Mathematical Modelling Abilities of Artificial Intelligence Tools: The Case of ChatGPT

被引:0
|
作者
Spreitzer, Carina [1 ]
Straser, Oliver [2 ]
Zehetmeier, Stefan [1 ]
Maass, Katja [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Klagenfurt, Inst Instruct, Sch Dev, Sterneckstr 15, A-9020 Klagenfurt, Austria
[2] Univ Educ Freiburg, Int Ctr STEM Educ ICSE, Kunzenweg 21, D-79117 Freiburg, Germany
来源
EDUCATION SCIENCES | 2024年 / 14卷 / 07期
关键词
artificial intelligence; math education; STEM education; mathematical modelling; real-life contexts; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.3390/educsci14070698
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This work explores the mathematical modelling capabilities of various iterations of ChatGPT, focusing on their performance across tasks of differing complexity and openness. The study examines the abilities of GPT-3.5, GPT-4.0, and a more instructed version, GPT-MM, in multiple scenarios. It is observed that all versions demonstrate basic mathematical problem-solving skills. However, their effectiveness varies with increasing task complexity. While GPT-4.0 and GPT-MM show marginal improvements in providing detailed solutions, significant challenges persist, especially in moderate to complex modelling contexts where comprehending the nuances of tasks becomes challenging. Additionally, the study suggests that the openness of modelling tasks has a limited impact on performance, highlighting that mathematical and contextual complexities play more critical roles. The implications of these observations are discussed in terms of potential enhancements to teaching methodologies and the integration of AI tools like GPT in educational settings. This reiterates the importance of further research to fully understand the capabilities and limitations of AI tools and ensure their effective use in education.
引用
收藏
页数:40
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Artificial intelligence, text generation tools and ChatGPT - does digital watermarking offer a solution?
    Lancaster, Thomas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EDUCATIONAL INTEGRITY, 2023, 19 (01)
  • [12] Artificial intelligence and advanced mathematical tools for power quality applications: A survey
    Ibrahim, WRA
    Morcos, MM
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER DELIVERY, 2002, 17 (02) : 668 - 673
  • [13] May Artificial Intelligence Influence Future Pediatric Research?-The Case of ChatGPT
    Corsello, Antonio
    Santangelo, Andrea
    CHILDREN-BASEL, 2023, 10 (04):
  • [14] ChatGPT: A Case Study on Copyright Challenges for Generative Artificial Intelligence Systems
    Lucchi, Nicola
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RISK REGULATION, 2024, 15 (03) : 602 - 624
  • [15] Artificial intelligence, ChatGPT and primary care
    Eguia, Hans
    Garcia, Javier Francisco Sanz
    MEDICINA DE FAMILIA-SEMERGEN, 2023, 49 (07):
  • [16] Exploring the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Qualitative Data Analysis: The Case of ChatGPT
    Morgan, David L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2023, 22
  • [17] Analyzing behavioral intentions toward Generative Artificial Intelligence: the case of ChatGPT
    Nan, Dongyan
    Sun, Seungjong
    Zhang, Shunan
    Zhao, Xiangying
    Kim, Jang Hyun
    UNIVERSAL ACCESS IN THE INFORMATION SOCIETY, 2025, 24 (01) : 885 - 895
  • [18] Artificial intelligence in education: the challenges of ChatGPT
    Rodrigues, Olira Saraiva
    Rodrigues, Karoline Santos
    TEXTO LIVRE-LINGUAGEM E TECNOLOGIA, 2023, 16
  • [19] Artificial intelligence ChatGPT failed in pharma
    Haroche, Frederic
    ACTUALITES PHARMACEUTIQUES, 2024, 63 (632):
  • [20] ChatGPT-Artificial Intelligence and Physiatry
    Daungsupawong, Hinpetch
    Wiwanitkit, Viroj
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2024, 103 (04) : e49 - e49