Policy for whom? The heterogeneous effects of innovation policy on urban economy

被引:2
|
作者
Jin, Xin [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Guanghua [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Min [3 ]
机构
[1] Cent Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Informat, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] Cent Univ Finance & Econ, Engn Res Ctr State Financial Secur, Minist Educ, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
[3] Shandong Normal Univ, Business Sch, Jinan 250014, Peoples R China
关键词
Innovative city pilot policy; Urban economic growth; Difference in difference; AGGLOMERATION; PRODUCTIVITY; RETURNS; CITIES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.cities.2024.105193
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
Assessing the heterogeneity of urban innovation policies offers key insights into limited resources allocation and urban policy implications. This knowledge can enhance the effectiveness and rationality of urban policy-making and maximize economic benefits. By utilizing panel data from 280 Chinese cities (2003-2016), this study explores the impact of city-level innovation policies on economic performance through difference-in-difference analysis. It reveals that the Innovative City Pilot Policy (ICPP) positively influences urban economies for at least three years. Notably, significant spillover effects are observed within a 50 to 100 km radius of pilot cities, diminishing beyond 150 km. Meanwhile, the siphonic effects of pilot cities on the surrounding cities are not pronounced. The study identifies technological innovation and institutional innovation as key mechanisms driving economic growth through ICPP, though institutional innovation's effects require strengthening. Furthermore, while the city's administrative level has a minimal impact, cities with populations between 1 and 5 million exhibit the most substantial economic benefits. Additionally, innovation policies aligned with provinciallevel frameworks yield more robust effects in double-pilot cities compared to their single or multiple pilot counterparts.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Innovation policy in a global economy
    Potts, Jason
    JOURNAL OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2016, 5 (03) : 308 - 324
  • [2] Innovation policy in a global economy
    Siler, P
    NEW TECHNOLOGY WORK AND EMPLOYMENT, 2001, 16 (01) : 66 - 68
  • [3] Dynamic effects of patent policy on innovation and inequality in a Schumpeterian economy
    Angus C. Chu
    Yuichi Furukawa
    Sushanta Mallick
    Pietro Peretto
    Xilin Wang
    Economic Theory, 2021, 71 : 1429 - 1465
  • [4] Dynamic effects of patent policy on innovation and inequality in a Schumpeterian economy
    Chu, Angus C.
    Furukawa, Yuichi
    Mallick, Sushanta
    Peretto, Pietro
    Wang, Xilin
    ECONOMIC THEORY, 2021, 71 (04) : 1429 - 1465
  • [5] State policy as a factor in the innovation economy
    Tahumova, O. V.
    TERRA ECONOMICUS, 2012, 10 (03): : 37 - 38
  • [6] Innovation policy in the globalizing learning economy
    Lundvall, BA
    GLOBALIZING LEARNING ECONOMY, 2001, : 273 - 291
  • [7] Cultural economy at work in the city of Kristiansand: cultural policy as incentive for urban innovation
    Lysgard, Hans Kjetil
    Tveiten, Oddgeir
    AI & SOCIETY, 2005, 19 (04) : 485 - 499
  • [8] The Heterogeneous Effects of Different Environmental Policy Instruments on Green Technology Innovation
    Yi, Ming
    Fang, Xiaomeng
    Wen, Le
    Guang, Fengtao
    Zhang, Yao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (23)
  • [9] Innovation and integration in urban transport policy
    May, A. D.
    Tight, M. R.
    TRANSPORT POLICY, 2006, 13 (04) : 281 - 282
  • [10] Environmental policy and innovation:: an international comparison of policy frameworks and innovation effects
    Jänicke, M
    Blazejczak, J
    Edler, D
    Hemmelskamp, J
    INNOVATION-ORIENTED ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION: THEORETICAL APPROACHES AND EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS, 2000, 10 : 125 - 152