The Importance of Offline Options for Online Learners

被引:0
|
作者
Ferguson, Rebecca [1 ]
Perryman, Leigh-anne [1 ]
Ball, Simon J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Open Univ, Milton Keynes, England
关键词
context; offline study; online learning; multiple formats; pedagogy; universal design for learning; UDL; UNIVERSITY-STUDENTS;
D O I
10.5334/jime.898
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The popularity of MOOCs and MOOC platforms prompted some universities to develop their first online courses, while others experimented with the format of existing online offerings. Despite the body of research identifying cognitive, metacognitive, and practical benefits of printed materials, there has been a shift towards an approach that privileges online resources, reducing opportunities to access resources offline or in printed form. Online courses can be produced more quickly and cheaply than those providing both printed and digital options. They can also benefit learners in a society that values digital skills and literacies. This paper, informed by the principles of universal design for learning (CAST 2018), asks 'What are the benefits to students of offering downloadable/printable versions of online study materials and supporting offline study?'. It takes a phenomenological approach, exploring the experience of 100 postgraduate learners on an online course delivered on the FutureLearn platform. Data was extracted from a large dataset that included all the students' course discussion postings (N = 17,158). Data analysis identified the importance of the online/offline divide and showed that, as students' contexts change, the benefits and accessibility of online, offline and print versions shifts. Printed and digital materials support different ways of learning and can have an affective impact. These findings point to ways in which learning design, skills training, and technical changes might be used to increase the affordances of digital materials for learners.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] ONLINE-OFFLINE COM
    FURLONG, JD
    JOURNAL OF MICROGRAPHICS, 1981, 14 (12): : 38 - 39
  • [32] Free speech online and offline
    Anderson, R
    COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2002, 45 (06) : 120 - 120
  • [33] Offline access to online searching
    Graves, JK
    COMPUTERS IN LIBRARIES '98, PROCEEDINGS, 1998, : 76 - 78
  • [34] Offline rules, online tools
    R C Clauser
    Journal of Brand Management, 2001, 8 (4) : 270 - 287
  • [35] PSQA QA (offline and online)
    Claessens, Michael
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S84 - S86
  • [36] Political Advertising Online and Offline
    Fowler, Erika Franklin
    Franz, Michael M.
    Martin, Gregory J.
    Peskowitz, Zachary
    Ridout, Travis N.
    AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2021, 115 (01) : 130 - 149
  • [37] When online met offline
    Nitkin, Karen
    TECHNOLOGY REVIEW, 2007, 110 (01) : 16 - 16
  • [38] Online/Offline Blind Signature
    Jiang Hua
    Hu Ran-dong
    2012 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON INFORMATION AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING, 2012, 29 : 2214 - 2218
  • [39] Ideological Segregation Online and Offline
    Gentzkow, Matthew
    Shapiro, Jesse M.
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2011, 126 (04): : 1799 - 1839
  • [40] Offline events and online hate
    Lupu, Yonatan
    Sear, Richard
    Velasquez, Nicolas
    Leahy, Rhys F.
    Restrepo, Nicholas Johnson
    Goldberg, Beth
    Johnson, Neil
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (01):