Operating Room Airborne Microbial Load: Nonscrubbed Staff Apparel Matters

被引:0
|
作者
Zuskov, Andrey [1 ]
Jones, Hugh L. [1 ]
Crowley, Brian P. [1 ]
Aparicio, Humberto A. [1 ]
Quaddoura, Ahmad A. [1 ]
Mathis, Kenneth B. [1 ]
Rodriguez, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, Houston, TX USA
来源
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 2024年 / 39卷 / 09期
关键词
infection prevention; airborne microbial load; airborne particle concentration; surgical site infection; total joint arthroplasty; OR dress; PREVENTION; COUNTS; FLOW;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2024.06.031
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Infection is a leading cause of total joint arthroplasty failure. In previous studies, we found correlations between the level of contamination, concentrations of airborne particles, and the number of staff present. In this study, we focused on the apparel of nonscrubbed operating room (OR) staff to elucidate their contribution to the airborne microbial load. Methods: We compared hospital-laundered scrubs to disposable coveralls using 2 methods. (1) Participants entered an isolation chamber with a controlled environment and completed tasks for 1 hour wearing both the approved and alternative OR attire. Settle plates collected viable contaminants that were shed by the participants during testing. (2) Lab members conducted standardized maneuvers in a functional OR that simulated typical movements of the nurse, anesthesiologist, implant representative, and entering/exiting staff. An airborne particle counter and settle plates were positioned throughout the OR. After 1 hour, the staff changed apparel and repeated the test. Each session of both phases consisted of 2 tests by the same individuals on the same day. Results: There was approximately a 10-fold difference in the settlement rate of viable particles between groups when employing the isolation chamber. The settle rate for scrubs was 5,519 +/- 1,381 colony forming units (CFUs)/m(2)/h, while the settle rate for coveralls was 505 +/- 55 CFUs/m(2)/h (P = .008). During testing in the OR, 218.7 +/- 35 CFUs/m(2)/h were captured for scrubs, compared with 50.5 +/- 13 CFUs/m(2)/h for the coverall (P < .01). The concentration of airborne particles collected for scrubs was 4,952.1 +/- 495 particles/m(3) and 1,065 +/- 53 particles/m(3) for the coveralls (P < .01). This was a 77% and 79% reduction for both measures, respectively. Conclusions: The open nature of standard scrubs allows contaminated particles to escape into the OR environment, whereas the one-piece design of the coveralls restricts pathways of escape. The results of this study may be helpful when developing hospital infection prevention policies. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:S415 / S419
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The prevalence of sharp object injuries among the operating room staff
    Mehregan, Negar
    Adineh, Mohammad
    Saberipour, Bayan
    Ghorbani, Parvaneh
    Hemmatipour, Akram
    Alasvand, Milad
    Jafari, Arman
    JOURNAL OF NURSING AND MIDWIFERY SCIENCES, 2018, 5 (01) : 25 - 31
  • [32] IMPACT OF DEDICATED ROBOTIC STAFF ON OPERATING ROOM EFFICIENCY.
    Addison, P.
    Schecker, M.
    Mervosh, N.
    Martz, J.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2022, 65 (05) : 179 - 179
  • [33] THE LABOR FACTORS THAT AFFECT THE HEALTH OF THE NURSING STAFF IN THE OPERATING ROOM
    Burgos, Johimar
    Mendoza, Johananjoset
    Valles, Yarima
    Gimenez, Migdali
    SALUD ARTE Y CUIDADO, 2018, 11 (01): : 15 - 20
  • [34] Are aerosol-generating procedures safer in an airborne infection isolation room or operating room?
    Tsui, Ban C. H.
    Pan, Stephanie
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2020, 125 (06) : E485 - E487
  • [35] Microbial Colonization of Pneumatic Tourniquets in the Orthopedic Operating Room
    Mufarrih, Syed H.
    Qureshi, Nada Q.
    Rashid, Rizwan H.
    Ahmed, Bilal
    Irfan, Seema
    Zubairi, Akbar J.
    Noordin, Shahryar
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 11 (08)
  • [36] MICROBIAL CONTAMINATION OF TODAY'S OPERATING ROOM ENVIRONMENTS
    Reddy, Sundara
    Renkor, Valerie
    Loftus, Randy
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2018, 126 (04): : 487 - 488
  • [37] Factors Affecting Acoustics and Speech Intelligibility in the Operating Room: Size Matters
    McNeer, Richard R.
    Bennett, Christopher L.
    Horn, Danielle Bodzin
    Dudaryk, Roman
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2017, 124 (06): : 1978 - 1985
  • [38] EVALUATION OF AIRBORNE OPERATING-ROOM BACTERIA WITH A BIAP SLIT SAMPLER
    TJADE, OH
    GABOR, I
    JOURNAL OF HYGIENE, 1980, 84 (01) : 37 - 40
  • [39] Forced-air warming: a source of airborne contamination in the operating room?
    Albrecht, Mark
    Gauthier, Robert
    Leaper, David
    ORTHOPEDIC REVIEWS, 2009, 1 (02) : 85 - 89
  • [40] Testing the effectiveness of operating room ventilation with regard to removal of airborne bacteria
    Zoon, W. A. C.
    Loomans, M. G. L. C.
    Hensen, J. L. M.
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 46 (12) : 2570 - 2577