What if we consider research teams as teams?

被引:1
|
作者
Young, Meredith [1 ]
Dube, Tim [2 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Inst Hlth Sci Educ, Room 304,Lady Meredith House,1110 Pine Ave West, Montreal, PQ H3A 1A3, Canada
[2] Univ Sherbrooke, Dept Family & Emergency Med, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada
关键词
Research teams; Research approaches; Health Professions Education Scholarship; Collaboration; Interdisciplinary research; Transdisciplinary research; MEDICAL-EDUCATION RESEARCH; COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1007/s10459-024-10375-7
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Research teams are an important means by which knowledge is generated in Health Professions Education (HPE). Although funding agencies encourage the formation of interdisciplinary and interprofessional research teams, we know little about how our interdisciplinary and interprofessional research teams are functioning, nor how best to ensure their success. Indeed, while HPE Scholarship Units and research environments have been the object of study, little work has been focused on research teams themselves. In this article, the authors propose that research teams should be studied as unique instantiations of teams where several individuals work together towards a common goal. Considering research teams as a team can encourage attention to how effective teams are built, supported, and celebrated, it can acknowledge that competent individuals may form incompetent teams, and it opens important avenues for future research. Turning our attention to better understanding how and when research teams thrive should support the development of more effective teams; resulting in reduced waste and redundancy, better mobilization of team members' time and skills, and enhanced knowledge generation. Considering research teams as teams, encourages an understanding that these teams require care, commitment, and effort to sustain them, and it acknowledges that pursuing research in a team context is both a collaborative and a social endeavour.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 586
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] From me to we: Beating procrastination in teams☆
    Chakraborty, Anujit
    Fenig, Guidon
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2025, 231
  • [42] Diverse research teams: A framework for research review
    Akbar, Skye
    Garay, Lorraine
    Greenacre, Luke
    Defina, Rebecca
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARKET RESEARCH, 2023, 65 (2-3) : 155 - 166
  • [43] Are Real Teams Healthy Teams?
    Buljac, Martina
    Van Woerkom, Marianne
    Van Wijngaarden, Jeroen D. H.
    JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, 2013, 58 (02) : 92 - 107
  • [44] Alcohol care teams: where are we now?
    Moriarty, Kieran John
    FRONTLINE GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 11 (04) : 293 - 302
  • [45] Time and change in teams: Where we are and where we are moving
    Roe, Robert A.
    Gockel, Christine
    Meyer, Bertolt
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WORK AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 21 (05) : 629 - 656
  • [46] Cognition and gender diversity in top management teams: what do we know and where do we go?
    Muller-Horn, Fabian
    Fourne, Sebastian P. L.
    Arndt, Felix
    Obembe, Demola
    MANAGEMENT REVIEW QUARTERLY, 2024, 74 (02) : 567 - 596
  • [47] A multilevel review of stressor research in teams
    Razinskas, Stefan
    Hoegl, Martin
    JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2020, 41 (02) : 185 - 209
  • [48] A Researcher Recommendation Model for Research Teams
    Chengshan L.
    Puguo L.
    Zhen W.
    Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 2024, 8 (03) : 132 - 142
  • [49] EFFICIENCY VS SIZE OF RESEARCH TEAMS
    WALLMARK, JT
    SELLERBERG, B
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 1966, EM13 (03) : 137 - +
  • [50] Collaboration research for crisis management teams
    Drury, Jill L.
    Beaton, Emily
    Boiney, Lindsley
    Duncan, Michael O.
    Greenpope, Robin
    Howland, Maurice D.
    Klein, Gary L.
    Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction, 2009, 3 (03): : 139 - 212