COMPARISON OF 2D AND 3D P-N JUNCTION DIFFERENTIAL CONDUCTANCE AND DIFFUSION CAPACITANCE

被引:1
|
作者
Dadamirzaev, Muhammadjon G. [1 ]
Kosimova, Mamura O. [1 ]
Boydedayev, S. R. [1 ]
Makhmudov, Azamat S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Namangan Engn Construct Inst, Namangan 160103, Uzbekistan
来源
关键词
p-n-junction; Diffusion capacitance; Differential conductance; Microwave field; 2D dimensional materials; PHOTOCURRENT GENERATION; ENERGY-CONVERSION; DIODES;
D O I
10.26565/2312-4334-2024-2-46
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
In the fabrication of 3D p-n junctions, doping or surface modification caused by ion injection changes the electrical properties and crystal structure of the semiconductor. In addition, as the size of the semiconductor device decreases, various quantum effects are gradually appearing in them. This shows that the scope of application of classical device theory is now limited. In recent years, two-dimensional (2D) materials with amazing atomically fine properties have attracted great interest. The electrostatic field properties of some 2D p-n junctions, such as WS2, MoS2, MoSe2, WSe2, and black phosphorus (BP), open the door to new possibilities for semiconductors. Changes in the diffusion capacitances and differential conductance's of 2D p-n junctions under the influence of an microwave field, and the diffusion capacitances and differential conductance's of 2D and 3D p-n junctions the change of conductivities under the influence of microwave field is compared.
引用
收藏
页码:372 / 379
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of muscle function in 2D and 3D walking simulations
    Xiao, Ming
    Higginson, Jill
    PROCEEDING OF THE ASME SUMMER BIOENGINEERING CONFERENCE - 2007, 2007, : 15 - 16
  • [42] COMPARISON OF 2D AND 3D MODELS OF SALINITY NUMERICAL SIMULATION
    Li Chunhui
    Pan Xishan
    Ke Jie
    Dong Xiaotian
    POLISH MARITIME RESEARCH, 2015, 22 : 26 - 29
  • [43] 2D and 3D analysis methods of facial asymmetry in comparison
    Berssenbruegge, Philipp
    Berlin, Nina Franka
    Kebeck, Guenther
    Runte, Christoph
    Jung, Susanne
    Kleinheinz, Johannes
    Dirksen, Dieter
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 42 (06) : E327 - E334
  • [44] COMPARISON OF 2D AND 3D WELDING SIMULATIONS OF A SIMPLE PLATE
    Dewees, David J.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING CONFERENCE, PVP 2012, VOL 2, 2012, : 273 - 281
  • [45] Comparison of 2D and 3D myocardial PET imaging.
    Knesaurek, K
    Machac, J
    Krynyckyi, BR
    Almeida, OD
    Parisi, JC
    Kim, CK
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2001, 42 (05) : 46P - 46P
  • [46] Comparison of a 2D and 3D Array of Diodes for IMRT QA
    Lawrence, M.
    Potter, L.
    Cullip, T.
    Xu, Z.
    Deschesne, K.
    Chang, S.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (06)
  • [47] Comparison between a 2D froth and a cut of 3D froth
    Oger, L
    Richard, P
    Troadec, JP
    Gervois, A
    POWDERS AND GRAINS 2001, 2001, : 7 - 10
  • [48] Comparison of 2D and 3D US of the normal fetal heart
    Leventhal, M
    Pretorius, DH
    Budorick, NE
    Lou, KV
    Nelson, TR
    RADIOLOGY, 1996, 201 : 175 - 175
  • [49] Comparison of the 2D and 3D netted radar ambiguity function
    Teng, Yu
    Woodbridge, Karl
    Baker, Chris
    2006 EUROPEAN RADAR CONFERENCE, 2006, : 273 - +
  • [50] COMPARISON OF 2D AND 3D FRACTAL DISTRIBUTIONS IN RESERVOIR SIMULATIONS
    BEIER, RA
    HARDY, HH
    SPE RESERVOIR ENGINEERING, 1994, 9 (03): : 195 - 200