Digital dividend or divide: The digital economy and urban entrepreneurial activity

被引:9
|
作者
Zhao, Xiaoyang [1 ]
Weng, Zongyuan [2 ]
机构
[1] Huaqiao Univ, Business Sch, Quanzhou 362021, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Univ, Econ & Management Sch, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
关键词
Digital economy; Entrepreneurial activity; Regional disparity; Digitalization risk; Intellectual property protection; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY; INNOVATION; RETURNS; INFRASTRUCTURE; TECHNOLOGIES; MACHINE; MODELS; CREDIT; SPACE; FIRMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.seps.2024.101857
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The integration of the digital economy into various economic and social sectors is profoundly impacting urban entrepreneurial development. This study delves into the empirical analysis of how the digital economy influences entrepreneurial activities and the resulting gaps across cities. To achieve this, panel data from Chinese cities between 2011 and 2020, coupled with statistical information about registered enterprises in China's industrial and commercial sectors, are employed. Additionally, the study examines emerging digital risks and suggests corrective measures stemming from the rapid digital economic expansion. The findings of this research reveal that the digital economy fosters increased entrepreneurial activity within cities while simultaneously widening the gap in such activity across different urban areas-a phenomenon akin to the "Matthew effect." Importantly, these conclusions withstand rigorous testing for endogeneity and robustness. In response to digitalization risks, establishing a robust intellectual property protection system emerges as an effective countermeasure. The government's role is pivotal: it should expedite urban digitization by prioritizing new infrastructure development and fostering a conducive business environment. Furthermore, it must remain vigilant to the potential exacerbation of the "Matthew effect" and regional developmental imbalances prompted by the digital economy.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Urban versus regional divide: Comparing and classifying digital divide
    Ferro, E
    Cantamessa, M
    Paolucci, E
    E-GOVERNMENT: TOWARDS ELECTRONIC DEMOCRACY, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3416 : 81 - 90
  • [32] From the Digital Divide to the Connectivity Dividend Difference: A Connectivity Capital Perspective
    Qiu Zeqi
    Zhang Shuqin
    Liu Shiding
    Xu Yingkang
    SOCIAL SCIENCES IN CHINA, 2019, 40 (01) : 63 - 81
  • [33] Digital economy and urban economic resilience: The mediating role of technological innovation and entrepreneurial vitality
    Xiao, Suping
    Zhou, Ping
    Zhou, Lin
    Wong, Sike
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (06):
  • [35] Data divide in digital trade, and its impacts on the digital economy: A literature review
    Shah, Syed Iftikhar Hussain
    Abdulaal, Alaa
    Peristeras, Vassilios
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 15TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THEORY AND PRACTICE OF ELECTRONIC GOVERNANCE, ICEGOV 2022, 2022, : 432 - 439
  • [36] Digital entrepreneurial ecosystem: evidence from Norwegian digital platform economy index
    Barham, Lara Haitham
    Hijazine, Rami George Yousef
    QUALITY-ACCESS TO SUCCESS, 2024, 25 (202): : 27 - 39
  • [37] Digital economy and risk response: How the digital economy affects urban resilience
    Xu, Qiong
    Zhong, Meirui
    Dong, Yu
    CITIES, 2024, 155
  • [38] Bridging the digital divide as capacity building for the information economy
    Menou, MJ
    Agada, J
    Courtright, C
    ASIST 2002: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 65TH ASIST ANNUAL MEETING, VOL 39, 2002, 2002, 39 : 519 - 520
  • [39] Digital switchover: The UK digital dividend
    Bensberg, Gregory
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DIGITAL TELEVISION, 2013, 4 (01) : 87 - 92
  • [40] "Digital Dividend" or "Digital Divide": What Role Does the Internet Play in the Health Inequalities among Chinese Residents?
    Zhang, Dongling
    Zhang, Guoqing
    Jiao, Yuxin
    Wang, Yanyan
    Wang, Pengnian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (22)