EMLA cream in burns: A systematic review of safety, analgesic efficacy, and effects on burn pathophysiology

被引:2
|
作者
Rangatchew, Filip [1 ]
Schoelzer, Lars [2 ]
Drzewiecki, Krzysztof T. [1 ]
Holmgaard, Rikke [1 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Dept Plast Surg & Burn Treatment, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Hlth & Med Sci Panum, Blegdamsvej 3B, DK-2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
Burns; Pain management; EMLA; Local anesthetic; Lidocaine-prilocaine cream; Safety; LIDOCAINE-PRILOCAINE CREAM; AMIDE LOCAL-ANESTHETICS; PLASMA-CONCENTRATIONS; HUMAN-SKIN; EXTRAVASATION; DEBRIDEMENT; LIGNOCAINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjps.2024.04.001
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim: Management of procedural pain in burn care is challenging. Lidocaine-prilocaine cream 5%, eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA (R)), is a widely used, effective local anesthetic cream approved for normal intact skin, genital mucosa for superficial surgical procedures, and debridement of chronic leg ulcers. This comprehensive review aimed to determine the safety, analgesic efficacy, and effects of EMLA on burn pathophysiology to provide evidence-based clinical recommendations for introducing the topical anesthetic into burn care. Methods: The PRISMA guidelines were followed for conducting a systematic PubMed search to include all relevant preclinical and clinical studies, according to pre-specified eligibility criteria. Results: Fifteen studies were included in a qualitative synthesis, among which nine were human and six were animal studies. To date, safety and pharmacokinetic data on EMLA application in burns have been limited. Nevertheless, human studies indicated that EMLA is safe and provides adequate procedural-pain relief in adults when applied to smaller burns. Caution should be exercised when using EMLA in younger children, as systemic toxicity, pertaining to prilocaine-induced methemoglobinemia, has been reported owing to overdosing (high doses applied over large burn areas). Furthermore, animal studies demonstrate the potential beneficial effects of EMLA on burn pathophysiology such as anti-inflammatory, decreased capillary permeability to plasma proteins and edema formation, and improved tissue perfusion, which are factors that may impact burn wound progression. Conclusion: Current data on EMLA use in the management of procedural pain in small burns are sparse but suggest that EMLA is safe and effective in adults. Further clinical pharmacokinetic studies are warranted, especially for application on larger burn areas. (c) 2024 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons.
引用
收藏
页码:386 / 401
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Genetic polymorphisms of OPRM1 on the efficacy and safety of anesthetic and analgesic agents: a systematic review
    Yee, Liew
    Capule, Francis R.
    Makmor-Bakry, Mohd
    PHARMACOGENOMICS, 2022, 23 (10) : 609 - 617
  • [32] Analgesic efficacy and safety of paracetamol-codeine combinations versus paracetamol alone: A systematic review
    deCraen, AJM
    DiGiulio, G
    LampeSchoenmaeckers, AJEM
    Kessels, AGH
    Kleijnen, J
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 313 (7053): : 321 - 325
  • [33] Efficacy, safety, and dose-dependence of the analgesic effects of opioid therapy for people with osteoarthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shaheed, Christina Abdel
    Awal, Wasim
    Zhang, Geoffrey
    Gilbert, Stephen E.
    Gallacher, Daniel
    McLachlan, Andrew
    Day, Richard O.
    Ferreira, Giovanni E.
    Jones, Caitlin Mp
    Ahedi, Harbeer
    Tamrakar, Mamata
    Blyth, Fiona M.
    Stanaway, Fiona
    Maher, Christopher G.
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2022, 216 (06) : 305 - 311
  • [34] The efficacy and safety of adrenergic blockade after burn injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Flores, Orlando
    Stockton, Kellie
    Roberts, Jason A.
    Muller, Michael J.
    Paratz, Jennifer D.
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2016, 80 (01): : 146 - 155
  • [35] LIDOCAINE PRILOCAINE CREAM (EMLA(R)) VERSUS INFILTRATION ANESTHESIA - A COMPARISON OF THE ANALGESIC EFFICACY FOR PUNCH BIOPSY AND ELECTROCOAGULATION OF GENITAL WARTS IN MEN
    VANDENBERG, GM
    LILLIEBORG, S
    STOLZ, E
    GENITOURINARY MEDICINE, 1992, 68 (03): : 162 - 165
  • [36] Protocol for a systematic review of quantitative burn wound microbiology in the management of burns patients
    Kwei J.
    Halstead F.D.
    Dretzke J.
    Oppenheim B.A.
    Moiemen N.S.
    Systematic Reviews, 4 (1)
  • [37] Exenatide efficacy and safety: a systematic review
    Norris, S. L.
    Lee, N.
    Thakurta, S.
    Chan, B. K. S.
    DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2009, 26 (09) : 837 - 846
  • [38] A systematic review of the efficacy and safety of fluoridation
    C Albert Yeung
    Evidence-Based Dentistry, 2008, 9 (2) : 39 - 43
  • [39] The analgesic efficacy and safety of neuraxial magnesium sulphate: a quantitative review
    Albrecht, E.
    Kirkham, K. R.
    Liu, S. S.
    Brull, R.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2013, 68 (02) : 190 - 202
  • [40] Efficacy and safety of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for burn patients: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis
    Heng, Xue
    Cai, Peng
    Yuan, Zhiqiang
    Peng, Yizhi
    Luo, Gaoxing
    Li, Haisheng
    BURNS & TRAUMA, 2023, 11