Tumor grade and progesterone receptor status in predicting benefit of chemotherapy in high genomic risk breast cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Ke [1 ]
Chen, Gui-Ping [2 ]
Chen, Xue-Qin [1 ]
Wu, San-Gang [3 ]
机构
[1] Xiamen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Sch Med, Xiamen Key Lab Clin Efficacy & Evidence Studies Tr, Xiamen 361003, Peoples R China
[2] Fujian Med Univ, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Zhangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Xiamen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Xiamen Canc Ctr, Sch Med,Dept Radiat Oncol,Xiamen Key Lab Radiat On, Xiamen 361003, Peoples R China
关键词
Breast cancer; recurrence score; chemotherapy; PR; tumor grade; 21-GENE RECURRENCE SCORE; ONCOTYPE DX; UNITED-STATES; EXPRESSION; BIOMARKERS; ESTROGEN; IMPACT; ASSAY;
D O I
10.1080/14737140.2024.2393749
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Not all eligible breast cancer (BC) patients could afford the expensive test of 21-gene recurrence score (RS) assay. This study aimed to identify clinicopathological factors associated with high-risk RS and examine whether these factors correlate with the benefit of chemotherapy. Research design and methods Patients diagnosed with early-stage BC, node-negative, and estrogen receptor-positive disease were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Oncotype DX database. Result We included 74,605 patients. Those with higher grade (p < 0.001) and progesterone receptor-negative (PR Neg) (p < 0.001) had the highest odds of a high-risk RS. Among them, 3.2%, 10.1%, 39.1%, 18.6%, 41.6%, and 80.1% had high-risk RS tumors in PR-positive (PR Pos)/well-differentiated (G1), PR Pos/moderately differentiated (G2), PR Pos/poorly and/or undifferentiated (G3), PR Neg/G1, PR Neg/G2, and PR Neg/G3 groups, respectively. Receipt of chemotherapy was associated with improved breast cancer-specific survival (p = 0.010) and overall survival (p < 0.001) in high-risk RS cohort. However, there were no survival benefits from chemotherapy in patients with PR Neg/G3 disease and other groups after stratification by grade and PR status (all p >= 0.05). Conclusion Our study aids in refining patient selection for the RS testing, which is crucial given its economic implications. However, 21-gene RS remains pivotal for treatment decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:1021 / 1028
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The impact of tumor detection method on genomic and clinical risk and chemotherapy recommendation in early hormone receptor positive breast cancer
    Bar, Yael
    Bar, Kfir
    Itzhak, Itay
    Niselbaum, Chen Shitrit
    Dershowitz, Nachum
    Shachar, Eliya
    Weiss-Meilik, Ahuva
    Golan, Orit
    Wolf, Ido
    Menes, Tehillah
    Sonnenblick, Amir
    BREAST, 2021, 60 : 78 - 85
  • [32] Folate Intake and Risk of Breast Cancer by Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Status in a Swedish Cohort
    Larsson, Susanna C.
    Bergkvist, Leif
    Wolk, Alicja
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2008, 17 (12) : 3444 - 3449
  • [33] Dietary lignan intake and postmenopausal breast cancer risk by estrogen and progesterone receptor status
    Touillaud, Marina S.
    Thiebaut, Anne C. M.
    Fournier, Agnes
    Niravong, Maryvonne
    Boutron-Ruault, Marie-Christine
    Clavel-Chapelon, Francoise
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2007, 99 (06): : 475 - 486
  • [34] Association of smoking with breast cancer risk by estrogen and progesterone receptor status: the multiethnic cohort
    Gram, Inger T.
    Park, Song-Yi
    Kolonel, Laurence N.
    Maskarinec, Gertraud
    Wilkens, Lynne R.
    Haiman, Christopher
    Le Marchand, Loic
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 76
  • [35] CASP8 polymorphisms, estrogen and progesterone receptor status, and breast cancer risk
    Sohee Han
    Kyoung-Mu Lee
    Ji-Yeob Choi
    Sue Kyung Park
    Ji-Young Lee
    Jong Eun Lee
    Dong-Young Noh
    Sei-Hyun Ahn
    Wonshik Han
    Dong-Hyun Kim
    Yun-Chul Hong
    Eunhee Ha
    Keun-Young Yoo
    Daehee Kang
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2008, 110 : 387 - 393
  • [36] CASP8 polymorphisms, estrogen and progesterone receptor status, and breast cancer risk
    Han, Sohee
    Lee, Kyoung-Mu
    Choi, Ji-Yeob
    Park, Sue Kyung
    Lee, Ji-Young
    Lee, Jong Eun
    Noh, Dong-Young
    Ahn, Sei-Hyun
    Han, Wonshik
    Kim, Dong-Hyun
    Hong, Yun-Chul
    Ha, Eunhee
    Yoo, Keun-Young
    Kang, Daehee
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2008, 110 (02) : 387 - 393
  • [37] Body size and risk for breast cancer in relation to estrogen and progesterone receptor status in Japan
    Iwasaki, Motoki
    Otani, Tetsuya
    Inoue, Manami
    Sasazuki, Shizuka
    Tsugane, Shoichiro
    ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2007, 17 (04) : 304 - 312
  • [38] Incorporation of Treatment Response, Tumor Grade and Receptor Status Improves Staging Quality in Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    John R. Bergquist
    Brittany L. Murphy
    Curtis B. Storlie
    Elizabeth B. Habermann
    Judy C. Boughey
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2017, 24 : 3510 - 3517
  • [39] Incorporation of Treatment Response, Tumor Grade and Receptor Status Improves Staging Quality in Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    Bergquist, John R.
    Murphy, Brittany L.
    Storlie, Curtis B.
    Habermann, Elizabeth B.
    Boughey, Judy C.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 24 (12) : 3510 - 3517
  • [40] Survival Benefit of Tamoxifen in Estrogen Receptor-Negative and Progesterone Receptor-Positive Low Grade Breast Cancer Patients
    Yang, Li-Heng
    Tseng, Hsin-Shun
    Lin, Che
    Chen, Li-Sheng
    Chen, Shou-Tung
    Kuo, Shou-Jen
    Chen, Dar-Ren
    JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2012, 15 (03) : 288 - 295