Biomechanical evaluation of a central collinear entry reconstruction nail for femoral neck fracture prophylaxis

被引:0
|
作者
Shah, Sapan [1 ]
Huang, Dave T. [1 ,2 ]
Marecek, Geoffrey [1 ]
Huang, Kevin [1 ]
Metzger, Melodie F. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Orthopaed Biomech Lab, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Orthoped Surg, Orthoped Biomech Lab, 8700 Beverly Blvd,Davis Bldg Rm 6006, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
关键词
Femoral neck; Prophylactic fixation; Central collinear; Piriformis; Trochanteric; PROXIMAL FEMUR FRACTURES; POINT;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2024.111640
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction: Reconstruction nails are commonly used to treat proximal femur fractures, with cephalic screw placement for femoral neck "prophylaxis" becoming standard practice. These implants are traditionally introduced through piriformis fossa (PF) or greater trochanter (GT) entry portals. A third "central collinear" (CC) portal has been proposed that allows entry along the femoral anatomic axis and central placement of cephalic screws. The present study aimed to quantify and compare the CC portal femoral neck strength with the two traditional (PF and GT) entry portals. Materials and Methods: Eighteen cadaveric femur specimens (nine matched pairs) were divided into three groups using a balanced incomplete block design to control for variations in age and sex: (1) GT, (2) CC, and (3) PF entry points. Specimens and implants were cut to a standard length and instrumented with straight or valgus bend nails of appropriate laterality and two cephalic screws. Specimens were mounted on a custom jig replicating load distribution along the mechanical axis. A 100 N compressive preload was applied to the femoral head, followed by loading to failure at a rate of 10 mm/s until fracture, indicated by 30 % drop in axial force. Results: The three entry points did not differ in load-to-failure: GT (6378.7 +/- 1494.9 N), P (6912.4 +/- 4924.1 N) and CC (7044.2 +/- 2911.4 N) (P = 0.948) or maximum displacement, stiffness, and toughness. Most PF specimens failed at the basicervical neck, whereas most GT specimens failed at the subcapital neck; these differences were not significant. CC specimens failed evenly split between subcapital and basicervical. Conclusion: There were no significant difference in femoral neck load-to-failure after placement of a reconstruction nail through a CC entry portal when compared to both GT and PF entry. Clinically, this suggests the CC entry portal is a viable option when clinical considerations warrant its use.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Biomechanical Comparison of Trochanteric Versus Piriformis Reconstruction Nails for Femoral Neck Fracture Prophylaxis
    Shieh, Alvin K.
    Bravin, Daniel A.
    Shelton, Trevor J.
    Garcia-Nolen, Tanya C.
    Lee, Mark A.
    Eastman, Jonathan G.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2021, 35 (08) : E293 - E297
  • [2] Ipsilateral fracture of the femoral neck and shaft, treatment by reconstruction interlocking nail
    ElShafie, MH
    Morsey, HA
    Eid, YE
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2001, 121 (1-2) : 71 - 74
  • [3] Ipsilateral fracture of the femoral neck and shaft, treatment by reconstruction interlocking nail
    M. Hossam ElShafie
    H. Adel Morsey
    Y. Emad Eid
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2001, 121 : 71 - 74
  • [4] Biomechanical evaluation of the proximal femoral nail
    Schipper, IB
    Bresina, S
    Wahl, D
    Linke, B
    van Vugt, IAB
    Schneider, E
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2002, (405) : 277 - 286
  • [5] Biomechanical comparison of the femoral neck system versus InterTan nail and three cannulated screws for unstable Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture
    Wang, Zheng
    Yang, Yong
    Feng, Gangning
    Guo, Haohui
    Chen, Zhirong
    Chen, Yaogeng
    Jin, Qunhua
    BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING ONLINE, 2022, 21 (01)
  • [6] Biomechanical comparison of the femoral neck system versus InterTan nail and three cannulated screws for unstable Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture
    Zheng Wang
    Yong Yang
    Gangning Feng
    Haohui Guo
    Zhirong Chen
    Yaogeng Chen
    Qunhua Jin
    BioMedical Engineering OnLine, 21
  • [7] Medial fracture of the femoral neck with enclosed Kuntscher nail
    Feil, Christian
    Spies, Robert
    Michalski, Stefan
    Holzgruber, Martin
    Andress, Hans-Joachim
    UNFALLCHIRURG, 2017, 120 (12): : 1086 - 1089
  • [8] Subcapital Femoral Neck Fracture after Treatment of an Intertrochanteric Fracture with Proximal Femoral Intramedullary Nail
    Kim, Joo Yong
    Kong, Gyu Min
    JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, 2016, 26 (01): : 78 - 79
  • [9] Neck fracture of femoral stems with a sharp slot at the neck: biomechanical analysis
    Yoshimoto, Kensei
    Nakashima, Yasuharu
    Nakamura, Akihiro
    Mawatari, Taro
    Todo, Mitsugu
    Hara, Daisuke
    Iwamoto, Yukihide
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2015, 20 (05) : 881 - 887
  • [10] BIOMECHANICAL STUDY ON PROXIMAL FEMORAL NAIL ANTIROTATION (PFNA) FOR INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURE
    Wang, Lizhen
    Zhao, Feng
    Han, Jingyun
    Wang, Chao
    Fan, Yubo
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2012, 12 (04)