Solar Geoengineering, Learning, and Experimentation

被引:0
|
作者
Kelly, David L. [1 ]
Heutel, Garth [2 ,3 ]
Moreno-Cruz, Juan B. [4 ]
Shayegh, Soheil [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Dept Econ, Coral Gables, FL 33146 USA
[2] Georgia State Univ, Dept Econ, Atlanta, GA USA
[3] Natl Bur Econ Res, Cambridge, MA USA
[4] Univ Waterloo, Sch Environm Enterprise & Dev, Waterloo, ON, Canada
[5] Euro Mediterranean Ctr Climate Change, CMCC Fdn, Lecce, Italy
[6] RFF CMCC European Inst Econ & Environm, Milan, Italy
关键词
C61; C63; D81; D83; Q54; Q55; Q58; geoengineering; climate change; uncertainty; learning; integrated assessment; feedbacks; solar radiation management; abatement; DICE; CLIMATE SENSITIVITY; UNCERTAINTY; ECONOMICS; AEROSOLS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1086/729608
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Solar geoengineering (SGE) can offset climate change by directly reducing temperatures. Both SGE and climate change itself are surrounded by great uncertainties. Implementing SGE affects learning about these uncertainties. We model endogenous learning over two uncertainties: the sensitivity of temperatures to carbon concentrations (the climate sensitivity) and the effectiveness of SGE in lowering temperatures. We present both theoretical and simulation results from an integrated assessment model, focusing on the informational value of SGE experimentation. Surprisingly, under current calibrated conditions, SGE deployment slows learning, causing a less informed decision. For any reasonably sized experimental SGE deployment, the temperature change becomes closer to zero and thus more obscured by noisy weather shocks. Still, some SGE use is optimal despite, not because of, its informational value. The optimal amount of SGE is very sensitive to beliefs about both uncertainties.
引用
收藏
页码:1447 / 1486
页数:40
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Stopping Solar Geoengineering Through Technical Means: A Preliminary Assessment of Counter-Geoengineering
    Parker, A.
    Horton, J. B.
    Keith, D. W.
    EARTHS FUTURE, 2018, 6 (08) : 1058 - 1065
  • [42] Stratospheric solar geoengineering without ozone loss
    Keith, David W.
    Weisenstein, Debra K.
    Dykema, John A.
    Keutsch, Frank N.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2016, 113 (52) : 14910 - 14914
  • [43] Governing solar geoengineering research as it leaves the laboratory
    Parker, Andy
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2014, 372 (2031):
  • [44] Stability of Efficient International Agreements on Solar Geoengineering
    Bakalova, Irina
    Belaia, Mariia
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2023, 86 (03): : 673 - 712
  • [45] Will Geoengineering With Solar Radiation Management Ever Be Used?
    Robock, Alan
    ETHICS POLICY & ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 15 (02) : 202 - 205
  • [46] On the credibility of threats to avoid the deployment of solar geoengineering
    Finus, Michael
    Furini, Francesco
    ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY STUDIES, 2025, 27 (01) : 1 - 21
  • [47] Pandemic politics-lessons for solar geoengineering
    Buck, Holly
    Geden, Oliver
    Sugiyama, Masahiro
    Corry, Olaf
    COMMUNICATIONS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 1 (01):
  • [48] State Commissioning of Solar Radiation Management Geoengineering
    Lockley, Andrew
    ETHICS POLICY & ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 23 (02) : 180 - 202
  • [49] Solar geoengineering research should get real
    Ricke, Katharine
    NATURE, 2023, 614 (7948) : 391 - 391
  • [50] Solar geoengineering reduces atmospheric carbon burden
    Keith, David W.
    Wagner, Gernot
    Zabel, Claire L.
    NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2017, 7 (09) : 617 - 619