Clinical outcomes for minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion with allograft using a posterior approach

被引:2
|
作者
Moghim, Robert [1 ]
Bovinet, Chris [2 ]
Jin, Max Y. [3 ]
Edwards, Katie [1 ]
Abd-Elsayed, Alaa [3 ]
机构
[1] Colorado Pain Care, Denver, CO USA
[2] Spine Ctr Southeast Georgia, Brunswick, GA USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Anesthesiol, Madison, WI USA
关键词
arthrodesis; chronic pain; posterior sacroiliac joint fusion; sacroiliac joint dysfunction; LOW-BACK-PAIN; CONSERVATIVE MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS; ARTHRODESIS; IMPLANTS; MULTICENTER; SAFETY; SERIES; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1111/papr.13406
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BackgroundSacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction can occur as a result of injury, degeneration, or inflammation. This dysfunction presents symptoms of pain at various locations, including the low back, hips, buttocks, and legs. The diagnosis of SIJ dysfunction is challenging and cannot be achieved solely with imaging studies such as X-rays, MRI, or CT. The current gold standard diagnostic modality is intra-articular SIJ blocks using two differing local anesthetics. Current treatments for SIJ dysfunction may be beneficial for short-term relief but lack long-term efficacy. The purpose of our study was to examine the outcomes of patients who underwent minimally invasive, posterior SIJ fusion using allograft at a single center. MethodsThis was a retrospective study which received exemption from the WCG IRB. Data regarding preoperative and postoperative pain levels, surgical time, complications, and medication usage were obtained retrospectively from patient electronic medical records and prescription drug monitoring program reports. No mapping was completed prior to the procedure. Pain was assessed with the 11-point (0-10) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and medication usage was assessed using Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME). Patients were included if they had been diagnosed with SIJ dysfunction using two intra-articular diagnostic blocks that resulted in at least an 80% decrease in pain and had failed conservative management. Patients with sacral insufficiency fractures were excluded. ResultsVAS scores reduced from 8.26 (SD = 1.09) at baseline to 2.59 (SD = 2.57), 2.55 (SD = 2.56), 2.71 (SD = 2.88), and 2.71 (SD = 2.88) at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively. MME reduced from 78.21 mg (SD = 51.33) to 58.95 mg (SD = 48.64), 57.61 mg (SD = 47.92), 61.71 mg (SD = 45.64), and 66.29 mg (SD = 51.65) at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively. All reductions in VAS scores and MME were statistically significant. No adverse events occurred, and the average operating room time was 40.16 min (SD = 6.27). ConclusionMinimally invasive, posterior SIJ fusion using allograft is a safe and efficacious method for managing SIJ dysfunction.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: 2-Dimensional Operative Video
    Holste, Katherine G. G.
    Saleh, Sara
    Bruzek, Amy K. K.
    Strong, Michael J. J.
    Park, Paul
    OPERATIVE NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 23 (01) : E54 - E54
  • [42] Minimally invasive lateral, posterior, and posterolateral sacroiliac joint fusion for low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xu, Kai
    Li, Ya-Ling
    Xiao, Song-Hua
    Pan, Yong-Wei
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2025, 53 (02)
  • [43] Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion for the Treatment of Brucella Pyogenic Sacroiliitis: A Case Report
    Anton, Gustavo
    Tong, Doris
    Little, Tania
    Soo, Teck M.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 11 (11)
  • [44] A systematic review of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion utilizing a lateral transarticular technique
    Heiney, Jake
    Capobianco, Robyn
    Cher, Daniel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2015, 9
  • [45] Return to Duty in Military Service Members Following Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion
    Cognetti, Daniel J.
    Anderson, Kevin D.
    Handcox, Jordan E.
    Jorgensen, Anton Y.
    MILITARY MEDICINE, 2024, 189 (3-4) : e668 - e673
  • [46] Six Month Interim Outcomes from SECURE: A Single arm, Multicenter, Prospective, Clinical Study on a Novel Minimally Invasive Posterior Sacroiliac Fusion Device
    Calodney, Aaron K.
    Azeem, Nomen
    Buchanan, Patrick
    Skaribas, Ioannis
    Antony, Ajay
    Kim, Christopher
    Girardi, George
    Vu, Chau
    Bovinet, Christopher
    Vogel, Rainer S.
    Li, Sean
    Jassal, Naveep
    Josephson, Youssef
    Lubenow, Timothy R.
    Girardi, Nicholas
    Pope, Jason E.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2022, 19 (05) : 451 - 461
  • [47] Contemporary Trends in Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Utilization in the Medicare Population by Specialty
    Hersh, Andrew M.
    Jimenez, Adrian E.
    Pellot, Karolina I.
    Gong, Jung Ho
    Jiang, Kelly
    Khalifeh, Jawad M.
    Ahmed, A. Karim
    Raad, Micheal
    Veeravagu, Anand
    Ratliff, John K.
    Jain, Amit
    Lubelski, Daniel
    Bydon, Ali
    Witham, Timothy F.
    Theodore, Nicholas
    Azad, Tej D.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 93 (06) : 1244 - 1250
  • [48] mplant survivorship analysis after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using the iFuse Implant System((R))
    Cher, Daniel J.
    Reckling, W. Carlton
    Capobianco, Robyn A.
    MEDICAL DEVICES-EVIDENCE AND RESEARCH, 2015, 8 : 485 - 492
  • [49] Durable intermediate- to long-term outcomes after minimally invasive transiliac sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular titanium implants
    Sachs, Donald
    Kovalsky, Don
    Redmond, Andy
    Limoni, Robert
    Meyer, S. Craig
    Harvey, Charles
    Kondrashov, Dimitriy
    MEDICAL DEVICES-EVIDENCE AND RESEARCH, 2016, 9 : 213 - 222
  • [50] Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular titanium implants versus nonsurgical management for sacroiliac joint dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ghaddaf, Abdullah A.
    Alsharef, Jawaher F.
    Alsharef, Noor K.
    Alsaegh, Mawaddah H.
    Alshaban, Raneem M.
    Almutairi, Amal O.
    Abualola, Amal H.
    Alshehri, Mohammed S.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 67 (01) : E16 - E26