Policy for whom? The heterogeneous effects of innovation policy on urban economy

被引:2
|
作者
Jin, Xin [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Guanghua [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Min [3 ]
机构
[1] Cent Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Informat, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] Cent Univ Finance & Econ, Engn Res Ctr State Financial Secur, Minist Educ, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
[3] Shandong Normal Univ, Business Sch, Jinan 250014, Peoples R China
关键词
Innovative city pilot policy; Urban economic growth; Difference in difference; AGGLOMERATION; PRODUCTIVITY; RETURNS; CITIES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.cities.2024.105193
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
Assessing the heterogeneity of urban innovation policies offers key insights into limited resources allocation and urban policy implications. This knowledge can enhance the effectiveness and rationality of urban policy-making and maximize economic benefits. By utilizing panel data from 280 Chinese cities (2003-2016), this study explores the impact of city-level innovation policies on economic performance through difference-in-difference analysis. It reveals that the Innovative City Pilot Policy (ICPP) positively influences urban economies for at least three years. Notably, significant spillover effects are observed within a 50 to 100 km radius of pilot cities, diminishing beyond 150 km. Meanwhile, the siphonic effects of pilot cities on the surrounding cities are not pronounced. The study identifies technological innovation and institutional innovation as key mechanisms driving economic growth through ICPP, though institutional innovation's effects require strengthening. Furthermore, while the city's administrative level has a minimal impact, cities with populations between 1 and 5 million exhibit the most substantial economic benefits. Additionally, innovation policies aligned with provinciallevel frameworks yield more robust effects in double-pilot cities compared to their single or multiple pilot counterparts.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] INNOVATION POLICY IN CROATIA BETWEEN INDUSTRIAL ECONOMY AND ECONOMY OF KNOWLEDGE
    Radas, Antonija Mrsic
    Petkovic, Kresimir
    EKONOMSKA MISAO I PRAKSA-ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND PRACTICE, 2021, 30 (01): : 3 - 39
  • [22] The positive effects of the higher education expansion policy on urban innovation in China
    Zhang, Qinghua
    Chen, Yuhang
    Zhong, Yilin
    Zhong, Junhao
    AIMS MATHEMATICS, 2024, 9 (02): : 2992 - 3010
  • [23] Fiscal policy effects in a heterogeneous-agent OLG economy with an aging population
    Nishiyama, Shinichi
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 2015, 61 : 114 - 132
  • [24] JAPAN URBAN-ECONOMY AND LAND POLICY
    MIYAO, T
    ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 1991, 513 : 130 - 138
  • [25] Urban freight policy innovation: Case studies
    Marcucci, Edoardo
    Gatta, Valerio
    Macharis, Cathy
    RESEARCH IN TRANSPORTATION ECONOMICS, 2017, 65 : 1 - 2
  • [26] Urban Freight Policy Innovation: Assessment methods
    Marcucci, Edoardo
    Gatta, Valerio
    Macharis, Cathy
    RESEARCH IN TRANSPORTATION ECONOMICS, 2017, 64 : 1 - 2
  • [27] Stakeholder reactions to urban freight policy innovation
    Stathopoulos, Amanda
    Valeri, Eva
    Marcucci, Edoardo
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2012, 22 : 34 - 45
  • [28] Canadian Science, Technology and Innovation Policy: The Innovation Economy and Society Nexus
    Lemay, Margaret A.
    SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2018, 45 (03) : 428 - 429
  • [29] THE HETEROGENEOUS IMPACT OF INDUSTRIAL POLICY ON TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION IN DIGITAL ECONOMY INDUSTRY FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
    Li, Zhuojing
    PSYCHIATRIA DANUBINA, 2021, 33 : S176 - S177
  • [30] Macroeconomic and environmental impacts of circular economy innovation policy
    Boonman, Hettie
    Verstraten, Pieter
    van der Weijde, Adriaan H.
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2023, 35 : 216 - 228