Optimizing computed tomography image reconstruction for focal hepatic lesions: Deep learning image reconstruction vs iterative reconstruction

被引:0
|
作者
Jaruvongvanich, Varin [1 ]
Muangsomboon, Kobkun [1 ]
Teerasamit, Wanwarang [1 ]
Suvannarerg, Voraparee [1 ]
Komoltri, Chulaluk [1 ,2 ]
Thammakittiphan, Sastrawut
Lornimitdee, Wimonrat [1 ]
Ritsamrej, Witchuda [1 ]
Chaisue, Parinya [1 ]
Pongnapang, Napapong [3 ]
Apisarnthanarak, Piyaporn [1 ]
机构
[1] Mahidol Univ, Fac Med, Dept Radiol, Siriraj Hosp, Bangkok, Thailand
[2] Mahidol Univ, Siriraj Hosp, Fac Med, Div Res & Dev, Bangkok, Thailand
[3] Mahidol Univ, Fac Med Technol, Dept Radiol Technol, Bangkok, Thailand
关键词
Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V; Computed tomography; Deep learning image reconstruction; Iterative reconstruction; TrueFidelity; FILTERED BACK-PROJECTION; ABDOMINAL CT; BODY CT; ALGORITHM; QUALITY; CANCER; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34847
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) is a novel computed tomography (CT) reconstruction technique that minimizes image noise, enhances image quality, and enables radiation dose reduction. This study aims to compare the diagnostic performance of DLIR and iterative reconstruction (IR) in the evaluation of focal hepatic lesions. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 216 focal hepatic lesions in 109 adult participants who underwent abdominal CT scanning at our institution. We used DLIR (low, medium, and high strength) and IR (0 %, 10 %, 20 %, and 30 %) techniques for image reconstruction. Four experienced abdominal radiologists independently evaluated focal hepatic lesions based on five qualitative aspects (lesion detectability, lesion border, diagnostic confidence level, image artifact, and overall image quality). Quantitatively, we measured and compared the level of image noise for each technique at the liver and aorta. Results: There were significant differences (p < 0.001) among the seven reconstruction techniques in terms of lesion borders, image artifacts, and overall image quality. Low-strength DLIR (DLIR-L) exhibited the best overall image quality. Although high-strength DLIR (DLIR-H) had the least image noise and fewest artifacts, it also had the lowest scores for lesion borders and overall image quality. Image noise showed a weak to moderate positive correlation with participants' body mass index and waist circumference. Conclusions: The optimal-strength DLIR significantly improved overall image quality for evaluating focal hepatic lesions compared to the IR technique. DLIR-L achieved the best overall image quality while maintaining acceptable levels of image noise and quality of lesion borders.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Deep learning image reconstruction for improvement of image quality of abdominal computed tomography: comparison with hybrid iterative reconstruction
    Yasutaka Ichikawa
    Yoshinori Kanii
    Akio Yamazaki
    Naoki Nagasawa
    Motonori Nagata
    Masaki Ishida
    Kakuya Kitagawa
    Hajime Sakuma
    Japanese Journal of Radiology, 2021, 39 : 598 - 604
  • [2] Deep learning image reconstruction for improvement of image quality of abdominal computed tomography: comparison with hybrid iterative reconstruction
    Ichikawa, Yasutaka
    Kanii, Yoshinori
    Yamazaki, Akio
    Nagasawa, Naoki
    Nagata, Motonori
    Ishida, Masaki
    Kitagawa, Kakuya
    Sakuma, Hajime
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 39 (06) : 598 - 604
  • [3] Deep learning image reconstruction for pancreatic low-dose computed tomography: comparison with hybrid iterative reconstruction
    Yoshifumi Noda
    Yukako Iritani
    Nobuyuki Kawai
    Toshiharu Miyoshi
    Takuma Ishihara
    Fuminori Hyodo
    Masayuki Matsuo
    Abdominal Radiology, 2021, 46 : 4238 - 4244
  • [4] Deep learning image reconstruction for pancreatic low-dose computed tomography: comparison with hybrid iterative reconstruction
    Noda, Yoshifumi
    Iritani, Yukako
    Kawai, Nobuyuki
    Miyoshi, Toshiharu
    Ishihara, Takuma
    Hyodo, Fuminori
    Matsuo, Masayuki
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 46 (09) : 4238 - 4244
  • [5] Computed Tomography Image Reconstruction
    Seeram, Euclid
    RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 92 (02) : 155CT - 171CT
  • [6] Assessment of Image Quality of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography in Obese Patients by Comparing Deep Learning Image Reconstruction With Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Veo
    Wang, Hongwei
    Wang, Rui
    Li, Ying
    Zhou, Zhen
    Gao, Yifeng
    Bo, Kairui
    Yu, Min
    Sun, Zhonghua
    Xu, Lei
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2022, 46 (01) : 34 - 40
  • [7] Image Quality Improvement in Deep Learning Image Reconstruction of Head Computed Tomography Examination
    Pula, Michal
    Kucharczyk, Emilia
    Zdanowicz, Agata
    Guzinski, Maciej
    TOMOGRAPHY, 2023, 9 (04) : 1485 - 1493
  • [8] Computed tomography reconstruction using deep image prior and learned reconstruction methods
    Baguer, Daniel Otero
    Leuschner, Johannes
    Schmidt, Maximilian
    INVERSE PROBLEMS, 2020, 36 (09)
  • [9] Deep learning for image reconstruction in thermoacoustic tomography
    Xu, Qiwen
    Zheng, Zhu
    Jiang, Huabei
    CHINESE PHYSICS B, 2022, 31 (02)
  • [10] Deep learning for image reconstruction in thermoacoustic tomography
    徐启文
    郑铸
    蒋华北
    Chinese Physics B, 2022, (02) : 466 - 474