Underbody flow control for base drag reduction of a real car model

被引:0
|
作者
Keirsbulck, Laurent [2 ,3 ]
Cadota, Olivier [1 ]
Lippert, Marc [2 ,3 ]
Boussemart, David [2 ,3 ]
Basley, Jeremy [2 ,3 ]
Delprat, Sebastien [2 ,3 ]
Paganelli, Sebastien [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Sch Engn, Liverpool L69 3GH, England
[2] Univ Polytech Hauts de France, CNRS, UMR 8201, LAMIH, F-59313 Valenciennes, France
[3] CNRS, UMR 8201, F-59313 Valenciennes, France
关键词
Instability; Drag; Control; WAKE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jweia.2024.105822
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
A 1:5 scale realistic car model of the original Twingo GT but presenting a flat underbody and no exhaust line is tested in a wind tunnel at Reynolds numbers Re = 2.15x105 . 15x10 5 to 4.3x105. . 3x10 5 . A range of underbody flow characteristic velocities Ub b = [0.5 . 5 - 0.72] . 72] U infinity infinity (U infinity U infinity the free-stream velocity) is obtained by two techniques: flow obstruction and low momentum injection. Force balance, pressure measurements and Particle Image Velocimetry are used to characterize the aerodynamics of the model while changing the underbody flow velocity. A very sharp transition in the wake is found at a critical underbody velocity Ub b = 0 . 65 U infinity . It corresponds to a sudden wake reversal with a bistable behavior between 2 equilibrium states, N or P depending on the vertical base pressure gradient or the wake orientation. The drag of the N state is larger than that of the P state. The control of the wake state by reducing the underbody flow velocity leads to beneficial increase of the base suction of approximately 20% when selecting the P state compared to the N state. The low momentum injection technique reduces drag by 10% but is ineffective at yaws 5 degrees degrees and 10 degrees, degrees , while the obstruction technique consistently increases base suction but induces additional drag.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Large eddy simulation of base drag reduction with jet boat-tail passive flow control
    Yang, Yunchao
    Xu, Heyong
    Wang, Jianlei
    Zha, Gecheng
    FRONTIERS IN FLUID MECHANICS RESEARCH, 2015, 126 : 150 - 157
  • [32] Theme Issue: Drag Reduction and Flow Control Preface
    Quadrio, Maurizio
    Choi, Kwing-So
    FLOW TURBULENCE AND COMBUSTION, 2018, 100 (04) : 875 - 876
  • [33] Suboptimal control for drag reduction in turbulent pipe flow
    Xu, CX
    Choi, JI
    Sung, HJ
    FLUID DYNAMICS RESEARCH, 2002, 30 (04) : 217 - 231
  • [34] Passive flow control for drag reduction in vehicle platoons
    Jacuzzi, Eric
    Granlund, Kenneth
    JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2019, 189 : 104 - 117
  • [35] Suboptimal control of turbulent channel flow for drag reduction
    Lee, Changhoon
    Kim, John
    Choi, Haecheon
    Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1998, 358 : 245 - 258
  • [36] Active control for drag reduction in turbulent pipe flow
    Fukagata, K
    Kasagi, N
    ENGINEERING TURBULENCE MODELLING AND EXPERIMENTS 5, 2002, : 607 - 616
  • [37] Heavy Class Helicopter Fuselage Model Drag Reduction by Active Flow Control Systems
    De Gregorio, F.
    XXIV A.I.VE.LA. ANNUAL MEETING, 2017, 882
  • [38] Suboptimal control of turbulent channel flow for drag reduction
    Lee, C
    Kim, J
    Choi, H
    JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1998, 358 : 245 - 258
  • [39] Drag Force Reduction of a Bluff-Body with an Underbody Slant and Rear Flaps
    Kowata, Shinsuke
    Ha, Jongsoo
    Yoshioka, Shuya
    Kato, Takuma
    Kohama, Yasuaki
    SAE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMMERCIAL VEHICLES, 2009, 1 (01) : 230 - 236
  • [40] Aerodynamic study of a generic car model with wheels and underbody diffuser
    Huminic, Angel
    Huminic, Gabriela
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 18 (03) : 397 - 404