Holistic eco-social imaginaries for a life-centered future

被引:0
|
作者
Waddock, Sandra [1 ]
机构
[1] Boston Coll, Carroll Sch Management, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467 USA
关键词
Social imaginary; Eco-social imaginary; Imaginary; Narrative; Transformation; Social ecological imaginary; SUSTAINABILITY; CONTRACT; COMPLEXITY; SOCIETY; CRISIS; PROFIT;
D O I
10.1007/s11625-024-01564-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper argues that for humanity to deal with the intersecting, existential threats of polycrisis, broad-based narrative changes are needed to make practical and relevant eco-social (or social ecological) imaginaries and related contracts. An imaginary is how people conceive or think about the world around them and their relationship to it. Social contracts are explicit and implicit agreements about how humans structure their social institutions, including rights and obligations, privileges, benefits, and restrictions. Current imaginaries (and related contracts) are almost solely human-centric, while the shift argued for here is towards eco-social imaginaries, in which both humans and nature are granted rights to flourish. Such new imaginaries have the potential to shift ideas about humans as actors in the world towards life-centric eco-social understandings in which human beings are seen as part of and interdependent with nature, and develop economies and societies oriented towards wellbeing for both humans and nature. While historically social imaginaries and their related social contracts have been human-centric, more ecologically centric imaginaries have been emerging for several decades, and in the early 2020s, as this paper documents, have now begun to become explicit. This paper identifies seven recent efforts to define and make explicit the broad parameters of such eco-social imaginaries that might be widely deployed to begin the difficult and long-term process of systemic change needed to achieve flourishing for humans and nature.
引用
收藏
页码:2119 / 2134
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Conception of eco-social knowledge revisited
    Yanitsky, O. N.
    SOTSIOLOGICHESKIE ISSLEDOVANIYA, 2014, (04): : 3 - 13
  • [22] Terminal capitalism, eco-social transition, eco-fascism
    Morales Bonilla, Cristopher
    RES PUBLICA-REVISTA DE FILOSOFIA POLITICA, 2019, 22 (02): : 587 - 591
  • [23] Eco-social design: who pays for it?
    Elzenbaumer, Bianca
    Franz, Fabio
    Krois, Kris
    Mattozzi, Alvise
    DESIGN JOURNAL, 2017, 20 : S4678 - S4682
  • [24] Uncovering different degrees of eco-social policy
    Krause, Dunja
    GLOBAL SOCIAL POLICY, 2021, 21 (02) : 332 - 334
  • [25] Eco-Social Aspects of Economic Growth in EU
    Nezinsky, Eduard
    Fifekova, Elena
    CREATING GLOBAL COMPETITIVE ECONOMIES: 2020 VISION PLANNING & IMPLEMENTATION, VOLS 1-3, 2013, : 1905 - 1915
  • [26] Good Living and Eco-social Economy: a synthesis
    Cioce Sampaio, Carlos Alberto
    Parks, Craig David
    Mantovaneli, Oklinger, Jr.
    Quinlan, Robert Joseph
    Schlemer Alcantara, Liliane Cristine
    DESENVOLVIMENTO E MEIO AMBIENTE, 2018, 47 : 121 - 128
  • [27] An eco-social approach to healthy eating in children
    Hong, Stephanie Rose
    CHILD CARE HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 49 (04) : 784 - 785
  • [28] Enabling Participation Income for an Eco-Social State
    Laruffa, Francesco
    McGann, Michael
    Murphy, Mary P.
    SOCIAL POLICY AND SOCIETY, 2022, 21 (03) : 508 - 519
  • [29] LIFE-CENTERED CAREER-EDUCATION FOR EXCEPTIONAL-CHILDREN
    BROLIN, DE
    FOCUS ON EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN, 1982, 14 (07) : 1 - 16
  • [30] What Role for Activation in Eco-Social Policy?
    Dukelow, Fiona
    SOCIAL POLICY AND SOCIETY, 2022, 21 (03) : 496 - 507