Optimizing computed tomography image reconstruction for focal hepatic lesions: Deep learning image reconstruction vs iterative reconstruction

被引:0
|
作者
Jaruvongvanich, Varin [1 ]
Muangsomboon, Kobkun [1 ]
Teerasamit, Wanwarang [1 ]
Suvannarerg, Voraparee [1 ]
Komoltri, Chulaluk [1 ,2 ]
Thammakittiphan, Sastrawut
Lornimitdee, Wimonrat [1 ]
Ritsamrej, Witchuda [1 ]
Chaisue, Parinya [1 ]
Pongnapang, Napapong [3 ]
Apisarnthanarak, Piyaporn [1 ]
机构
[1] Mahidol Univ, Fac Med, Dept Radiol, Siriraj Hosp, Bangkok, Thailand
[2] Mahidol Univ, Siriraj Hosp, Fac Med, Div Res & Dev, Bangkok, Thailand
[3] Mahidol Univ, Fac Med Technol, Dept Radiol Technol, Bangkok, Thailand
关键词
Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V; Computed tomography; Deep learning image reconstruction; Iterative reconstruction; TrueFidelity; FILTERED BACK-PROJECTION; ABDOMINAL CT; BODY CT; ALGORITHM; QUALITY; CANCER; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34847
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) is a novel computed tomography (CT) reconstruction technique that minimizes image noise, enhances image quality, and enables radiation dose reduction. This study aims to compare the diagnostic performance of DLIR and iterative reconstruction (IR) in the evaluation of focal hepatic lesions. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 216 focal hepatic lesions in 109 adult participants who underwent abdominal CT scanning at our institution. We used DLIR (low, medium, and high strength) and IR (0 %, 10 %, 20 %, and 30 %) techniques for image reconstruction. Four experienced abdominal radiologists independently evaluated focal hepatic lesions based on five qualitative aspects (lesion detectability, lesion border, diagnostic confidence level, image artifact, and overall image quality). Quantitatively, we measured and compared the level of image noise for each technique at the liver and aorta. Results: There were significant differences (p < 0.001) among the seven reconstruction techniques in terms of lesion borders, image artifacts, and overall image quality. Low-strength DLIR (DLIR-L) exhibited the best overall image quality. Although high-strength DLIR (DLIR-H) had the least image noise and fewest artifacts, it also had the lowest scores for lesion borders and overall image quality. Image noise showed a weak to moderate positive correlation with participants' body mass index and waist circumference. Conclusions: The optimal-strength DLIR significantly improved overall image quality for evaluating focal hepatic lesions compared to the IR technique. DLIR-L achieved the best overall image quality while maintaining acceptable levels of image noise and quality of lesion borders.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Iterative Image Reconstruction Algorithm with Parameter Estimation by Neural Network for Computed Tomography
    Kojima, Takeshi
    Yoshinaga, Tetsuya
    ALGORITHMS, 2023, 16 (01)
  • [42] Hardware Acceleration of Iterative Image Reconstruction for X-Ray Computed Tomography
    Kim, Jung Kuk
    Zhang, Zhengya
    Fessler, Jeffrey A.
    2011 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH, AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2011, : 1697 - 1700
  • [43] Radiation Dose Reduction in Computed Tomography: Implementation of an Iterative Image Reconstruction Method
    Chartrand-Lefebvre, Carl
    Prosmanne, Odile
    Belair, Manon
    Therasse, Eric
    CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 2013, 64 (04): : 386 - 386
  • [44] Improved image quality of helical computed tomography of the head in children by iterative reconstruction
    Ono, Shun
    Niwa, Tetsu
    Yanagimachi, Noriharu
    Yamashita, Tomohiro
    Okazaki, Takashi
    Nomura, Takakiyo
    Hashimoto, Jun
    Imai, Yutaka
    JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2016, 43 (01) : 31 - 36
  • [45] Optimization of the image reconstruction procedure in multi-focal photoacoustic computed tomography
    Wan, Hongying
    Wang, Depeng
    Meng, Jing
    Song, Liang
    Ying, Leslie
    Xia, Jun
    PHOTONS PLUS ULTRASOUND: IMAGING AND SENSING 2016, 2016, 9708
  • [46] Deep learning image reconstruction in pediatric abdominal and chest computed tomography: a comparison of image quality and radiation dose
    Zhang, Kun
    Shi, Xiang
    Xie, Shuang-Shuang
    Sun, Ji-Hang
    Liu, Zhuo-Heng
    Zhang, Shuai
    Song, Jia-Yang
    Shen, Wen
    QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2022, 12 (06) : 3238 - +
  • [47] Image Quality Assessment of Deep Learning Image Reconstruction in Torso Computed Tomography Using Tube Current Modulation
    Takeuchi, Kazuhiro
    Ide, Yasuhiro
    Mori, Yuichiro
    Uehara, Yusuke
    Sukeishi, Hiroshi
    Goto, Sachiko
    ACTA MEDICA OKAYAMA, 2023, 77 (01) : 45 - 55
  • [48] Deep learning for tomographic image reconstruction
    Wang, Ge
    Ye, Jong Chul
    De Man, Bruno
    NATURE MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2020, 2 (12) : 737 - 748
  • [49] Deep Learning for PET Image Reconstruction
    Reader, Andrew J.
    Corda, Guillaume
    Mehranian, Abolfazl
    da Costa-Luis, Casper
    Ellis, Sam
    Schnabel, Julia A.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RADIATION AND PLASMA MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 5 (01) : 1 - 25
  • [50] Deep Learning for Image Reconstruction and Processing
    Teuwen, Jonas
    Hauptmann, A.
    Kachelriess, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E518 - E518