Evaluation of technical approaches for real-time data transfer from electronic health record systems

被引:0
|
作者
Kirilov, N. [1 ]
Dugas, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ Hosp, Inst Med Informat, Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
Real-time data; Transfer; EHR; FHIR; Latency;
D O I
10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108347
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Background and Objective: Real-time data (RTD) are data that are delivered immediately after creation. The key feature of RTD is low delivery latency. Information systems in health care are extremely time-sensitive and their building block is the electronic health record (EHR). Real-time data from EHRs play an important role to support decision-making, analytics and coordination of care. This is well mentioned in the literature, but the process has not yet been described, providing reference implementations and testing. Real-time data delivery can technically be achieved using several methods. The objective of this work is to evaluate the performance of different transfer methods of RTD from EHRs by measuring delivery latency. Methods: In our work we used four approaches to transfer RTD from EHRs: REST hooks, WebSocket notifications, reverse proxy and database triggers. We deployed a Fast Health Interoperability Resources (FHIR) server as it is one of the most widely used EHR standard. For the reference implementations we used Python and Golang. Delivery latency was selected as performance metric, derived by subtracting the timestamp of the EHR resource creation from the timestamp of the EHR resource receipt in millisecond. The data was analyzed using descriptive statistics, cumulative distribution function (CDF), Kruskal-Wallis and post-hoc tests. Results: The database trigger approach had the best mean delivery latency 13.52+5.56 ms, followed by the reverse proxy 14.43+4.58 ms, REST hooks 19.26+5.76 ms and WebSocket 27.32+9.44 ms. The reverse proxy showed a tighter range of the values and lower variability. There were significant differences in the latencies between all pairs of approaches, except for reverse proxy and database trigger. Conclusion: Real-time data transfer is vital for the development of robust and innovative healthcare applications. Properties of current EHR systems as a data source predefine the approaches for transfer. In our work for the first time the performance of RTD transfer from the EHRs with reference implementations is measured and evaluated. We found that database triggers achieve lowest delivery latency. Reverse proxy performed slightly slower, but offered more stability, followed by REST hooks and WebSocket notifications.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prognostic Modeling for Liver Cirrhosis Mortality Prediction and Real-Time Health Monitoring from Electronic Health Data
    Zhang, Chengping
    Iqbal, Muhammad Faisal Buland
    Iqbal, Imran
    Cheng, Minghao
    Sarhan, Nadia
    Awwad, Emad Mahrous
    Ghadi, Yazeed Yasin
    BIG DATA, 2024,
  • [22] TECHNICAL APPROACHES TO REAL-TIME CONTROL-BASED ON TRANSPUTERS
    GUAN, HW
    COMPUTING & CONTROL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 1995, 6 (02): : 75 - 78
  • [23] Approaches for real-time integration of Semantic Web data in distributed enterprise systems
    Dabrowski, Maciej
    Griffin, Keith
    Passant, Alexandre
    FIFTH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SEMANTIC COMPUTING (ICSC 2011), 2011, : 47 - 50
  • [24] An Electronic Health Record Based Real-Time Analytics Program For Patient Safety Surveillance And Improvement
    Classen, David
    Li, Michael
    Miller, Suzanne
    Ladner, Drew
    HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2018, 37 (11) : 1805 - 1812
  • [25] Prospective Validation of an Electronic Health Record-Based, Real-Time Suicide Risk Model
    Walsh, Colin G.
    Johnson, Kevin B.
    Ripperger, Michael
    Sperry, Sarah
    Harris, Joyce
    Clark, Nathaniel
    Fielstein, Elliot
    Novak, Laurie
    Robinson, Katelyn
    Stead, William W.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2021, 4 (03)
  • [26] Comparison of Approaches for Heart Failure Case Identification From Electronic Health Record Data
    Blecker, Saul
    Katz, Stuart D.
    Horwitz, Leora I.
    Kuperman, Gilad
    Park, Hannah
    Gold, Alex
    Sontag, David
    JAMA CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 1 (09) : 1014 - 1020
  • [27] Evaluation of real-time PCR data
    Vaerman, JL
    Saussoy, P
    Ingargiola, I
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL REGULATORS AND HOMEOSTATIC AGENTS, 2004, 18 (02): : 212 - 214
  • [28] REAL-TIME DATA COLLECTION SYSTEMS
    JOHNSON, NE
    JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT, 1969, 20 (09): : 26 - 29
  • [29] Real-time extraction of breast cancer treatment process and outcome measures from an EPIC electronic health record (EHR)
    Kuznetsov, Julie Lawrence
    Bailey, Kathryn
    Bombach, Pacharintra K.
    Carmichael, Stacey
    Chen, Xuemei
    Herberg, Maja Lichstein
    Owen, Terri
    Wilson, Jorge
    Blayney, Douglas W.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (31)
  • [30] Evaluation of spoken dialogue technology for real-time health data collection
    Levin, Esther
    Levin, Alex
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2006, 8 (04) : e30