New Algorithms and Lower Bounds for All-Pairs Max-Flow in Undirected Graphs

We investigate the time-complexity of the All-Pairs Max-Flow problem: Given a graph with n nodes and m edges, compute for all pairs of nodes the maximum-flow value between them. If Max-Flow (the version with a given source-sink pair s; t) can be solved in time T (m), then an O (n(2)).T(m) is a trivial upper bound. But can we do better? For directed graphs, recent results in fine-grained complexity suggest that this time bound is essentially optimal. In contrast, for undirected graphs with edge capacities, a seminal algorithm of Gomory and Hu (1961) runs in much faster time O(n) . T(m). Under the plausible assumption that Max-Flow can be solved in near-linear time m(1+o(1)), this half-century old algorithm yields an nm(1+o(1)) bound. Several other algorithms have been designed through the years, including (O) over tilde (mn) time for unit-capacity edges (unconditionally), but none of them break the O (mn) barrier. Meanwhile, no super-linear lower bound was shown for undirected graphs. We design the first hardness reductions for All-Pairs Max-Flow in undirected graphs, giving an essentially optimal lower bound for the node-capacities setting. For edge capacities, our efforts to prove similar lower bounds have failed, but we have discovered a surprising new algorithm that breaks the O(mn) barrier for graphs with unit-capacity edges! Assuming T (m) = m(1+o(1)), our algorithm runs in time m(3=2+o(1)) and outputs a cut-equivalent tree (similarly to the Gomory-Hu algorithm). Even with current Max-Flow algorithms we improve state-of-the-art as long as m = O(n(5/3) (epsilon)). Finally, we explain the lack of lower bounds by proving a non-reducibility result. This result is based on a new quasi-linear time (O) over tilde (m) non-deterministic algorithm for constructing a cut-equivalent tree and may be of independent interest.