Administrative action on drug pricing: Lessons and opportunities for the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Ian T. T. [1 ,2 ]
Lalani, Hussain S. [1 ,2 ]
Kesselheim, Aaron S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Med, Div Pharmacoepidemiol & Pharmacoecon, Program Regulat Therapeut & Law PORTAL, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: In October 2022, the Biden administration issued an executive order to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) to develop new health care payment and delivery models to lower prescription drug costs and promote access to innovative therapies. In response, the agency proposed 3 novel drug payment models for testing. OBJECTIVE: To understand the impact that CMMI demonstration projects can have on the prescription drug market. METHODS: We examined each of the models listed on the CMMI website and searched the Federal Register and news articles for additional models that contained interventions related to patient out-of-pocket drug costs, Medicare drug spending, or Medicaid drug spending. We excluded models with indirect effects on drug costs (for example, bundled payments). We comprehensively reviewed all previous cases in which CMMI has attempted models addressing prescription drug costs and spending and evaluated the circumstances, impact, and lessons learned that may aid policymakers in the design and implementation of new models. RESULTS: We identified 9 CMMI models containing direct interventions related to drug costs. Among prior models addressing drug prices, nearly half (44%, 4/9) were not implemented because of their scope, voluntary nature, and procedural challenges. No implemented models met the CMMI standard for expansion, although key elements of the Senior Savings model limiting monthly insulin costs to $35 were later incorporated into the Inflation Reduction Act. CONCLUSIONS: In future CMMI implementation efforts, we suggest maximizing voluntary collaboration when selection bias concerns are minimal, using mandatory models when not, ensuring that the geographic scope is not overly ambitious, and adhering closely to statutory authority and established administrative procedure to minimize legal challenges and maximize model demonstration utility.
引用
收藏
页码:290 / 301
页数:12
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [21] Let's Make Space for Young People to Lead: Integrating Research and Action Programming in an Arts and Technology Center: Opportunities, Challenges and Lessons Learned
    Tang Yan, Catalina
    McCune, Da'Von
    Clement-Sanders, Cody
    Dixon, Solomon
    Dreitlein, Tom
    Mohamed, Mohamud
    Muharareni, Eric
    McClay, Craig J.
    Sprague Martinez, Linda S.
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PRACTICE, 2022, 30 (01) : 45 - 70
  • [22] Public Health Impact of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Decision on Pass-Through Add-On Payments for Drug-Coated Balloons: A Call to Action (vol 11, pg 496, 2018)
    Shishehbor, M. H.
    Jaff, M. R.
    Beckman, J. A.
    Misra, S.
    Schneider, P. A.
    Lookstein, R.
    Kashyap, V. S.
    Aronow, H. D.
    Jones, W. S.
    White, C. J.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2018, 11 (09) : 920 - 920