Screening of the global health priority Box® reveals potential new disinfectants against the emerging multidrug-resistant pathogen Candida auris

Background: Candida auris has been identified by the World Health Organization as a critical pathogen due to its invasive nature, resistance to multiple drugs, and high mortality rates in hospital outbreaks. This fungus can persist on surfaces and human skin for extended periods, complicating infection control efforts. The need for effective disinfection strategies is urgent, as current disinfectants are often ineffective against C. auris biofilms. Objective: The study aimed to identify potential disinfectants from a collection of 240 compounds in the Global Health Priority Box (R) that are effective against C. auris, particularly strains resistant to existing options. Methods: The research employed a screening protocol using a fluconazole-resistant strain of C. auris (149/23). Antifungal activity was assessed using the microdilution method to determine Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs) and Minimum Fungicidal Concentrations (MFCs). Additional assays were conducted to evaluate biofilm inhibition, biofilm eradication, cell membrane integrity, nucleotide leakage, sorbitol protection assay, efflux pump inhibition, and hemolysis assay. Results: Two compounds, Hydramethylnon (MMV1577471) and Flufenerim (MMV1794206), demonstrated significant inhibitory effects against C. auris. Hydramethylnon exhibited potent antifungal activity, inhibiting up to 93 % of fungal growth with an MFC of 16 mu g/mL. Flufenerim inhibited up to 58 % of fungal growth, showing fungistatic action with an MFC greater than 4 mu g/mL. Biofilm inhibition tests showed that both compounds significantly inhibited biofilm formation, with increased efficacy at higher concentrations. Both compounds showed eradication rates in both stages. Furthermore, Hydramethylnon and Flufenerim did not affect cell membrane integrity or nucleotide leakage, suggesting a mode of action not reliant on disrupting these cellular components. The sorbitol protection assay revealed that neither compound caused cell wall damage. In the efflux pump inhibition assay, Hydramethylnon did not activate efflux pumps, while Flufenerim activated efflux pumps, reducing its effectiveness. Hemocompatibility assay showed safety. Conclusion: The study highlights Hydramethylnon and Flufenerim as promising candidates for further development as disinfectants, offering potential solutions to the urgent need for effective disinfection agents against C. auris. The findings underscore the value of screening compound collections to identify novel antifungal agents and understand their mechanisms of action, thereby contributing to the advancement of new disinfection strategies in healthcare settings.