The impact of powerful CFOs in M&A: evidence from US acquisitions

被引:0
|
作者
Lammers, Frederic [1 ]
Pape, Ulrich [1 ]
机构
[1] Chair Finance ESCP Business Sch, Berlin, Germany
关键词
Mergers and acquisitions; Upper echelons; CFO; Managerial power; G34; G40; CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERS; UPPER ECHELONS; INVESTMENT BANKER; CORPORATE ACQUISITIONS; WORK EXPERIENCE; MODERATING ROLE; CEOS MATTER; MANAGEMENT; MERGERS; ADVISERS;
D O I
10.1007/s11846-024-00803-8
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Practitioners and researchers have long been interested in gaining a better understanding of the factors driving Mergers & Acquisitions (M&A) outcomes. While studies are increasingly adopting an upper-echelons perspective in this regard, the role of individual decision-makers, other than the chief executive officer, remains poorly understood. In this study, we investigate how acquiring companies' chief financial officers (CFOs), who possess greater managerial power to influence crucial decisions in the acquisition process, can affect M&A outcomes. We expect greater decision authority to enable CFOs to contribute valuable financial expertise at different stages of a deal, ultimately enhancing the takeover's overall value creation. Utilizing a large sample of U.S. transactions that occurred from 1996 to 2018, our results suggest that more powerful CFOs improve M&A performance in large deals where shareholders presume CFO financial expertise will be especially valuable. Further analyses of specific mechanisms through which CFOs improve M&A outcomes reveal the importance of distinguishing between the multiple dimensions through which CFOs gain influence in a firm. In this context, we find that CFOs' M&A experience (i.e., their expertise power) is the most persistent dimension of improved deal outcomes, as reduced takeover premiums and lower third-party advisory fees make clear.
引用
收藏
页数:42
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Investor Demand for Internal Control Audits of Large US Companies: Evidence from a Regulatory Exemption for M&A Transactions
    Carnes, Robert R.
    Christensen, Dane M.
    Lamoreaux, Phillip T.
    ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2019, 94 (01): : 71 - 99
  • [32] Corporate governance and merger and acquisition (M&A) FDI: Firm-level evidence from Japanese FDI into the US
    Alba, Joseph D.
    Park, Donghyun
    Wang, Peiming
    JOURNAL OF MULTINATIONAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2009, 19 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [33] Local risk preference and corporate policies: evidence from M&A
    Chen, Jeffrey
    Huseynov, Fariz
    Li, Bochen
    Zhang, Wei
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2021, 53 (45) : 5158 - 5176
  • [34] Disciplining Role of Short Sellers: Evidence From M&A Activity
    Shi Wei
    Ndofor, Hermann Achidi
    Hoskisson, Robert E.
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2021, 47 (05) : 1103 - 1133
  • [35] Carbon risk and technological mergers and acquisitions(M&A):The perspective of institutional pressures
    Chen, Jinyu
    Fan, Yirui
    Yang, Yan
    Tang, Ying
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2025, 143
  • [36] The effect of institutional ownership on M&A performance: evidence from China
    Ma, Lina
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2020, 27 (02) : 140 - 144
  • [37] Multiple large shareholders and M&A quality: evidence from China
    Yu, Xiaohong
    Lyu, Bo
    Li, Jingjing
    Xu, Ming
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2024,
  • [38] Performance feedback on sales growth and M&A: Evidence from China
    Guo, Jianquan
    Cheng, He
    JAPAN AND THE WORLD ECONOMY, 2024, 69
  • [39] Foreign M&A and inventory adjustment: Evidence from Chinese manufacturers
    Zhao, Wei
    Wei, Xiangyu
    Li, Yunong
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN ECONOMICS, 2024, 90
  • [40] How does the market for corporate control impact tax avoidance? Evidence from international M&A laws
    Jinshuai Hu
    Siqi Li
    Terry Shevlin
    Review of Accounting Studies, 2023, 28 : 340 - 383