Mapping optimal orthodontic implant sites in the palate using cone-beam computed tomography

被引:0
|
作者
Zhu, Zhengxian [1 ]
Zhong, Lin [2 ]
Zhao, Yicheng [3 ]
Wang, Xiaoting [1 ]
Qian, Wenhao [4 ]
Ye, Niansong [5 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Xuhui Dist Dent Ctr, Dept Orthodont, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jingan Dist Cent Hosp, Dept Stomatol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Tianjin Med Univ, Dept Oral Prothodont, Stomatol Hosp, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Xuhui Dist Dent Ctr, Dept Implantol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[5] Shanghai Hua Guang, Dept Orthodont, Shanghai, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
palatal thickness; cortical density; orthodontic mini-implants; cone-beam CT; mini-implant anchorage; CORTICAL-BONE THICKNESS; MINI-IMPLANT; SOFT-TISSUE; INSERTION; DENSITY; CLASSIFICATION; MATURATION; FAILURE; QUALITY;
D O I
10.3389/froh.2024.1453665
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: To measure the palatal soft tissue thickness and cortical bone density to determine safe regions for the placement of orthodontic mini-implants and to examine the influence of sex and age on soft tissue thickness and cortical bone density. Materials and methods: Cone-beam computed tomography images of 42 patients (22 males and 20 females), including 21 adults and 21 adolescents, were examined in this study. The palatal soft tissue thickness and cortical bone density were measured at the coronal planes between the premolars (P4-5), between the second premolars and first molars (P5-6), and between the first molars and second molars (P6-7). Results: The thickness of the soft tissue revealed similar coronal planes, but the bone density varied. The mean thickness was 3.8 mm at 0 degrees-60 degrees and 1.5 mm at 60 degrees-90 degrees. P4-5 had the highest bone density (>600 HU), decreasing toward P6-7 (<600 HU). Bone density decreased from 90 degrees to 0 degrees coronally, whereas the soft tissue thickness increased. Age, sex, and their interaction affected bone and soft tissues. Conclusions: In general, areas with a high bone density tended to have thin soft tissue coronally, thus the preferred implant site tends to be more anterior to the P4-5 plane and closer to 60 degrees-90 degrees. Considering individual variances, mapping of the recommended regions for palatal mini-implants is suggested.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Is Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Always Necessary for Dental Implant Placement?
    Deeb, George
    Antonos, Ludmils
    Tack, Samuel
    Carrico, Caroline
    Laskin, Daniel
    Deeb, Janina Golob
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 75 (02) : 285 - 289
  • [22] Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography is limited at implant sites with a thin buccal bone: A laboratory study
    Domic, Danijel
    Bertl, Kristina
    Ahmad, Salman
    Schropp, Lars
    Hellen-Halme, Kristina
    Stavropoulos, Andreas
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2021, 92 (04) : 592 - 601
  • [23] Stereotactic registration using cone-beam computed tomography
    Carlson, Jonathan Dennis
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 182 : 107 - 111
  • [24] Osteoporosis detection using cone-beam computed tomography
    Geibel, M-A.
    Loeffler, F.
    Kildal, D.
    ORTHOPADE, 2016, 45 (12): : 1066 - 1071
  • [25] Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Incidental Findings in Individuals With Cleft Lip and Palate
    Santos, Giancarlo
    Ickow, Ilana
    Job, Joici
    Brooker, Jack E.
    Dvoracek, Lucas A.
    Rigby, Erick
    Shah, Nilesh
    Chen, Wendy
    Branstetter, Barton
    Schuster, Lindsay A.
    CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2020, 57 (04): : 404 - 411
  • [26] Cone-Beam Computed Tomography is not the Imaging Technique of Choice for Comprehensive Orthodontic Assessment
    Halazonetis, D. J.
    INFORMATIONEN AUS ORTHODONTIE UND KIEFERORTHOPAEDIE, 2015, 47 (04): : 225 - 229
  • [27] Cone-beam computed tomography is the imaging technique of choice for comprehensive orthodontic assessment
    Larson, Brent E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2012, 141 (04) : 402 - 406
  • [28] Cone-beam computed tomography is not the imaging technique of choice for comprehensive orthodontic assessment
    Halazonetis, Demetrios J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2012, 141 (04) : 407 - 411
  • [29] Cone-Beam Computed Tomography is the Imaging Technique of Choice for Comprehensive Orthodontic Assessment
    Larson, B. E.
    INFORMATIONEN AUS ORTHODONTIE UND KIEFERORTHOPAEDIE, 2015, 47 (04): : 221 - 224
  • [30] Cone-beam computed tomography for trauma
    Gupta, Saurabh
    Martinson, James R.
    Ricaurte, Daniel
    Scalea, Thomas M.
    Morrison, Jonathan J.
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2020, 89 (03): : E34 - E40