Price spillovers and interdependences in China's agricultural commodity futures market: Evidence from the US-China trade dispute

被引:1
|
作者
Chen, Xiangyu [1 ]
Tongurai, Jittima [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Int Business & Econ, Sch Banking & Finance, 10 Huixin East St, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Kobe Univ, Grad Sch Business Adm, 2-1 Rokkodai, Nada, Kobe 6578501, Japan
关键词
Trade dispute; Dynamic connectedness; Agricultural commodities; Futures market; PRECIOUS METALS; CRUDE-OIL; UNCERTAINTY; INDEX; FINANCIALIZATION; SPECULATION; NETWORK; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.iref.2024.103579
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We examine the effects of the US-China trade dispute on price spillovers and interdependencies among the ten most liquid agricultural futures contracts traded on China's commodity exchanges by employing the time-varying connectedness framework modified by Antonakakis, Chatziantoniou, and Gabauer (2020). We find that the overall market frictions increase modestly due to the clustering of mixed informational disturbances caused by the trade dispute. This lowers the gross spillovers in the entire asset system by reducing the efficiency of general price signal transmission. Notably, subsidiary products of rapeseed and soybean contribute the most to the total and net directional spillovers in the whole market, acting as shock transmitters before the trade dispute. The RBD palm market gains a dominant role as a shock transmitter during the trade dispute and its role strengthens further after the trade agreement was reached. Additionally, the average intensity of pairwise spillovers declines considerably during the trade dispute, suggesting weakening asset interconnectedness. The responsiveness of shock transmission channels to the trade dispute impacts is found to vary across industrial chains and the presence of delayed economic effects is detected in the structural changes of market interdependences.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] US-China trade war and the WTO dispute settlement mechanism
    Adekola, Tolulope Anthony
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW AND POLICY, 2019, 18 (03) : 125 - 135
  • [22] Insurance Plus Futures: Agricultural Commodity Price Reform in China
    Kenderdine, Tristan
    ASIA & THE PACIFIC POLICY STUDIES, 2018, 5 (02): : 331 - 346
  • [23] Comments on US-China Trade War: Potential Trade and Investment Spillovers into Malaysia
    Herath, Gamini
    Poon, Wai Ching
    ASIAN ECONOMIC PAPERS, 2019, 18 (03) : 138 - 140
  • [24] Multifractal analysis of the impact of US-China trade friction on US and China soy futures markets
    Ji, Qiangbiao
    Zhang, Xin
    Zhu, Yingming
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2020, 542
  • [25] Navigating the US-China Decoupling: Malaysia's Response to the US-China Trade War
    Kam, Andrew Jia-Yi
    ASIAN ECONOMIC PAPERS, 2024, 23 (02) : 144 - 173
  • [26] American Farmers' Attitudes toward China and the US-China Trade Dispute: A Mediated Relationship
    Han, Guang
    Rodriguez, Lulu
    Qu, Shuyang
    INTERNATIONAL FOOD AND AGRIBUSINESS MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2023, 26 (05): : 861 - 881
  • [27] Impact of the US-China trade war on resource allocation: Evidence from China's land supply
    Yang, Jidong
    Huang, Bin
    Yang, Qijing
    Zhou, Yulong
    CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2022, 76
  • [28] The impact of US-China trade war on Chinese firms: Evidence from stock market reactions
    Wang, Xiaoquan
    Wang, Xinyue
    Zhong, Zheng
    Yao, Junnan
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2021, 28 (07) : 579 - 583
  • [29] Trade networks and firm value: Evidence from the US-China trade war
    Huang, Yi
    Lin, Chen
    Liu, Sibo
    Tang, Heiwai
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2023, 145
  • [30] US-China trade war and China's stock market: an event-driven analysis
    He Chengying
    Chen Rui
    Liu Ying
    ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2022, 35 (01): : 3277 - 3290