Administrative action on drug pricing: Lessons and opportunities for the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Ian T. T. [1 ,2 ]
Lalani, Hussain S. [1 ,2 ]
Kesselheim, Aaron S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Med, Div Pharmacoepidemiol & Pharmacoecon, Program Regulat Therapeut & Law PORTAL, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: In October 2022, the Biden administration issued an executive order to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) to develop new health care payment and delivery models to lower prescription drug costs and promote access to innovative therapies. In response, the agency proposed 3 novel drug payment models for testing. OBJECTIVE: To understand the impact that CMMI demonstration projects can have on the prescription drug market. METHODS: We examined each of the models listed on the CMMI website and searched the Federal Register and news articles for additional models that contained interventions related to patient out-of-pocket drug costs, Medicare drug spending, or Medicaid drug spending. We excluded models with indirect effects on drug costs (for example, bundled payments). We comprehensively reviewed all previous cases in which CMMI has attempted models addressing prescription drug costs and spending and evaluated the circumstances, impact, and lessons learned that may aid policymakers in the design and implementation of new models. RESULTS: We identified 9 CMMI models containing direct interventions related to drug costs. Among prior models addressing drug prices, nearly half (44%, 4/9) were not implemented because of their scope, voluntary nature, and procedural challenges. No implemented models met the CMMI standard for expansion, although key elements of the Senior Savings model limiting monthly insulin costs to $35 were later incorporated into the Inflation Reduction Act. CONCLUSIONS: In future CMMI implementation efforts, we suggest maximizing voluntary collaboration when selection bias concerns are minimal, using mandatory models when not, ensuring that the geographic scope is not overly ambitious, and adhering closely to statutory authority and established administrative procedure to minimize legal challenges and maximize model demonstration utility.
引用
收藏
页码:290 / 301
页数:12
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Government As Innovation Catalyst: Lessons From The Early Center For Medicare And Medicaid Innovation Models
    Perla, Rocco J.
    Pham, Hoangmai
    Gilfillan, Richard
    Berwick, Donald M.
    Baron, Richard J.
    Lee, Peter
    McCannon, C. Joseph
    Progar, Kevin
    Shrank, William H.
    HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2018, 37 (02) : 213 - 221
  • [2] Reinventing the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation
    Berwick, Donald M.
    Gilfillan, Rick
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2021, 325 (13): : 1247 - 1248
  • [3] The experience of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (USA)
    Bassano, Amy
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 31
  • [4] The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation: The Case for Reform
    Badger, Doug
    INQUIRY-THE JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION PROVISION AND FINANCING, 2022, 59
  • [5] Guiding Principles for Center for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation Model Evaluations
    Howell, Benjamin L.
    Conway, Patrick H.
    Rajkumar, Rahul
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 313 (23): : 2317 - 2318
  • [6] New Frontiers for Palliative Care: The Center for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation
    Tapper, Sharon
    Johnson, Daniel
    Voskanian, Alen
    Furman, Christian
    Grudzen, Corita
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2013, 45 (02) : 370 - 370
  • [7] The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation-Toward Value-Based Care
    McDonough, John E.
    Adashi, Eli Y.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2022, 327 (20): : 1957 - 1958
  • [8] Special Report: New Frontiers for Palliative Care: Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation
    Tapper, Sharon
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2012, 15 (08) : 844 - 845
  • [9] How The Center For Medicare And Medicaid Innovation Should Test Accountable Care Organizations
    Shortell, Stephen M.
    Casalino, Lawrence P.
    Fisher, Elliott S.
    HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2010, 29 (07) : 1293 - 1298
  • [10] Strengthening the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation's Approach to Constructing Alternative Payment Models
    Kannarkat, Joseph T. T.
    Shah, Soleil
    Parekh, Natasha
    Crosson, Francis J. J.
    MILBANK QUARTERLY, 2023, 101 (01): : 11 - 25