The Contribution of 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT to Staging and Prognosis in Gastric Cancer

被引:2
|
作者
Beyhan, Ediz [1 ,2 ]
Cermik, Tevfik Fikret [2 ,3 ]
Fenercioglu, Ozge Erol [2 ]
Sahin, Rahime [2 ]
Alcin, Goksel [2 ]
Aksoy, Tamer [2 ,4 ]
Arslan, Esra [2 ]
Ergul, Nurhan [2 ]
机构
[1] Sirnak State Hosp, Clin Nucl Med, Nucan St 34, TR-73000 Sirnak, Turkiye
[2] Istanbul Training & Res Hosp, Clin Nucl Med, KasapIlyas Dist Org Abdurrahman Nafiz Gurman St, TR-34098 Istanbul, Turkiye
[3] Acibadem Maslak Hosp, Clin Nucl Med, Maslak, Turkiye
[4] Hisar Intercontinental Hosp, Clin Nucl Med, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
F-18; Ga-68; FDG; fibroblast activation protein; gastric cancers; PET/CT;
D O I
10.1097/RLU.0000000000005394
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Aim: This study aimed to compare the diagnostic capabilities of F-18-FDG PET/CT and Ga-68-FAPI-04 PET/CT imaging in staging gastric carcinoma, exploring the impact of Ga-68-FAPI-04 PET/CT on treatment planning and its prognostic significance. Methods: The research included 31 patients undergoing staging for gastric cancer, who received both F-18-FDG PET/CT and Ga-68-FAPI-04 PET/CT scans. We compared the SUVmax and SUVmean of the primary tumor and lymph nodes, the count of organ metastases, tumor-to-background ratios, and overall staging accuracy. Additionally, the study evaluated radiological progression-free survival and overall survival rates. Results: The Ga-68-FAPI-04 PET/CT demonstrated superior efficacy in identifying the primary tumor compared with F-18-FDG PET/CT, particularly in cases of poorly cohesive, signet-ring cell, and mucinous subtypes, with detection rates of 96.7% versus 77.4% (P = 0.006 and P = 0.008, respectively). Analysis of lymph nodes showed a significantly higher detection of positive nodes with Ga-68-FAPI-04 (P = 0.026), although no significant differences were observed in SUVmax and tumor-to-background ratio on a patient basis (P > 0.05). SUVmax and tumor-to-background ratios for peritoneal involvement were notably higher with Ga-68-FAPI-04 PET/CT compared with F-18-FDG PET/CT (P = 0.04 for both). No significant differences were found in the detection of organ metastases and disease stage between the 2 imaging modalities (P > 0.05). Primary tumor uptake did not significantly impact radiological progression-free survival or overall survival in either modality. Conclusions: Ga-68-FAPI-04 PET/CT imaging surpasses F-18-FDG PET/CT in detecting the primary tumor, especially in poorly cohesive and signet-ring cell gastric cancer types, and offers improved accuracy in disease staging. This indicates its potential to enhance treatment management and prognostic assessment in gastric cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页码:e485 / e491
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Contribution of 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT to Prostate Cancer Imaging
    Ergul, Nurhan
    Cermik, Tevfik Fikret
    Alcin, Goksel
    Arslan, Esra
    Fenercioglu, Ozge Erol
    Beyhan, Ediz
    Sahin, Rahime
    Baloglu, Mehmnet Can
    Koca, Sevim Baykal
    Turkay, Rustu
    Yucetas, Ugur
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2024, 49 (03) : E105 - E110
  • [32] 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT in Synovitis, Acne, Pustulosis, Hyperostosis, and Osteitis Syndrome
    Khodeir, Micheline
    Poerio, Antonio
    Colina, Matteo
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2024, 49 (11) : e636 - e637
  • [33] Prospective comparison of 68Ga-FAPI-04 and 18F-FDG PET/CT for tumor staging in nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Ding, Haoyuan
    Liang, Juan
    Qiu, Lin
    Xu, Tingting
    Cai, Liang
    Wan, Qiang
    Wang, Li
    Liu, Ya
    Chen, Yue
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [34] ASSESSMENT OF SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS RELATED MYOCARDIAL FIBROSIS BY 68GA-FAPI-04 PET/CT
    Treutlein, C.
    Schmidkonz, C.
    Tascilar, K.
    Fakhouri, S. Chenguiti
    Dees, C.
    Gyoerfi, A. H.
    Matei, A. E.
    Baeuerle, T.
    Kuwert, T.
    Uder, M.
    Schett, G.
    Distler, J. H. W.
    Bergmann, C.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2022, 81 : 726 - 726
  • [35] 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT Findings of Abdominal Leiomyosarcoma
    Guzel, Yunus
    Can, Canan
    Sogutcu, Nilgun
    Gundes, Ebubekir
    Gundogan, Cihan
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2021, 46 (12) : E594 - E597
  • [36] 68Ga-PSMA and 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT Findings With 18F-FDG PET/CT in a Patient With Recurrent Prostate Cancer
    Tatar, Gamze
    Ergul, Nurhan
    Baloglu, Mehmet Can
    Arslan, Esra
    Cermik, Tevfik Fikret
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2023, 48 (03) : E135 - E137
  • [37] 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in Metastatic Papillary Renal Cell Cancer
    Civan, Caner
    Isik, Emine Goknur
    Karadogan, Seyfullah
    Sanli, Yasemin
    Kuyumcu, Serkan
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2023, 48 (05) : E223 - E224
  • [38] 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR Versus 18F-FDG PET/CT in the Detection of Ovarian Cancer
    Sun, Gaofeng
    Zou, Ruoyao
    Yao, Liangqing
    Zuo, Changjing
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2023, 48 (06) : 525 - 527
  • [39] Xanthogranulomatous Cholecystitis Masquerading as Gallbladder Carcinoma on 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET
    Zhang, Zeyu
    Dong, Hui
    Zhang, Lu
    Cheng, Chao
    Zuo, Changjing
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2022, 47 (10) : 895 - 896
  • [40] Complex Fibroadenoma Mimicking Breast Cancer on 68Ga-FAPI-04 and 18F-FDG PET/CT
    Alcin, Goksel
    Tatar, Gamze
    Menengic Koc, Melisa Seray
    Arslan, Esra
    Erguel, Nurhan
    Cermik, Tevfik Fikret
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2023, 48 (03) : E121 - E123