Participatory AI for inclusive crop improvement

被引:1
|
作者
Lasdun, Violet [1 ]
Guerena, David [2 ]
Ortiz-Crespo, Berta [2 ]
Mutuvi, Stephen [2 ]
Selvaraj, Michael [3 ]
Assefa, Teshale [2 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Econ, Houghton St, London WC2A 2AE, England
[2] Alliance Biovers & Int Ctr Trop Agr CIAT, TARI Selian, Dodoma Rd, Arusha, Tanzania
[3] Alliance Biovers & Int Ctr Trop Agr CIAT, Km 17 Via Cali,Palmira Campus, Palmira, Colombia
关键词
Image-based phenotyping; Participatory plant breeding; Computer vision; On-farm variety evaluation; AI-assisted data-collection; Human centered design; DIFFUSION; SYSTEMS; DEMAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104054
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
CONTEXT: Crop breeding in the Global South faces a 'phenotyping bottleneck' due to reliance on manual visual phenotyping, which is both error-prone and challenging to scale across multiple environments, inhibiting selection of germplasm adapted to farmer production environments. This limitation impedes rapid varietal turnover, crucial for maintaining high yields and food security under climate change. Low adoption of improved varieties results from a top-down system in which farmers have been more passive recipients than active participants in varietal development. OBJECTIVE: A new suite of research at the Alliance of Bioversity and CIAT seeks to democratize crop breeding by leveraging mobile phenotyping technologies for high-quality, decentralized data collection. This approach aims to resolve the inherent limitations and inconsistencies in traditional visual phenotyping methods, allowing for more accurate and efficient crop assessment. In parallel, the research seeks to harness multimodal data on farmer preferences to better tailor variety development to meet specific production and consumption goals. METHODS: Novel mobile phenotyping tools were developed and field-tested on breeder stations in Colombia and Tanzania, and data from these trials were analyzed for quality and accuracy, and compared with traditional manual estimates and absolute ground truth data. Concurrently, Human-Centered Design (HCD) methods were applied to ensure the technology suits its context of use, and serves the nuanced requirements of breeders. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Computer vison (CV)-enabled mobile phenotyping achieved a significant reduction in scoring variation, attaining imagery-modeled trait accuracies with Pearson Correlation values between 0.88 and 0.95 with ground truth data, and reduced labor requirements with the ability to fully phenotype a breeder's plot (4 m x 3 m) in under a minute. With this technology, high-quality quantitative phenotyping data can be collected by anyone with a smartphone, expanding the potential to measure crop performance in decentralized on-farm environments and improving accuracy and speed of crop improvement on breeder stations. SIGNIFICANCE: Inclusive innovations in mobile phenotyping technologies and AI-supported data collection enable rapid, accurate trait assessment and actively involve farmers in variety selection, aligning breeding programs with local needs and preferences. These advancements offer a timely solution for accelerating varietal turnover to mitigate climate change impacts, while ensuring developed varieties are both high-performing and culturally relevant.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] Designing Inclusive Social Networks: A Participatory Approach
    Anhol Almeida, Leonelo Dell
    de Almeida Neris, Vania Paula
    de Miranda, Leonardo Cunha
    Saito Hayashi, Elaine Cristina
    Calani Baranauskas, Maria Cecilia
    ONLINE COMMUNITIES AND SOCIAL COMPUTING, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 5621 : 653 - 662
  • [23] Inclusive research using a participatory action approach
    Cobigo, V.
    Grandia, P.
    Ouellette-Kuntz, H.
    Martin, L.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2014, 27 (04) : 329 - 329
  • [24] Participatory and Inclusive Approaches to Disability Program Evaluation
    Robinson, Sally
    Fisher, Karen R.
    Strike, Robert
    AUSTRALIAN SOCIAL WORK, 2014, 67 (04) : 495 - 508
  • [25] Farmer Participatory Crop Improvement. I. Varietal Selection and Breeding Methods and Their Impact on Biodiversity
    Witcombe, J. R.
    Joshi, A.
    Joshi, K. D.
    Sthapit, B. R.
    Experimental Agriculture, 32 (04):
  • [26] Can participatory democracy become "inclusive"? Class, mobilization and voice in participatory institutions
    Garcia-Espin, Patricia
    EUROPEAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2024,
  • [27] CROP IMPROVEMENT
    KELLER, WA
    RAJHATHY, T
    AGROLOGIST, 1981, 10 (03): : 11 - 13
  • [28] AI Literacy for All: A Participatory Approach
    Kasinidou, Maria
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2023 CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY IN COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION, ITICSE 2023, VOL. 2, 2023, : 607 - 608
  • [29] Crowdsourcing Crop Improvement in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Proposal for a Scalable and Inclusive Approach to Food Security
    van Etten, Jacob
    IDS BULLETIN-INSTITUTE OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2011, 42 (04): : 102 - 110
  • [30] Breeding 4.0 vis-à-vis application of artificial intelligence (AI) in crop improvement: an overview
    Ansari, Rounaq
    Manna, Anindita
    Hazra, Soham
    Bose, Suvojit
    Chatterjee, Avishek
    Sen, Poulomi
    NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF CROP AND HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2024,