A review of improvements on electric vehicle battery

被引:5
|
作者
Koech, Alex K. [1 ,2 ]
Mwandila, Gershom [1 ,2 ]
Mulolani, Francis [3 ]
机构
[1] Copperbelt Univ, Sch Mines & Mineral Sci, Chem Engn Dept, Kitwe, Zambia
[2] Copperbelt Univ Africa Ctr Excellence CBU ACESM, Kitwe, Zambia
[3] Copperbelt Univ, Sch Engn, Elect Engn Dept, Kitwe, Zambia
关键词
Fast-charging lithium-ion batteries; Solid electrolyte interphase; Lithium plating; Thermal management; Battery management systems; LITHIUM-ION BATTERIES; OF-THE-ART; HIGH-ENERGY; FLUORINATED ELECTROLYTES; MANAGEMENT-SYSTEM; SHORT-CIRCUIT; NICKEL-RICH; STATE; CATHODE; ANODES;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34806
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The development of efficient and high-performance electric vehicle (EV) batteries relies on improving various components, such as the anode and cathode electrodes, separators, and electrolytes. This review paper offers an elaborate overview of different materials for these components, emphasizing their respective contributions to the improvement of EV battery performance. Carbon-based materials, metal composites, and polymer nanocomposites are explored for the anode, offering high energy density and capacity. However, they are noted to be susceptible to Li plating. Unique structures, such as Titanium niobium oxide (TiNb2O7), offer high theoretical capacity, quick Li+ intercalation, and an extended lifecycle. Meanwhile, molybdenum disulfide (MoS2), with 2D and 3D structures, exhibits high reversible specific capacity, outstanding rate performance, and cyclic stability, showing promising properties as anode material. For cathodes, lithium-iron phosphate (LFP), lithium-cobalt oxide (LCO), lithium-nickel-cobalt-aluminum oxide (NCA), lithium-nickel-manganese-cobalt oxide (NMC), and cobalt-free lithium-nickel-manganese oxide (NMO) are considered, offering specific energy and capacity advantages. For instance, LFP cathode electrodes show good thermal stability, good electrochemical performance, and long lifespan, while NMC exhibits high specific energy, relatively high capacity, and cost savings. NCA has a high specific energy, decent specific power, large capacity, and a long lifecycle. NMO shows excellent rate capability, cyclic stability, and cost-effectiveness but with limited cycle performance. Separator innovations, including polyolefin materials, nanofiber separators, graphenebased composites, and ceramic-polymer composites, are analyzed for use as separators, considering mechanical strength, porosity, wettability with the electrolyte, electrolytic absorption, cycling efficiency, and ionic conductivity. The electrolyte comprises lithium salts such as lithium tetrafluoroborate (LiBF4), lithium hexafluorophosphate (LiPF6), and other salts dissolved in carbonate solvents. This improves energy density, capacity, and cycling stability and provides high ion mobility and resistance to decomposition. By examining the existing literature, this review also explores research on the solid electrolyte interface (SEI) and lithium plating, providing valuable insights into understanding and mitigating these critical issues. Despite the progress, limitations such as practical implementation challenges, potential cost implications, and the need for further research on scale-up feasibility and long-term durability are acknowledged. These efforts to enhance the electrochemical characteristics of key battery parameters-positive and negative electrodes, separators, and electrolytes-aim to improve capacity, specific energy density, and overall energy density. These continuous endeavours strive for faster charging of EV batteries and longer travel ranges, contributing to the ongoing evolution of EV energy storage systems. Thus, this review paper not only explores remarkable strides in EV battery technology but also underscores the imperative of addressing challenges and propelling future research for sustainable and high-performance electric vehicle energy storage systems.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] System stability of battery charger for battery electric vehicle
    Li, Jing
    Jiang, Jiuchun
    Dianli Zidonghua Shebei/Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2012, 32 (09): : 13 - 17
  • [32] A Vehicle Energy Management System for a Battery Electric Vehicle
    Masjosthusmann, Christopher
    Koehler, Ulrich
    Decius, Nikolaus
    Bueker, Ulrich
    2012 IEEE VEHICLE POWER AND PROPULSION CONFERENCE (VPPC), 2012, : 339 - 344
  • [33] Electric vehicle simulation with battery in the loop
    李司光
    SULEIMAN Sharkh
    张承宁
    FRANK Walsh
    胡晓松
    JournalofBeijingInstituteofTechnology, 2011, 20 (04) : 490 - 495
  • [34] New electric vehicle battery technology
    Smolenski, Don
    Tribology and Lubrication Technology, 2024, 80 (04):
  • [35] ELECTRIC VEHICLE BATTERY DEVELOPMENT.
    Fleischmann, Charles W.
    SAE Preprints, 1979, (790158 for meet):
  • [36] Bidirectional Battery Charger for Electric Vehicle
    Tan, Kang Miao
    Ramachandaramurthy, Vigna K.
    Yong, Jia Ying
    2014 IEEE INNOVATIVE SMART GRID TECHNOLOGIES - ASIA (ISGT ASIA), 2014, : 406 - 411
  • [37] Vehicle Dynamics of Battery Electric Vehicles
    Oswald, Mario
    Schrank, Georg
    ATZ worldwide, 2021, 123 (03) : 50 - 55
  • [38] Electric vehicle battery management system
    Nan, Jinrui
    Sun, Fengchun
    Wang, Jianqun
    Qinghua Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Tsinghua University, 2007, 47 (SUPPL. 2): : 1831 - 1834
  • [39] Remanufacturing Processes of Electric Vehicle Battery
    Ramoni, Monsuru
    Zhang, Hong-Chao
    2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY (ISSST), 2012,
  • [40] ELECTRIC VEHICLE BATTERY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
    SCHWARTZ, HJ
    JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1973, 120 (08) : C223 - C223