Operating Room Airborne Microbial Load: Nonscrubbed Staff Apparel Matters

被引:0
|
作者
Zuskov, Andrey [1 ]
Jones, Hugh L. [1 ]
Crowley, Brian P. [1 ]
Aparicio, Humberto A. [1 ]
Quaddoura, Ahmad A. [1 ]
Mathis, Kenneth B. [1 ]
Rodriguez, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, Houston, TX USA
来源
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 2024年 / 39卷 / 09期
关键词
infection prevention; airborne microbial load; airborne particle concentration; surgical site infection; total joint arthroplasty; OR dress; PREVENTION; COUNTS; FLOW;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2024.06.031
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Infection is a leading cause of total joint arthroplasty failure. In previous studies, we found correlations between the level of contamination, concentrations of airborne particles, and the number of staff present. In this study, we focused on the apparel of nonscrubbed operating room (OR) staff to elucidate their contribution to the airborne microbial load. Methods: We compared hospital-laundered scrubs to disposable coveralls using 2 methods. (1) Participants entered an isolation chamber with a controlled environment and completed tasks for 1 hour wearing both the approved and alternative OR attire. Settle plates collected viable contaminants that were shed by the participants during testing. (2) Lab members conducted standardized maneuvers in a functional OR that simulated typical movements of the nurse, anesthesiologist, implant representative, and entering/exiting staff. An airborne particle counter and settle plates were positioned throughout the OR. After 1 hour, the staff changed apparel and repeated the test. Each session of both phases consisted of 2 tests by the same individuals on the same day. Results: There was approximately a 10-fold difference in the settlement rate of viable particles between groups when employing the isolation chamber. The settle rate for scrubs was 5,519 +/- 1,381 colony forming units (CFUs)/m(2)/h, while the settle rate for coveralls was 505 +/- 55 CFUs/m(2)/h (P = .008). During testing in the OR, 218.7 +/- 35 CFUs/m(2)/h were captured for scrubs, compared with 50.5 +/- 13 CFUs/m(2)/h for the coverall (P < .01). The concentration of airborne particles collected for scrubs was 4,952.1 +/- 495 particles/m(3) and 1,065 +/- 53 particles/m(3) for the coveralls (P < .01). This was a 77% and 79% reduction for both measures, respectively. Conclusions: The open nature of standard scrubs allows contaminated particles to escape into the OR environment, whereas the one-piece design of the coveralls restricts pathways of escape. The results of this study may be helpful when developing hospital infection prevention policies. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:S415 / S419
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Simulating the effects of operating room staff movement and door opening policies on microbial load
    Taaffe, Kevin M.
    Allen, Robert W.
    Fredendall, Lawrence D.
    Shehan, Marisa
    Stachnik, Mary Grace
    Smith, Taliyah
    Carbonell, Alfredo M.
    Glover, Emily
    Fiore, Alexis
    INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 42 (09): : 1071 - 1075
  • [2] FIELD MEASUREMENT OF AIRBORNE PARTICULATE MATTERS CONCENTRATION IN A HOSPITAL'S OPERATING ROOM
    Kamar, Haslinda Mohamed
    Kamsah, Nazri
    Yinn, Wong Keng
    Musa, Md. Nor
    Deris, Muhd Suhaimi
    JURNAL TEKNOLOGI, 2015, 77 (30):
  • [3] INTELLIGIBILITY IN THE OPERATING ROOM: SIZE MATTERS
    McNeer, R. R.
    Bennett, C. L.
    Dudaryk, R.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2016, 122
  • [4] Sizing of airborne particles in an operating room
    Tkacik, Peter T.
    Dahlberg, Jerry L.
    Johnson, James E.
    Hoth, James J.
    Szer, Rebecca A.
    Hellman, Samuel E.
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (04):
  • [5] The Influence of Traffic, Area Location, and Other Factors on Operating Room Microbial Load
    Taaffe, Kevin
    Lee, Brandon
    Ferrand, Yann
    Fredendall, Lawrence
    San, Dee
    Salgado, Cassandra
    Shvorin, Dotan
    Khoshkenar, Amin
    Reeves, Scott
    INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 39 (04): : 391 - 397
  • [6] Interdisciplinary Operating Room Ergonomics Needs and Priorities: A Survey of Operating Room Staff
    Mah, Alexis E.
    Alam, Fahad
    Cohen, Tara N.
    Hallbeck, Susan
    Tetteh, Emmanuel
    Norasi, Hamid
    Siriam, Sapna
    Hallet, Julie
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2023, 237 (05) : S419 - S419
  • [7] Thermal comfort of the surgical staff in the operating room
    Van Gaever, R.
    Jacobs, V. A.
    Diltoer, M.
    Peeters, L.
    Vanlanduit, S.
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 81 : 37 - 41
  • [8] Tracking Clinical Staff Behaviors in an Operating Room
    Azevedo-Coste, Christine
    Pissard-Gibollet, Roger
    Toupet, Gaelle
    Fleury, Eric
    Lucet, Jean-Christophe
    Birgand, Gabriel
    SENSORS, 2019, 19 (10):
  • [9] Operating Room Staff Perceptions of Medical Students
    Ji, Yisi D.
    McKinley, Sophia K.
    Farrell, Michael
    Hemingway, Maureen
    Qadan, Motaz
    Saillant, Noelle
    Phitayakorn, Roy
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2022, 79 (02) : 370 - 382
  • [10] From classroom to operating room, time management matters
    Biomed. Instrum. Technol., 2007, 3 (201-203):