What if we consider research teams as teams?

被引:1
|
作者
Young, Meredith [1 ]
Dube, Tim [2 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Inst Hlth Sci Educ, Room 304,Lady Meredith House,1110 Pine Ave West, Montreal, PQ H3A 1A3, Canada
[2] Univ Sherbrooke, Dept Family & Emergency Med, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada
关键词
Research teams; Research approaches; Health Professions Education Scholarship; Collaboration; Interdisciplinary research; Transdisciplinary research; MEDICAL-EDUCATION RESEARCH; COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1007/s10459-024-10375-7
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Research teams are an important means by which knowledge is generated in Health Professions Education (HPE). Although funding agencies encourage the formation of interdisciplinary and interprofessional research teams, we know little about how our interdisciplinary and interprofessional research teams are functioning, nor how best to ensure their success. Indeed, while HPE Scholarship Units and research environments have been the object of study, little work has been focused on research teams themselves. In this article, the authors propose that research teams should be studied as unique instantiations of teams where several individuals work together towards a common goal. Considering research teams as a team can encourage attention to how effective teams are built, supported, and celebrated, it can acknowledge that competent individuals may form incompetent teams, and it opens important avenues for future research. Turning our attention to better understanding how and when research teams thrive should support the development of more effective teams; resulting in reduced waste and redundancy, better mobilization of team members' time and skills, and enhanced knowledge generation. Considering research teams as teams, encourages an understanding that these teams require care, commitment, and effort to sustain them, and it acknowledges that pursuing research in a team context is both a collaborative and a social endeavour.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 586
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] RESEARCH CONDUCTED BY MIXED FIELD TEAMS: WHAT HAVE WE LEARNT?
    Franklin, Lucinda
    Armstrong, Stuart
    Hellard, Margaret
    Higgs, Peter
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL REVIEW, 2009, 28 : A22 - A22
  • [2] What Research on Crisis Intervention Teams Tells Us and What We Need to Ask
    Watson, Amy C.
    Compton, Michael T.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PSYCHIATRY AND THE LAW, 2019, 47 (04): : 422 - 426
  • [3] Virtual Teams: What We Know, What We Don't Know
    Pinsonneault, Alain
    Caya, Olivier
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF E-COLLABORATION, 2005, 1 (03) : 1 - 16
  • [4] Applying in the classroom what we know about groups and teams
    Stone, NJ
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS SOCIETY - 40TH ANNUAL MEETING, VOLS 1 AND 2: HUMAN CENTERED TECHNOLOGY - KEY TO THE FUTURE, 1996, : 449 - 453
  • [5] Senior Leadership Teams in Higher Education: What We Know and What We Need to Know
    Adrianna Kezar
    Jude Paul Matias Dizon
    Daniel Scott
    Innovative Higher Education, 2020, 45 : 103 - 120
  • [6] Senior Leadership Teams in Higher Education: What We Know and What We Need to Know
    Kezar, Adrianna
    Dizon, Jude Paul Matias
    Scott, Daniel
    INNOVATIVE HIGHER EDUCATION, 2020, 45 (02) : 103 - 120
  • [7] The changing ecology of teams: New directions for teams research
    Wageman, Ruth
    Gardner, Heidi
    Mortensen, Mark
    JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2012, 33 (03) : 301 - 315
  • [8] WHAT BUSINESS TEAMS CAN LEARN FROM ATHLETIC TEAMS
    SHONK, W
    SHONK, JH
    PERSONNEL, 1988, 65 (06) : 76 - &
  • [9] Teams: The way we work
    Phillips-Donaldson, D
    QUALITY PROGRESS, 2003, 36 (06) : 6 - 6
  • [10] "What We're Doing Is Wrong": Multidisciplinary Teams and Moral Distress
    Kondrat, Andy
    PM&R, 2015, 7 (07) : 767 - 768