Incidence of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis in Patients Receiving Rectal Indomethacin vs. Compounded Rectal Diclofenac Prophylaxis

被引:1
|
作者
Janssens, Laurens P. [1 ]
Yamparala, Aishwarya [1 ]
Martin, John [1 ]
O'Meara, John [2 ]
Harmsen, William S. [3 ]
Sathi, Thanmay [1 ]
Lemke, Elizabeth [1 ]
Dayyeh, Barham K. Abu [1 ]
Bofill-Garcia, Aliana [1 ]
Petersen, Bret T. [1 ]
Storm, Andrew C. [1 ]
Topazian, Mark [1 ]
Vargas, Eric J. [1 ]
Chandrasekhara, Vinay [1 ]
Law, Ryan J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Pharm, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Dept Biomed Stat & Informat, Rochester, MN USA
关键词
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; ERCP; Post-ERCP pancreatitis; Indomethacin; Diclofenac; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; LACTATED RINGERS SOLUTION; RISK-FACTORS; PREVENTION; HYDRATION; SEVERITY; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.1007/s10620-024-08604-5
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and AimsEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) carries a 3-15% risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). Rectal indomethacin reduces the risk of PEP, but its cost has increased more than 20-fold over the past decade. Rectal diclofenac is also used to prevent PEP but is not commercially available in the United States. The aim of this study is to compare the incidence of PEP after administration of commercially available rectal indomethacin versus compounded rectal diclofenac and assess financial implications.MethodsERCP cases at our institution with administration of 100 mg rectal indomethacin or 100 mg compounded rectal diclofenac between May 2018 and January 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The incidence and severity of PEP was compared between the indomethacin (n = 728) and diclofenac (n = 304) groups. Risk factors (young age, female sex, history of pancreatitis or PEP, sphincterotomy during procedure, pancreatic indication, trainee involvement) and protective factors (prior sphincterotomy, pancreatic duct stenting) for PEP were compared between groups.Results60 patients (8.2%) in the rectal indomethacin group and 25 patients (8.2%) in the compounded rectal diclofenac group developed PEP, resulting in moderate or severe PEP in 9 (15.0%) and 2 (8.0%) patients, respectively. The compounded rectal diclofenac group had more trainee involvement (46.1% vs. 32.8%, p = 0.0001) and more prior sphincterotomy cases (15.8% vs. 10.6%, p = 0.0193) compared to the rectal indomethacin group; no statistically significant differences were observed in all other risk and protective factors. Following switch to compounded rectal diclofenac, institutional annual cost savings amounted to $441,460.62 and patient charge decreased 45-fold.ConclusionThis retrospective single-center real-world analysis showed similar efficacy of rectal indomethacin and compounded rectal diclofenac in preventing PEP but demonstrates substantial cost savings after switching to compounded rectal diclofenac.
引用
收藏
页码:3970 / 3978
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Per-rectal diclofenac decreases the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis: What about intramuscular diclofenac?
    Saritas, Ulku
    Ustundag, Yucel
    ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 47 (07) : 659 - 659
  • [32] Appropriate Timing of Rectal Indomethacin Administration and Patient Selection in Assessment of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis
    Dong, Rui
    Zheng, Shan
    Chen, Gong
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 151 (03) : 564 - 565
  • [33] A Randomized Trial of Rectal Indomethacin and Papillary Spray of Epinephrine versus Rectal Indomethacin Alone for the Prevention of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis in High-Risk Patients
    Kamal, Ayesha
    Akshintala, Venkata
    Talukdar, Rupjyoti
    Goenka, Mahesh K.
    Kochhar, Rakesh
    Sinha, Saroj
    Goud, Rajesh
    Kumar, Vijay
    Elmunzer, B. Joseph
    Khashab, Mouen
    Kalloo, Anthony N.
    Reddy, Duvvur Nageshwar
    Singh, Vikesh K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 112 : S429 - S429
  • [34] A Randomized Trial of Rectal Indomethacin and Papillary Spray of Epinephrine versus Rectal Indomethacin Alone for the Prevention of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis in High-Risk Patients
    Kamal, Ayesha
    Akshintala, Venkata
    Talukdar, Rupjyoti
    Goenka, Mahesh K.
    Kochhar, Rakesh
    Sinha, Saroj
    Goud, Rajesh
    Kumar, Vijay
    Elmunzer, B. Joseph
    Khashab, Mouen
    Kalloo, Anthony N.
    Reddy, Duvvur Nageshwar
    Singh, Vikesh K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 112 : S429 - S430
  • [35] Role of rectal nsaids in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis
    Alabd, Mohammedomer
    Abdo, Abdelmunemeltayeib
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2013, 28 : 495 - 496
  • [36] Can rectal NSAIDs prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis?
    Pier Alberto Testoni
    Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 2012, 9 : 429 - 430
  • [37] Can rectal NSAIDs prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis?
    Testoni, Pier Alberto
    NATURE REVIEWS GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2012, 9 (08) : 429 - 430
  • [38] Rectal diclofenac versus indomethacin for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis (DIPPP): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial
    Kang, Xiaoyu
    Xia, Mingxing
    Wang, Jun
    Wang, Xiangping
    Luo, Hui
    Qin, Wenhao
    Liang, Zirong
    Zhao, Gang
    Yang, Longbao
    Sun, Hao
    Tao, Jie
    Ning, Bo
    Zhong, Li
    Zhang, Rongchun
    Ma, Xuyuan
    Zhao, Jianghai
    Yue, Laifu
    Jin, Haifeng
    Kang, Chenxi
    Ren, Gui
    Liang, Shuhui
    Wang, Haiying
    Wang, Ling
    Nie, Yongzhan
    Wu, Kaichun
    Fan, Dai-Ming
    Pan, Yanglin
    GUT, 2025,
  • [39] Role of rectal diclofenac suppository for prevention and its impact on severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis in high risk patients
    Patil, Sandeep
    Pandey, Vikas
    Pandav, Nilesh
    Ingle, Meghraj
    Phadke, Aniruddha
    Sawant, Prabha
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEPATOBILIARY AND PANCREATIC DISEASES, 2015, 5 (02): : 97 - 102
  • [40] The Role of Pancreatic Duct Stenting in the Prevention of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis in the Setting of Rectal Indomethacin Usage
    Thiruvengadam, Nikhil R.
    Forde, Kimberly
    Kochman, Michael
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 111 : S5 - S5