houston, TX USA
[18] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Boston, MA USA
[19] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[20] Univ Miami, Jackson Mem Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Miami, FL USA
[21] Yale New Haven Hlth Bridgeport Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Bridgeport, CT USA
[22] Ochsner Hlth Syst, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care Med, New Orleans, LA USA
[23] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Pain Med, Houston, TX USA
[24] Univ Utah, Dept Anesthesiol, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[25] Adv Spine Pk Ave, Dept Pain Med, New York, NY USA
[26] Mayo Clin, Libs, Rochester, MN USA
[27] West Virginia Univ, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Sch Med, Charleston, WV USA
来源
JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH | 2024年 / 17卷
关键词
regenerative medicine; injectable biologics; platelet-rich plasma; mesenchymal stem cell; bone marrow aspirate concentrate; pain medicine; PLATELET-RICH PLASMA; MESENCHYMAL STEM-CELLS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; AUTOLOGOUS CONDITIONED SERUM; STROMAL-VASCULAR FRACTION; BONE-MARROW CONCENTRATE; ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR; SPINAL-CORD-INJURY; INTERLEUKIN-1 RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST; COLLATERAL LIGAMENT TEARS;
D O I
10.2147/JPR.S480559
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Injectable biologics have not only been described and developed to treat dermal wounds, cardiovascular disease, and cancer, but have also been reported to treat chronic pain conditions. Despite emerging evidence supporting regenerative medicine therapy for pain, many aspects remain controversial. Methods: The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) identified the educational need for an evidence-based guideline on regenerative medicine therapy for chronic pain. The executive board nominated experts spanning multiple specialties including anesthesiology, physical medicine and rehabilitation, and sports medicine based on expertise, publications, research, and clinical practice. A steering committee selected preliminary questions, which were reviewed and refined. Evidence was appraised using the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) criteria for evidence level and degree of recommendation. Using a modified Delphi approach, consensus points were distributed to all collaborators and each collaborator voted on each point. If collaborators provided a decision of "disagree" or "abstain", they were invited to provide a rationale in a non-blinded fashion to the committee chair, who incorporated the respective comments and distributed revised versions to the committee until consensus was achieved. Results: Sixteen questions were selected for guideline development. Questions that were addressed included type of injectable biologics and mechanism, evidence in treating chronic pain indications (eg, tendinopathy, muscular pathology, osteoarthritis, inter- vertebral disc disease, neuropathic pain), role in surgical augmentation, dosing, comparative efficacy between injectable biologics, peri-procedural practices to optimize therapeutic response and quality of injectate, federal regulations, and complications with mitigating strategies. Conclusion: In well-selected individuals with certain chronic pain indications, use of injectable biologics may provide superior analgesia, functionality, and/or quality of life compared to conventional medical management or placebo. Future high-quality randomized clinical trials are warranted with implementation of minimum reporting standards, standardization of preparation protocols, investigation of dose-response associations, and comparative analysis between different injectable biologics.
引用
收藏
页码:2951 / 3001
页数:51
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evidence-Based Medicine and the American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guidelines
    Schumacher, Ross C.
    Oanh Kieu Nguyen
    Desphande, Kaivalya
    Makam, Anil N.
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2019, 179 (04) : 584 - 586
  • [22] Evidence-based medicine and the law: The courts confront clinical practice guidelines
    Rosoff, AJ
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLITICS POLICY AND LAW, 2001, 26 (02) : 327 - 368
  • [23] Evidence-based medicine in the clinical practice guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology
    Ciszewski, A.
    Kosek, M.
    Lech, K.
    Malek, L.
    Kepka, C.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2012, 33 : 897 - 898
  • [24] Does evidence-based medicine help the development of clinical practice guidelines?
    Heffner, JE
    CHEST, 1998, 113 (03) : 172S - 178S
  • [25] Myasthenia in pregnancy: best practice guidelines from a UK multispecialty working group
    Norwood, Fiona
    Dhanjal, Mandish
    Hill, Marguerite
    James, Natalie
    Jungbluth, Heinz
    Kyle, Pippa
    O'Sullivan, Geraldine
    Palace, Jacqueline
    Robb, Stephanie
    Williamson, Catherine
    Hilton-Jones, David
    Nelson-Piercy, Catherine
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 85 (05): : 538 - 543
  • [26] Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for the management of acute dental pain
    Green, Victoria G.
    Polk, Deborah E.
    Turturro, Michael A.
    Moore, Paul A.
    Carrasco-Labra, Alonso
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2025, 89 : 247 - 253
  • [27] Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on management of pain in older people
    Abdulla, Aza
    Bone, Margaret
    Adams, Nicola
    Elliott, Alison M.
    Jones, Derek
    Knaggs, Roger
    Martin, Denis
    Sampson, Elizabeth L.
    Schofield, Patricia
    AGE AND AGEING, 2013, 42 (02) : 151 - 153
  • [28] Moving from Consensus-to Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Peyronie's Disease
    Dahm, Philipp
    Jung, Jae Hung
    Bodie, Joshua
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2017, 14 (01): : 170 - 171
  • [29] Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis
    Fassbender, WJ
    Scheidt-Nave, C
    Pfeilschifter, J
    DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2003, 128 (30) : 1615 - 1616
  • [30] TREAT TO TARGET MANAGEMENT OF FIBROMYALGIA: EVIDENCE-BASED CONSENSUS ON CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES
    El Miedany, Y.
    Abu-Zaid, M. H.
    Elgaafary, M.
    Ali, N.
    Mohasseb, D.
    Zohiery, A.
    Hassan, W.
    Mortada, M. A.
    Eissa, M.
    Tabra, S. A. A.
    Fouad, N.
    Gaballah, N.
    El Noby, F.
    Saber, S.
    Moussa, S.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2022, 81 : 981 - 981