The cutoff values of functional independence measure scores for predicting discharge destination in the early stroke phase

被引:0
|
作者
Toi, Kennosuke [1 ]
Ishiyama, Daisuke [1 ]
Aoyagi, Yoichiro [1 ]
Suzuki, Kentaro [2 ]
Takayama, Toshiyuki [1 ]
Yazu, Hitomi [1 ]
Yoshida, Madoka [1 ]
Kimura, Kazumi [2 ]
机构
[1] Nippon Med Coll Hosp, Dept Rehabil Med, 1-1-5 Sendagi,Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1138603, Japan
[2] Nippon Med Coll Hosp, Dept Neurol, Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
acute stroke; discharge destination; level of independence; rehabilitation; INPATIENT REHABILITATION; ISCHEMIC-STROKE; DISPOSITION;
D O I
10.1097/MRR.0000000000000636
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
This study aimed to determine cutoff values of functional independence measure (FIM) scores to predict the discharge destinations of patients with acute stroke. The sample included 318 patients with acute stroke (mean age, 72.0 years; women, 39%). The discharge destination was categorized into three groups: home, postacute rehabilitation (hospital with convalescent rehabilitation wards), and postacute care (institution without convalescent rehabilitation wards). We assessed FIM after lifting bed restriction. Multinomial logistic regression analyses were used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the FIM scores for predicting discharge destinations, with postacute rehabilitation as a reference. Cutoff values of motor and cognitive FIM scores for distinguishing home from postacute rehabilitation and postacute care from postacute rehabilitation were determined using receiver operating characteristic curves. The proportion of home, postacute rehabilitation, and postacute care were 34.6%, 41.8%, and 23.6%, respectively. After adjustments for clinical variables, the ORs (95% CIs) for motor and cognitive FIM scores for home versus postacute rehabilitation were 1.08 (1.04-1.11) and 1.05 (0.98-1.12). Furthermore, those for postacute care versus postacute rehabilitation were 1.01 (0.98-1.04) and 0.92 (0.87-0.98). The cutoff values of the motor and cognitive FIM scores for distinguishing home from postacute rehabilitation were 37.5 (sensitivity: 0.92; specificity: 0.64) and 23.5 (sensitivity: 0.78; specificity: 0.67). Furthermore, those for distinguishing postacute care from postacute rehabilitation were 15.5 (sensitivity, 0.81; specificity, 0.51) and 12.5 (sensitivity, 0.74; specificity, 0.64). The identified cutoff values may serve as early indicators for predicting discharge destinations from acute stroke care.
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 191
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Poststroke Discharge Destination: Functional Independence and Sociodemographic Factors in Urban Japan
    Koyama, Tetsuo
    Sako, Yukari
    Konta, Misa
    Domen, Kazuhisa
    JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2011, 20 (03): : 202 - 207
  • [22] Early neuropsychological examination predicts cognitive, and functional outcome in stroke patients with discharge destination home
    van Zandvoort, ME
    Nys, GMS
    de Haan, EHF
    de Kort, PLM
    Kappelle, LJ
    JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2005, 229 : 325 - 325
  • [23] Evaluation of complete functional status of patients with stroke by Functional Independence Measure scale on admission, discharge, and six months poststroke
    Rayegani, Seyed Mansoor L.
    Raeissadat, Seyed Ahmad L.
    Alikhani, Ebrahim
    Bayat, Masume
    Bahrami, Mohammad Hasan
    Karimzadeh, Afshin
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2016, 15 (04) : 202 - 208
  • [24] Outcome Measure Scores Predict Discharge Destination in Patients With Acute and Subacute Stroke: A Systematic Review and Series of Meta-analyses
    Thorpe, Emily R.
    Garrett, Katie B.
    Smith, Ashley M.
    Reneker, Jennifer C.
    Phillips, Robert S.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGIC PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2018, 42 (01): : 2 - 11
  • [25] Predicting discharge destination in acute stroke patients using machine learning
    Ahluwalia, T.
    Lenskiy, A.
    Jones, B.
    Vlieger, R.
    Suominen, H.
    Lueck, C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2022, 17 (2_SUPPL) : 18 - 18
  • [26] Reliability and validity of the spanish adaptation of the functional independence measure plus functional assessment measure in stroke
    Llorens, Roberto
    Noe, Enrique
    Dolores Navarro, Maria
    Colomer, Carolina
    Moliner, Belen
    Rodriguez, Clara
    Ugart, Patricia
    O'Valle, Myrtha
    Blazquez, Carmen
    Villarino, Pablo
    Amoros, Desire
    Cerezo, Silvia
    Ferri, Joan
    BRAIN INJURY, 2023, 37 : 67 - 67
  • [27] The functional independence measure as outcome predictor in a homogeneous stroke population
    Pfeffer, MM
    Eschenfelder, CC
    Reding, MJ
    NEUROLOGY, 1996, 46 (02) : 4121 - 4121
  • [28] Needs assessment of individuals with stroke after discharge from hospital stratified by acute Functional Independence Measure score
    Moreland, Julie Dawn
    Depaul, Vincent G.
    Dehueck, Amy L.
    Pagliuso, Stefan A.
    Yip, Darrell W. C.
    Pollock, Barbara J.
    Wilkins, Seanne
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2009, 31 (26) : 2185 - 2195
  • [29] Factors affecting the Functional Independence Measure Gain of Patients with Stroke
    Cakir, Tuncay
    Sarier, Rahime Nur
    Koldas Dogan, Sebnem
    Toraman, Naciye Fusun
    TURKIYE FIZIKSEL TIP VE REHABILITASYON DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2015, 61 (01): : 30 - 35
  • [30] INFLUENCE OF EARLY VARIABLES IN TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY ON FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE SCORES AND REHABILITATION LENGTH OF STAY AND CHARGES
    COWEN, TD
    MEYTHALER, JM
    DEVIVO, MJ
    IVIE, CS
    LEBOW, J
    NOVACK, TA
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1995, 76 (09): : 797 - 803