The Gender-Equality Paradox in Intraindividual Academic Strengths: A Cross-Temporal Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Balducci, Marco [1 ]
Larose, Marie-Pier [1 ]
Stoet, Gijsbert [2 ]
Geary, David C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turku, INVEST Res Flagship Ctr, Turku, Finland
[2] Univ Essex, Dept Psychol, Colchester, England
[3] Univ Missouri, Dept Psychol Sci, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
关键词
sex differences; gender equality; intraindividual strengths; PISA; STEM fields; SEX-DIFFERENCES; WOMEN; MEN; SEGREGATION; MATHEMATICS; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1177/09567976241271330
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Independent of overall achievement, girls' intraindividual academic strength is typically reading, whereas boys' strength is typically mathematics or science. Sex differences in intraindividual strengths are associated with educational and occupational sex disparities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields. Paradoxically, these sex differences are larger in more gender-equal countries, but the stability of this paradox is debated. We assessed the stability of the gender-equality paradox in intraindividual strengths, and its relation to wealth, by analyzing the academic achievement of nearly 2.5 million adolescents across 85 countries and regions in five waves (from 2006 to 2018) of the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Girls' intraindividual strength in reading and boys' strength in mathematics and science were stable across countries and waves. Boys' advantage in science as an intraindividual strength was larger in more gender-equal countries, whereas girls' advantage in reading was larger in wealthier countries. The results have implications for reducing sex disparities in STEM fields.
引用
收藏
页码:1246 / 1259
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Gender Stereotypes Have Changed: A Cross-Temporal Meta-Analysis of US Public Opinion Polls From 1946 to 2018
    Eagly, Alice H.
    Nater, Christa
    Miller, David I.
    Kaufmann, Michele
    Sczesny, Sabine
    AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2020, 75 (03) : 301 - 315
  • [32] Narcissism over time in Australia and Canada: A cross-temporal meta-analysis
    Hamamura, Takeshi
    Johnson, Chelsea A.
    Stankovic, Michelle
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2020, 155
  • [33] Is Body Dissatisfaction Changing Across Time? A Cross-Temporal Meta-Analysis
    Karazsia, Bryan T.
    Murnen, Sarah K.
    Tylka, Tracy L.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2017, 143 (03) : 293 - 320
  • [34] The Cross-Temporal Associations between Rumination Subtypes and Substance Use in Adolescence: Exploring the Moderating Role of Gender
    Willem, Lore
    Bijttebier, Patricia
    Claes, Laurence
    Vanhalst, Janne
    Raes, Filip
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY AND BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT, 2014, 36 (01) : 143 - 154
  • [35] The Cross-Temporal Associations between Rumination Subtypes and Substance Use in Adolescence: Exploring the Moderating Role of Gender
    Lore Willem
    Patricia Bijttebier
    Laurence Claes
    Janne Vanhalst
    Filip Raes
    Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 2014, 36 : 143 - 154
  • [36] Cross-Temporal Mandalas: Ecocritical Analysis of Ulysses and Life and Death Are Wearing Me Out
    Lan, Wang
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SIXTH NORTHEAST ASIA INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON LANGUAGE, LITERATURE AND TRANSLATION, 2017, : 323 - 329
  • [37] Changes in Perceived Family Functioning of Chinese Children: A Cross-Temporal Meta-Analysis
    Xie, Yuntian
    Xie, Ruotong
    JOURNAL OF CHILD AND FAMILY STUDIES, 2024, 33 (08) : 2670 - 2680
  • [38] Growing or declining penalties? A cross-temporal analysis of unemployment scars in the German labor market
    Dieckhoff, Martina
    Giesecke, Johannes
    SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2024, 121
  • [39] Changes in empathy of nurses from 2009 to 2018: A cross-temporal meta-analysis
    Yi, Xu
    Sicheng, Xiong
    Lihui, Zhu
    Jianhui, Xie
    Zhenhui, Su
    Xiang, Ding
    Yang, Hu
    NURSING ETHICS, 2021, 28 (05) : 776 - 790
  • [40] Gender Equality and Climate Justice: A Cross-National Analysis
    Laura A. McKinney
    Gregory M. Fulkerson
    Social Justice Research, 2015, 28 : 293 - 317