The cutoff values of functional independence measure scores for predicting discharge destination in the early stroke phase

被引:0
|
作者
Toi, Kennosuke [1 ]
Ishiyama, Daisuke [1 ]
Aoyagi, Yoichiro [1 ]
Suzuki, Kentaro [2 ]
Takayama, Toshiyuki [1 ]
Yazu, Hitomi [1 ]
Yoshida, Madoka [1 ]
Kimura, Kazumi [2 ]
机构
[1] Nippon Med Coll Hosp, Dept Rehabil Med, 1-1-5 Sendagi,Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1138603, Japan
[2] Nippon Med Coll Hosp, Dept Neurol, Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
acute stroke; discharge destination; level of independence; rehabilitation; INPATIENT REHABILITATION; ISCHEMIC-STROKE; DISPOSITION;
D O I
10.1097/MRR.0000000000000636
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
This study aimed to determine cutoff values of functional independence measure (FIM) scores to predict the discharge destinations of patients with acute stroke. The sample included 318 patients with acute stroke (mean age, 72.0 years; women, 39%). The discharge destination was categorized into three groups: home, postacute rehabilitation (hospital with convalescent rehabilitation wards), and postacute care (institution without convalescent rehabilitation wards). We assessed FIM after lifting bed restriction. Multinomial logistic regression analyses were used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the FIM scores for predicting discharge destinations, with postacute rehabilitation as a reference. Cutoff values of motor and cognitive FIM scores for distinguishing home from postacute rehabilitation and postacute care from postacute rehabilitation were determined using receiver operating characteristic curves. The proportion of home, postacute rehabilitation, and postacute care were 34.6%, 41.8%, and 23.6%, respectively. After adjustments for clinical variables, the ORs (95% CIs) for motor and cognitive FIM scores for home versus postacute rehabilitation were 1.08 (1.04-1.11) and 1.05 (0.98-1.12). Furthermore, those for postacute care versus postacute rehabilitation were 1.01 (0.98-1.04) and 0.92 (0.87-0.98). The cutoff values of the motor and cognitive FIM scores for distinguishing home from postacute rehabilitation were 37.5 (sensitivity: 0.92; specificity: 0.64) and 23.5 (sensitivity: 0.78; specificity: 0.67). Furthermore, those for distinguishing postacute care from postacute rehabilitation were 15.5 (sensitivity, 0.81; specificity, 0.51) and 12.5 (sensitivity, 0.74; specificity, 0.64). The identified cutoff values may serve as early indicators for predicting discharge destinations from acute stroke care.
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 191
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cut-off values of Functional Independence Measure scores for discharge destination
    Naruishi, Koji
    Kunita, Akiko
    Nagata, Toshihiko
    Takashiba, Shogo
    Adachi, Seiji
    GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 15 (05) : 670 - 671
  • [2] Predictors of discharge destination in stroke patients with low admission functional independence measure scores following inpatient rehabilitation
    Nguyen, T
    Page, A
    Aggarwal, A
    Henke, P
    JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2005, 238 : S342 - S343
  • [3] Predicting discharge destination of stroke patients using a mathematical model based on six items from the functional independence measure
    Mauthe, RW
    Haaf, DC
    Hayn, P
    Krall, JM
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1996, 77 (01): : 10 - 13
  • [4] Determining discharge destination in geriatric evaluation and management units: Is progressive goal attainment a better early indicator of discharge destination than improvement in functional independence measure scores?
    Black, Susan
    Nicholas, Caitlin
    Cotton, Susan
    Brock, Kim
    GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 18 (07) : 1058 - 1063
  • [5] Predicting discharge destination with admission outcome scores in stroke patients
    Ouellette, D. S.
    Timple, C.
    Kaplan, S. E.
    Rosenberg, S. S.
    Rosario, E. R.
    NEUROREHABILITATION, 2015, 37 (02) : 173 - 179
  • [6] Using the Functional Independence Measure score on admission as a predictor of discharge destination for stroke patients admitted to tertiary rehabilitation settings
    Nolan, J.
    Mughal, N.
    Raymond, W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2014, 9 : 32 - 33
  • [7] THE VALUE OF FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE SCORES
    BUNCH, WH
    DVONCH, VM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 1994, 73 (01) : 40 - 43
  • [8] Validity of functional independence measure scores
    Stineman, MG
    Maislin, G
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2000, 32 (03): : 143 - 144
  • [9] Gender Does Not Predict Discharge Functional Independence Measure after Stroke
    Billinger, Sandra A.
    Lentz, Angela
    Gajewski, Byron J.
    Pohl, Patricia S.
    STROKE, 2011, 42 (03) : E127 - E128
  • [10] Predicting Functional Independence Measure Scores During Rehabilitation With Wearable Inertial Sensors
    Sprint, Gina
    Cook, Diane J.
    Weeks, Douglas L.
    Borisov, Vladimir
    IEEE ACCESS, 2015, 3 : 1350 - 1366