Innovative 3D printing and molding process for secondary-skin-collimator fabrication

被引:0
|
作者
Sohn, James J. [1 ]
Kim, Haram [2 ]
Stolen, Ethan [1 ]
Chidel, Gibson [3 ]
Jang, Sung [3 ]
Furutani, Keith [4 ]
Beltran, Chris [4 ]
Lu, Bo [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Radiat & Cellular Oncol, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Varian Med Syst, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Sch Design, Chicago, IL 60607 USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Dept Radiat Oncol, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
来源
BIOMEDICAL PHYSICS & ENGINEERING EXPRESS | 2024年 / 10卷 / 05期
关键词
secondary skin collimation; electron; orthovoltage; 3D scanning; 3D printing;
D O I
10.1088/2057-1976/ad6a65
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose. Secondary skin collimation (SSC) is essential for shielding normal tissues near tumors during electron and orthovoltage radiation treatments. Traditional SSC fabrication methods, such as crafting in-house lead sheets, are labor-intensive and produce SSCs with low geometric accuracy. This study introduces a workflow that integrated 3D scanning and 3D printing technologies with an in-house mold process, enabling the production of patient-specific SSCs within six hours. Methods. An anthropomorphic head phantom was scanned with a handheld 3D scanner. The resulting scan data was imported into 3D modeling software for design. The completed model was exported to a 3D printer as a printable file. Subsequently, molten Cerrobend was poured into the mold and allowed to set, completing the SSC production. Geometric accuracy was assessed using CT images, and the shielding effectiveness was evaluated through film dosimetry. Results. The 3D printed mold achieved submillimeter accuracy (0.5 mm) and exhibited high conformity to the phantom surface. It successfully endured the weight and heat of the Cerrobend during pouring and curing. Dosimetric analysis conducted with radiochromic film demonstrated good agreement between the measured and expected attenuation values of the SSC slab, within +/- 3%. Conclusions. This study presents a proof of concept for novel mold room workflows that produce patient-specific SSCs within six hours, a significant improvement over the traditional SSC fabrication process, which takes 2-3 days. The submillimeter accuracy and versatility of 3D scanning and printing technologies afford greater design freedom and enhanced delivery accuracy for cases involving irregular geometries.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Design and fabrication of antennas using 3D printing
    Bjorgaard J.
    Hoyack M.
    Huber E.
    Mirzaee M.
    Chang Y.-H.
    Noghanian S.
    Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, 2018, 84 : 119 - 134
  • [42] The Use of 3D Printing in the Fabrication of Nasal Stents
    Mills, David
    Tappa, Karthik
    Jammalamadaka, Uday
    Weisman, Jeffery
    Woerner, Jennifer
    INVENTIONS, 2018, 3 (01)
  • [43] Improved 3D Printing Plastic Scintillator Fabrication
    Jaebum Son
    Dong Geon Kim
    Sangmin Lee
    Junesic Park
    Yonghyun Kim
    Thomas Schaarschmidt
    Yong Kyun Kim
    Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 2018, 73 : 887 - 892
  • [44] Fabrication of Rib Waveguides with 3D printing and their Characterization
    Borges, Fabio Galvao
    Denadai, Bruno Benegra
    Macedo, Andreia Gerniski
    Gonzalez Perez, Juan Carlos
    Volpato, Neri
    Pohl, Alexandre de Almeida Prado
    2022 SBFOTON INTERNATIONAL OPTICS AND PHOTONICS CONFERENCE (SBFOTON IOPC), 2022,
  • [45] Optimizing process parameters of fused deposition molding for 3D printing customized control of polyetheretherketone scaffolds
    Sun, Jingfeng
    Chen, Mantao
    Zhao, Hui
    Zheng, Wenxu
    Zhou, Wuyi
    JOURNAL OF THERMOPLASTIC COMPOSITE MATERIALS, 2024, 37 (07) : 2391 - 2408
  • [46] Improved 3D Printing Plastic Scintillator Fabrication
    Son, Jaebum
    Kim, Dong Geon
    Lee, Sangmin
    Park, Junesic
    Kim, Yonghyun
    Schaarschmidt, Thomas
    Kim, Yong Kyun
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, 2018, 73 (07) : 887 - 892
  • [47] Fused Filament Fabrication: Gateway to 3D Printing
    Heiden, Paul
    MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING, 2020, 164 (04): : 24 - +
  • [48] 3D printing: an emerging technology for sensor fabrication
    Bogue, Robert
    SENSOR REVIEW, 2016, 36 (04) : 333 - 338
  • [49] MULTIMATERIAL 3D PRINTING FOR THE FABRICATION OF FUNCTIONAL STETHOSCOPES
    Popkin, Rachel
    Lobo, Fluvio
    Stubbs, Jack
    2019 DESIGN OF MEDICAL DEVICES CONFERENCE, 2019,
  • [50] An Overview of 3D Printing Technologies for Food Fabrication
    Sun, Jie
    Zhou, Weibiao
    Huang, Dejian
    Fuh, Jerry Y. H.
    Hong, Geok Soon
    FOOD AND BIOPROCESS TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 8 (08) : 1605 - 1615