Initial validation of the Turkish version of the defense mechanisms rating scales-self-report-30

被引:1
|
作者
Yilmaz, Meltem [1 ]
Tas, Berke [2 ]
Celik, Deniz [3 ]
Perry, J. Christopher [4 ,5 ]
Tanzilli, Annalisa [1 ]
Di Giuseppe, Mariagrazia [6 ]
Lingiardi, Vittorio [1 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Dynam & Clin Psychol & Hlth Studies, Rome, Italy
[2] TED Univ, Dept Psychol, Ankara, Turkiye
[3] Cankaya Univ, Dept Psychol, Ankara, Turkiye
[4] McGill Univ, Dept Psychiat, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] Jewish Gen Hosp, Inst Community & Family Psychiat, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[6] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dept Hist Humanities & Soc, Rome, Italy
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2024年 / 15卷
关键词
defense mechanisms; defensive functioning; DMRS-SR-30; validation; psychometric properties; PERSONALITY ORGANIZATION; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; SYMPTOM SEVERITY; STYLE; INVENTORY; PSYCHOTHERAPY; BORDERLINE; DEPRESSION; DISORDERS; HIERARCHY;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1432170
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The Defense Mechanisms Rating Scales-Self Report-30 (DMRS-SR-30) was recently developed to add a self-report alternative to the assessment of defenses, reflecting their generally accepted hierarchical organization. In this study, we aimed to examine psychometric properties and factor structure of the Turkish language version of the DMRS-SR-30. The sample consisted of 1.002 participants who filled out a survey comprising the DMRS-SR-30, the Brief Symptom Inventory, and the Inventory of Personality Organization through Qualtrics. Confirmatory Factor Analysis indicated a three-factor structure (CFI = 0.89, RMSEA = 0.05) that confirms the DMRS theoretical frame with a relatively acceptable fit. Defensive categories and total scale scores showed good to excellent reliability (alpha values ranging from 0.64 to 0.89). Correlations between defenses, symptoms, and personality functioning demonstrated good convergent and discriminant validity. The individuals with clinically significant BSI scores (T-score >= 63) differed on the DMRS-SR-30 scores from the individuals in the non-clinical range. The Turkish version of the DMRS-SR-30 is a reliable and valid instrument to self-assess the hierarchy of defense mechanisms and overall defensive functioning. Moreover, the current study supports the validity of the tripartite model of defenses in a language and culture different from the origins of the DMRS and DMRS-SR-30.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Psychometric Properties of the Defense Mechanisms Rating Scales-Self-Report-30 (DMRS-SR-30): Internal Consistency, Validity and Factor Structure
    Prout, Tracy A.
    Di Giuseppe, Mariagrazia
    Zilcha-Mano, Sigal
    Perry, J. Christopher
    Conversano, Ciro
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2022, 104 (06) : 833 - 843
  • [2] Initial validation of the Defense Mechanisms Rating Scales Q-sort: A Comparison of Trained and Untrained Raters
    Bekes, Vera
    Prout, Tracy A.
    Di Giuseppe, Mariagrazia
    Ammar, Lauren Wildes
    Kui, Thomas
    Arsena, Giulia
    Conversano, Ciro
    MEDITERRANEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 9 (02): : 1 - 19
  • [3] Preliminary Reliability and Validity of the DMRS-SR-30, a Novel Self-Report Measure Based on the Defense Mechanisms Rating Scales
    Di Giuseppe, Mariagrazia
    Perry, John Christopher
    Lucchesi, Matilde
    Michelini, Monica
    Vitiello, Sara
    Piantanida, Aurora
    Fabiani, Matilde
    Maffei, Sara
    Conversano, Ciro
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 11
  • [4] Validation of the Persian Version of the Palin Parent Rating Scales
    Bafrooei, Ebrahim Barzegar
    Darouie, Akbar
    Maroufizadeh, Saman
    Farazi, Morteza
    FOLIA PHONIATRICA ET LOGOPAEDICA, 2025, 77 (01) : 35 - 43
  • [5] Turkish Validation of the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale
    Calik, Gokhan
    Kartal, Betul Bersan
    Stoyanov, Stoyan
    Gravas, Stavros
    Othman, Lavin
    de la Rosette, Jean
    Albayrak, Selami
    Laguna, Pilar
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 48 (03): : 236 - 242
  • [6] Validation of Self-Report Depression Rating Scales in Huntigton's Disease
    De Souza, Jennifer
    Jones, Lisa A.
    Rickards, Hugh
    MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2010, 25 (01) : 91 - 96
  • [7] The Conner's Adult ADHD Rating Scales-Long Self-Report and Observer Forms: Validation of the Catalan Version
    Antonio Amador-Campos, Juan
    Nuno, Laura
    Gomez-Benito, Juana
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY AND BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT, 2016, 38 (02) : 209 - 215
  • [8] The Conner’s Adult ADHD Rating Scales-Long Self-Report and Observer Forms: Validation of the Catalan Version
    Juan Antonio Amador-Campos
    Laura Nuño
    Juana Gómez-Benito
    Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 2016, 38 : 209 - 215
  • [9] Validation of the Portuguese version of the Psychotic Symptom Rating Scales (PSYRATS)
    Telles-Correia, Diogo
    Barbosa-Rocha, Nuno
    Gama-Marques, Joao
    Moreira, Ana L.
    Alves-Moreira, Catia
    Saraiva, Sergio
    Antunes, Filipa
    Almeida, Carolina
    Machado, Sergio
    Haddock, Gillian
    ACTAS ESPANOLAS DE PSIQUIATRIA, 2017, 45 (02): : 56 - 61
  • [10] Validation of a Turkish Version of the ICD-10 Symptom Rating (ISR)
    Kizilhan, Jan Ilhan
    Roniger, Antje
    von Heymann, Friedrich
    Tritt, Karin
    EUROPES JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 9 (02): : 366 - 377