Initial validation of the Turkish version of the defense mechanisms rating scales-self-report-30

被引:1
|
作者
Yilmaz, Meltem [1 ]
Tas, Berke [2 ]
Celik, Deniz [3 ]
Perry, J. Christopher [4 ,5 ]
Tanzilli, Annalisa [1 ]
Di Giuseppe, Mariagrazia [6 ]
Lingiardi, Vittorio [1 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Dynam & Clin Psychol & Hlth Studies, Rome, Italy
[2] TED Univ, Dept Psychol, Ankara, Turkiye
[3] Cankaya Univ, Dept Psychol, Ankara, Turkiye
[4] McGill Univ, Dept Psychiat, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] Jewish Gen Hosp, Inst Community & Family Psychiat, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[6] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dept Hist Humanities & Soc, Rome, Italy
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2024年 / 15卷
关键词
defense mechanisms; defensive functioning; DMRS-SR-30; validation; psychometric properties; PERSONALITY ORGANIZATION; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; SYMPTOM SEVERITY; STYLE; INVENTORY; PSYCHOTHERAPY; BORDERLINE; DEPRESSION; DISORDERS; HIERARCHY;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1432170
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The Defense Mechanisms Rating Scales-Self Report-30 (DMRS-SR-30) was recently developed to add a self-report alternative to the assessment of defenses, reflecting their generally accepted hierarchical organization. In this study, we aimed to examine psychometric properties and factor structure of the Turkish language version of the DMRS-SR-30. The sample consisted of 1.002 participants who filled out a survey comprising the DMRS-SR-30, the Brief Symptom Inventory, and the Inventory of Personality Organization through Qualtrics. Confirmatory Factor Analysis indicated a three-factor structure (CFI = 0.89, RMSEA = 0.05) that confirms the DMRS theoretical frame with a relatively acceptable fit. Defensive categories and total scale scores showed good to excellent reliability (alpha values ranging from 0.64 to 0.89). Correlations between defenses, symptoms, and personality functioning demonstrated good convergent and discriminant validity. The individuals with clinically significant BSI scores (T-score >= 63) differed on the DMRS-SR-30 scores from the individuals in the non-clinical range. The Turkish version of the DMRS-SR-30 is a reliable and valid instrument to self-assess the hierarchy of defense mechanisms and overall defensive functioning. Moreover, the current study supports the validity of the tripartite model of defenses in a language and culture different from the origins of the DMRS and DMRS-SR-30.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Validation of the French Version of the Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale-Self-Report in a Large Cohort of Adult Patients With ADHD
    Micoulaud-Franchi, Jean-Arthur
    Weibel, Sebastien
    Weiss, Margaret
    Gachet, Marie
    Guichard, Kelly
    Bioulac, Stephanie
    Philip, Pierre
    Jaussent, Isabelle
    Dauvilliers, Yves
    Lopez, Regis
    JOURNAL OF ATTENTION DISORDERS, 2019, 23 (10) : 1148 - 1159
  • [32] The investigation of the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Wright and Ayre Stuttering Self-Rating Profile (WASSP)
    Uysal, Halil Tayyip
    Kose, Aysen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 2021, 56 (03) : 653 - 661
  • [33] Evaluation of auditory hallucinations in patients with schizophrenia: A validation study of the Malay version of Psychotic Symptom Rating Scales (PSYRATS)
    Wahab, Suzaily
    Zakaria, Mohd Normani
    Sidek, Dinsuhaimi
    Rahman, Abdul Hamid Abdul
    Shah, Shamsul Azhar
    Wahab, Noor Alaudin Abdul
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2015, 228 (03) : 462 - 467
  • [34] Validation of a self-report version of the diabetes self-management profile
    Wysocki, Tim
    Buckloh, Lisa M.
    Antal, Holly
    Lochrie, Amanda
    Taylor, Alex
    PEDIATRIC DIABETES, 2012, 13 (05) : 432 - 437
  • [35] Initial Validation of a Self-Administered Version of the Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (FOGQsa)
    Nilsson, M. H.
    Wictorin, K.
    Bladh, S.
    Hogstedt, A.
    Eliasson, M.
    Toreld, C.
    Reimer, J.
    Hagell, P.
    MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2010, 25 : S687 - S687
  • [36] Development and Initial Validation of the Russian Version of the RAADS-14: A Self-Report Questionnaire to Assess Autistic Traits
    Skorokhodov, Ivan V.
    Radygina, Ksenia P.
    Skorokhodova, Elena Y.
    Firsova, Svetlana P.
    Portnova, Galina V.
    Varlamov, Anton A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATION IN HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY AND EDUCATION, 2023, 13 (11) : 2724 - 2735
  • [37] Are self-report scales as effective as clinician rating scales in measuring treatment response in routine clinical practice?
    Zimmerman, Mark
    Walsh, Emily
    Friedman, Michael
    Boerescu, Daniela A.
    Attiullah, Naureen
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2018, 225 : 449 - 452
  • [38] An Initial Validation Study of the Self-Rating Scale of Self-Directed Learning for Pharmacy Education
    Behar-Horenstein, Linda S.
    Beck, Diane E.
    Su, Yu
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 2018, 82 (03) : 280 - 286
  • [39] Validation of the Spanish Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression and Zung Self-Rating Depression Scales: A Comparative Validation Study
    Ruiz-Grosso, Paulo
    Loret de Mola, Christian
    Vega-Dienstmaier, Johann M.
    Arevalo, Jorge M.
    Chavez, Kristhy
    Vilela, Ana
    Lazo, Maria
    Huapaya, Julio
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (10):
  • [40] READING DIFFICULTY LEVELS OF 11 SELF-REPORT DEPRESSION RATING-SCALES
    GODFREY, HPD
    KNIGHT, RG
    BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT, 1986, 8 (02): : 187 - 190