Youth perceptions of AI ethics: a Q methodology approach

被引:0
|
作者
Ko, Junga [1 ]
Song, Aeri [2 ]
机构
[1] Yangji Middle Sch, Ethics Teacher, Sejong, South Korea
[2] Seowon Univ, Dept Ethics Educ, Cheongju, South Korea
关键词
AI ethics; Q methodology; student perception; AI literacy; AIED;
D O I
10.1080/10508422.2024.2396582
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
AI technology advancement has sparked a global initiative to educate youth on AI ethics. Understanding students' prior knowledge is vital. This study explores the diverse perceptions of AI ethics among Korean middle school students using Q methodology. Four types emerged: Privacy Guardians, AI Coexistence Pursuers, AI Ethics Conservatives, and Domestic Distributive Justice Advocates. These classifications reflect the students' concerns, attitudes toward AI, and value preferences. Despite differences, there is consensus on the importance of human dignity and disagreement with the fair distribution of economic benefits of AI between countries. The findings suggest the need for tailored educational strategies based on students' perceptions to foster balanced ethical reflection.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Parents' perceptions and attitudes on childhood obesity: A Q-methodology study
    Akhtar-Danesh, Noori
    Dehghan, Mahshid
    Morrison, Katherine M.
    Fonseka, Sujeewa
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF NURSE PRACTITIONERS, 2011, 23 (02): : 67 - 75
  • [42] Q-METHODOLOGY TO IDENTIFY PERCEPTIONS OF DECEASED ORGAN DONATION IN THE UK
    Muaid, R. M.
    Chesney, T.
    VESTNIK TRANSPLANTOLOGII I ISKUSSTVENNYH ORGANOV, 2022, 24 (01): : 117 - 125
  • [43] Youth perspectives on technology ethics: analysis of teens' ethical reflections on AI in learning activities
    Gazulla, Eva Durall
    Hirvonen, Noora
    Sharma, Sumita
    Hartikainen, Heidi
    Jylhae, Ville
    Iivari, Netta
    Kinnula, Marianne
    Baizhanova, Aizhan
    BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2025, 44 (05) : 888 - 911
  • [44] Understanding Researchers' AI Readiness in a Higher Education Context: Q Methodology Research
    Chaaban, Youmen
    Qadhi, Saba
    Chen, Juebei
    Du, Xiangyun
    EDUCATION SCIENCES, 2024, 14 (07):
  • [45] Ethics of research methodology requires a methodology of research ethics
    Knottnerus, J. Andre
    Tugwell, Peter
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 100 : V - VI
  • [46] Who is responsible? US Public perceptions of AI governance through the lenses of trust and ethics
    David, Prabu
    Choung, Hyesun
    Seberger, John S.
    PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2024, 33 (05) : 654 - 672
  • [47] Patients' Perceptions of Integrating AI into Healthcare: Systems Thinking Approach
    Wang, Bijun
    Asan, Onur
    Mansouri, Mo
    2022 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SYSTEMS ENGINEERING (ISSE), 2022,
  • [48] The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines
    Thilo Hagendorff
    Minds and Machines, 2020, 30 : 99 - 120
  • [49] The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines
    Hagendorff, Thilo
    MINDS AND MACHINES, 2020, 30 (01) : 99 - 120
  • [50] The ethics of AI business practices: a review of 47 AI ethics guidelines
    Blair Attard-Frost
    Andrés De los Ríos
    Deneille R. Walters
    AI and Ethics, 2023, 3 (2): : 389 - 406